Re: [PD] trouble with pd-0.48-0 and multiple screens

2017-09-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Ali On Mit, 2017-09-13 at 11:03 -0400, Ali Momeni wrote: > I'm using MacOS 10.12.6 > > I'm impressed that so many pd versions and platforms have this issue. > It's a very difficult problem to deal with; Pd is essentially > unusable with multiple screens. I'm a regular multi-screen user and di

Re: [PD] using tabwrite~ for a circular buffer?

2017-09-13 Thread Johnny Mauser via Pd-list
Funny incident as i was searching for this today as well. I indeed used a delay line in combinatin with tabsend~ and a banged switch~ to be able to have an up to date table of 8192points every 40ms at a samlingrate of 44.1k. Hope this gives any clues, esle i could give an example tomorrow. Best,

Re: [PD] using tabwrite~ for a circular buffer?

2017-09-13 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
What about using delay lines Ali? Those are circular buffers... cheers 2017-09-13 19:13 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette : > Here's what I do (probably not the only way but it works): if you > want the most recent 10 seconds of input available in a contiguous > stretch in an array, make an array big e

Re: [PD] responsability / privacy

2017-09-13 Thread Peter van Haaften
run with -nogui? On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 8:25 AM, Jean-Marie Adrien wrote: > Hello > I will make an installation in a public space soon where the machine (mac) > will be somehow accessible : > for responsibility and privacy reasons, i’d like to make it impossible to > manipulate the patches > (f

Re: [PD] using tabwrite~ for a circular buffer?

2017-09-13 Thread Miller Puckette
Here's what I do (probably not the only way but it works): if you want the most recent 10 seconds of input available in a contiguous stretch in an array, make an array big enough to hold 20 seconds, and using two tabwrite~ objects, alternatively bang one or the other every 10 seconds. At any mome

[PD] using tabwrite~ for a circular buffer?

2017-09-13 Thread Ali Momeni
hello all, is there a way to use tabwrite~ for a circular buffer? in other words, is there a way to make tabwrite~ go around and start recording in the beginning of the table, once it has reached the end? i have done some searching and found this thread: https://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/8260/

Re: [PD] trouble with pd-0.48-0 and multiple screens

2017-09-13 Thread Ali Momeni
I'm using MacOS 10.12.6 I'm impressed that so many pd versions and platforms have this issue. It's a very difficult problem to deal with; Pd is essentially unusable with multiple screens. Does anyone have an intuition of how Pd manages to break the OS's window management? Anything to look into?

Re: [PD] trouble with pd-0.48-0 and multiple screens

2017-09-13 Thread Raphaël Ilias
The same happens to me, with pd-0.47-1 mac OS X Yosemite 10.10.5 i didn't even think of it as an issue, but as never-been-supported but yes very annoying 2017-09-13 14:56 GMT+02:00 Hrvoje Radnic via Pd-list : > I had the same problem on win 10. > > Hrvoje Radnic > http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-p

[PD] Font-Metrics was:( linux: "-font-size" startup flag -- does this work?)

2017-09-13 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
Hi Alexander As Roman mentioned the "pd-gui.tcl" and you surely made your patches with Pdx, can you test tweaking the .tcl? To check if your patches render correctly? here's the How-to: https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/wiki/Crossplatform-font-metrics-%26-comparisons Plans for this were

Re: [PD] trouble with pd-0.48-0 and multiple screens

2017-09-13 Thread Hrvoje Radnic via Pd-list
I had the same problem on win 10.  Hrvoje Radnic http://soundcloud.com/sumovi-protiv-valova 00385(0)915225162 From: Max To: pd-list@lists.iem.at Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 2:44 AM Subject: Re: [PD] trouble with pd-0.48-0 and multiple screens What OS? On 2017년 09월 13일 02:2

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: linux: "-font-size" startup flag -- does this work?

2017-09-13 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hey Alexander I hear you and I am in the same boat. On Die, 2017-09-12 at 21:50 -0400, Alexander Connor wrote: > Thank you for these answers.   > > Editing the Pd text file wasn't really much of a solution for me > since I'm dealing with a very large patch with many subpatches which > would all