Re: [PD] readsf re-blocked up-sampled

Here's a quick test I made.. it seems to work OK: #N canvas 575 153 544 389 10; #N canvas 167 97 714 533 sr 1; #X obj 142 58 block~ 4096 1 64; #X obj 92 251 osc~ 6400; #X obj 92 272 tabwrite~ foo; #X obj 186 243 bng 15 250 50 0 empty empty empty 17 7 0 10 -262144 -1 -1; #X obj 319 228 readsf~; #X

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

Hi, Merged and updated on the website. Thanks! Chris. On 02/03/18 21:55, Dan Wilcox wrote: Ok, I made the PR. -- http://mccormick.cx/ ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

On 03/03/18 00:50, Christof Ressi wrote: the third argument (the one that represents the "graph on parent" and "hide object names and arguments" checkboxes) has changed its counting method. this argument actually is a bitfield where the first bit is "graph on parent" and the second bit is

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

First bit set: graph on parent Second bit set: hide object 0: no GOP 1: GOP 3: GOP + hide object name 2 doesn't make sense (no GOP but hide object name) but before Pd 0.48 it was silently interpreted as 3. > Gesendet: Freitag, 02. März 2018 um 18:12 Uhr > Von: "Alexandre Torres Porres"

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

please, what do these numbers/argument mean again? quite explicitly? what are the options, what is 0, 1, 2, 3? Are there more? What used to be "2"? What is "2" now? Is there any documentation about this out there, what is this used for in dynamic patching? thanks 2018-03-02 13:50 GMT-03:00

Re: [PD] Pd's RGB color scheme for Data Structures

On 03/02/2018 05:54 PM, José de Abreu wrote:> but for 0 to 255 rgb values, the math is simple, just divide this number > by 9/255 and discard the fractional part, then multiply by the position > and sum all (it gives a number from 0 to 999) With data structures, the color range for red, green,

Re: [PD] Pd's RGB color scheme for Data Structures

It is quite simple if i am right : Put the amount of R, G and B value on a scale between 0 and 9 and join them. So your number has 3 digits : RGB (for exemple the number 831 represents 8 for red, 3 for green and 1 for blue). If you want a full red : 900, a full green : 090, a full blue : 009, a

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

> the third argument (the one that represents the "graph on parent" and > "hide object names and arguments" checkboxes) has changed its counting > method. this argument actually is a bitfield where the first bit is "graph on parent" and the second bit is "hide object name". the people who

Re: [PD] Pd's RGB color scheme for Data Structures

please ignore the last mail, :) Em 2 de março de 2018 13:12, Alexandre Torres Porres escreveu: > mas também não seria pra agora uma turma aos sábados, muito menos algo > garantido, apenas uma menina falou que, a partir de maio, ela queira, mas > até isso se concretizar (visto

Re: [PD] Pd's RGB color scheme for Data Structures

mas também não seria pra agora uma turma aos sábados, muito menos algo garantido, apenas uma menina falou que, a partir de maio, ela queira, mas até isso se concretizar (visto que essa turma no face tem lá seus 70 interessados e nem fechou... rsrs) é outra história 2018-03-02 12:48 GMT-03:00

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

Ok, I made the PR. > On Mar 2, 2018, at 2:21 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > Here's a copy of touch which works again and I added inlets & outlets. I can > probably make a PR later with fixes to the abstractions, but just sending > this along for now. > > > > >> On Mar 2,

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

Here's a copy of touch which works again and I added inlets & outlets. I can probably make a PR later with fixes to the abstractions, but just sending this along for now. touch.pd Description: Binary data On Mar 2, 2018, at 2:02 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote:Thanks for the info. I

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

Thanks for the info. I can confirm the droidparty [touch] abstraction works again with that change. Should be a simple enough change to fix things. As I recall, that change was for a good reason but too bad that subtly was perhaps lost in communication. Luckily it's an easy fix! > On Mar 2,

[PD] Need help with forum.pdpatchrepo.info

Hello. I have registered my account on the community forum (jpcima), but I find myself unable to post on it, because I cannot receive the validation email. I have tried several personal mail accounts. I find no better place than this list to ask, sorry if it is not the right place. The support

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

IOhannes m zmölnig wrote: On 03/02/2018 02:09 AM, oliver wrote: CAPITAL LETTERS for announcing the break of a private interface? you cannot be serious about this. lowercase then ;-) best oliver ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE

Re: [PD] droidparty's [touch] on 0.48-1 and "grid" like object in vanilla

On 03/02/2018 02:09 AM, oliver wrote: > but i really think this should be mentioned in capital letters in the > release notes for PD 0.48, since i'm sure many people "exploited" this > feature to build their customized GUIs CAPITAL LETTERS for announcing the break of a private interface? you