On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 00:02 +0200, Ingo Stock wrote:
> to my knowledge it is not possible to delete a single scalar.
Thanks for the confirmation. I'm also wondering whether this will
always be like this or if it would be a trivial feature to add.
> The method
> to get rid of a scalar is to clear
On 05/19/2018 11:56 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Yeah. It's not very elegant and gets expensive pretty quickly. I was
> wondering about alternative strategies, like moving non-used scalars
> out-of-the-way and later re-use them. It's cumbersome to implement, but
> probably less drastic than the clear
2018-05-19 6:56 GMT-03:00 Roman Haefeli :
> On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 00:02 +0200, Ingo Stock wrote:
> > to my knowledge it is not possible to delete a single scalar.
>
> Thanks for the confirmation. I'm also wondering whether this will
> always be like this or if it would be a trivial feature to add.
On Sat, 2018-05-19 at 17:00 +0200, Ingo Stock wrote:
> On 05/19/2018 11:56 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > Yeah. It's not very elegant and gets expensive pretty quickly. I
> > was
> > wondering about alternative strategies, like moving non-used
> > scalars
> > out-of-the-way and later re-use them. It'
Thanks for your testing!
The lag appears on my computer already with the patch i sent with the
1050 scalars. It shows when i open the patch, create any object, say a
[float] and try to move it around.
With more scalars it can become even worse. You can test it with the
attached patch. First selec
In 0.48.1 on Ubuntu, I'm getting a horrible scenario where PD refuses to open
patches or create any more abstractions for me. I get an error message saying
"too many open files". Granted I have a lot open, but this is a serious problem
as it means I can't access all of my old performances. They
