hi there,
i have a large amount of evolving wavetables (think ppg wave and the like)
2048 points per cycle
between 64 to 256 cycles in total.
those wavetables are saved to a standard wav file.
i would like to “standardize” those wavetables to all contain only 64 waves,
hence only keeping every
yep, and there's me in the bottom of the discussion :) thanks for bringing
it up. I see I haven't done much of what I promised there to include in my
object, haha
Em ter, 1 de jan de 2019 às 01:20, Ingo Stock escreveu:
> I believe it was based on my xy abstraction, which is completely vanilla ;)
That sounds like a good lead. I've tried to strip it down to the issue,
but in the minimal example the issue isn't showing.
On 01.01.19 13:53, José de Abreu wrote:
Maybe the clear message you put inside each abstraction clears the
subpatch after pd throws the error message...
Em Ter, 1 de
Maybe the clear message you put inside each abstraction clears the subpatch
after pd throws the error message...
Em Ter, 1 de jan de 2019 09:55, Max escreveu:
> I have a patch with the singleton abstraction inside an abstraction
> called with clone 14 times. There is a [text declare -k g_major]
I have a patch with the singleton abstraction inside an abstraction
called with clone 14 times. There is a [text declare -k g_major] created
once. Yet I get 14 Warnings in the Pd console like this:
warning: g_major: multiply defined
when looking into the other instances of the cloned abstraction
