Re: [PD] Error launching PD 0.49 on Win64

Could it be related? Most likely. My Miller's distribution of 0-49 runs with an "**\pd-0.49-0\lib\reg1.2\tclreg12.dll". I think (suspect) you changed files and you are using wish86.exe and tclsh86.exe. If you don't have personal files or externals saved to "C:/Program Files/Pd" or subfolders

[PD] Error launching PD 0.49 on Win64

Hi all, i'm cleaning my computer and i unistalled some old stuff. Now when i start pd i get couldn't load library "C:/Program Files/Pd/lib/reg1.3/tclreg13.dll": invalid argument couldn't load library "C:/Program Files/Pd/lib/reg1.3/tclreg13.dll": invalid argument while executing "load

Re: [PD] sigmund~

* Matt Davey [2019-01-21 15:15]: > FINALLY got the [sigmund~] analysis joke (facepalm) > > honestly, have been wondering for a long time what that was all about... Congrats! Would you give a hint about that joke? ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing

Re: [PD] sigmund~

* Peter P. [2019-01-21 15:39]: > * Matt Davey [2019-01-21 15:15]: > > FINALLY got the [sigmund~] analysis joke (facepalm) > > > > honestly, have been wondering for a long time what that was all about... > Congrats! Would you give a hint about that joke? Oh, you mean the name of the object? You

[PD] sigmund~

FINALLY got the [sigmund~] analysis joke (facepalm) honestly, have been wondering for a long time what that was all about... ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] [text] issue reading SysEx files

On 21.01.19 12:48, Roman Haefeli wrote: > On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 10:03 +0100, Antoine Rousseau wrote: >>> make an addition to soundfiler to read binary characters into an >>> array. >> >> wouldn't "read -raw 0 1 1 n" work? > > It would be cool if -raw would allow 1 byte per sample. But even if it

Re: [PD] [text] issue reading SysEx files

On Mon, 2019-01-21 at 10:03 +0100, Antoine Rousseau wrote: > > make an addition to soundfiler to read binary characters into an > > array. > > wouldn't "read -raw 0 1 1 n" work? It would be cool if -raw would allow 1 byte per sample. But even if it worked this way, the result would be scaled to

Re: [PD] [text] issue reading SysEx files

On 21.01.19 10:03, Antoine Rousseau wrote: >> >> make an addition to soundfiler to read binary characters into an array. > > > wouldn't "read -raw 0 1 1 n" work? it would, if "-raw" accepted "1" as the number of bytes per samples (it currently only accepts 2, 3 & 4) mfgasdr IOhannes

Re: [PD] [text] issue reading SysEx files

Hi Miller, Thanks for the clarification. Having soundfiler able to read binary files would be great. In fact at the end of the day, I was trying to replace the external [binfile] that does exactly that. Cheers, Mario Sent from my WIKO U PULSE LITEOn 20 Jan 2019 23:34, Miller Puckette wrote:

Re: [PD] [text] issue reading SysEx files

> > make an addition to soundfiler to read binary characters into an array. wouldn't "read -raw 0 1 1 n" work? Le lun. 21 janv. 2019 à 00:55, Christof Ressi a écrit : > > Somewhere on my long do-list is an idea to make an addition to soundfiler > > to read binary chanracters into an array.