Note: That guide is 6 years old and for Pd-extended. It may not be up to date.
Which Pd are you compiling? If it's vanilla, you should really only need the
ALSA & JACK development libraries on Linux, aside form the usual compiler,
make, & auto tools.
> On Feb 15, 2019, at 6:42 PM, pd-list-requ.
Also, you don't need to set any of the configure flags explicitly any more.
Assuming you have the correct development headers installed, running the
following will give you a default build like Miller's:
./configure
In fact, running just ./configure will also print out the detected audio
backe
Hi list,
IOhannes, I forgot to specified that I already installed the headers and
everything specified on https://puredata.info/docs/developer/Fedora. Apart
from the video packages.
Well, about the "--without-local-portaudio" flag, this was one of my last
test. I wanted to know if adding the flag
thanks !
network socket might provide a lead…
i did not yet grasp the difference between vanilla (netsend…) and mr. peach
objects for network communication.
is there a recommendation for one over the other?
(i am running on RaspberryPi)
> On 15 Feb 2019, at 13:47, Roman Haefeli wrote:
>
> On F
On Fri, 2019-02-15 at 13:28 +0100, michael strohmann wrote:
> i know its kind of a stupid question, but
> what causes a program (or pd in particular) to become unresponsive ?
Typically, a program hangs when it is waiting for some kind of
resource. This might be a system resource (allocating memory
i know its kind of a stupid question, but
what causes a program (or pd in particular) to become unresponsive ?
i just encountered that pd was stuck on looping a snipet of an audiofile…and i
have no idea how to reproduce this...
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.
hi, i just discovered, that zexy's [matchbox] outputs the following
error in the PD console when it receives an already existing list in its
right inlet:
zverbose(1): [matchbox]: refusing to add already existing list to
buffer...
this is with PD 0.49.0, OS X Yosemite 10.10.5
it's not occur
On 2/15/19 7:16 AM, William Binta wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm new to Linux and particullary to the Fedora distribution. But as some
> people, I failed at installing the last build (0.49) on Fedora 29.
> I precisely followed the steps on the INSTALL.txt, installed every thing
> necessary mentioned fo
