* Philipp Schmalfuß [2019-11-26 14:57]:
> +1
>
> Quoting Christof Ressi :
>
> > > anyhow: i think the way forward is to make the shortcuts
> > > user-configurable, so everybody can map whatever they prefer to any
> > > menu-option.
> >
> > +1
-1
as it would mean another step for users to keep t
* IOhannes m zmölnig [2019-11-26 18:33]:
[...]
> # anatomy of a message
>
> i think it is pretty easy:
> - any message in pd-land consists of a single selector and any number of
> atoms (including none).
> - an atom can be a number, a symbol, a gpointer and "other things"
> - a selector must alwa
On 11/26/19 4:59 PM, Peter P. wrote:
> * IOhannes m zmölnig [2019-11-26 16:03]:
>> Am 26. November 2019 15:49:07 MEZ schrieb Roman Haefeli :
>>> On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 15:12 +0100, Csaba Láng wrote:
Dear list,
I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
[;
Just think like that: a message selector can't be a number (or pointer), that's
why [1( automatically gets a "float" selector and [1 foo bar( automatically
gets the "list" selector. Otherwise, the first item is the selector, so [foo
bar( is a "foo" message, but [symbol foo( is a symbol message.
* IOhannes m zmölnig [2019-11-26 16:03]:
> Am 26. November 2019 15:49:07 MEZ schrieb Roman Haefeli :
> >On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 15:12 +0100, Csaba Láng wrote:
> >> Dear list,
> >>
> >> I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
> >>
> >> [;
> >> pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
> >
Thanks, so simple, so powerful :)
Works perfectly!
Popesz
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 3:42 PM Claude Heiland-Allen
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 26/11/2019 14:12, Csaba Láng wrote:
> > Dear list,
> >
> > I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
> >
> > [;
> > pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
helo,
I don't understand why most people use send and receive object all the time
exept when sending message to pd.
I think > [;
pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
is very confusing.
having :
[open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
|
[send pd]
is lot's more logic.
moreover, you can add a print and see what
Do apoligize,
both symbol and list works fine!
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 3:58 PM Csaba Láng wrote:
> list cat works, for some reason symbol does not.
> But what if I have a lot of patches to open, and not only cat :) how can I
> make it interchangeable? [list $1( what command should get to open an
Am 26. November 2019 15:49:07 MEZ schrieb Roman Haefeli :
>On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 15:12 +0100, Csaba Láng wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
>>
>> [;
>> pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
>
>[...]
>
>> just to be clear, if I want to open cat.pd, a me
list cat works, for some reason symbol does not.
But what if I have a lot of patches to open, and not only cat :) how can I
make it interchangeable? [list $1( what command should get to open any
other namings?
On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 3:51 PM Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 15:12 +01
On Tue, 2019-11-26 at 15:12 +0100, Csaba Láng wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
>
> [;
> pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
[...]
> just to be clear, if I want to open cat.pd, a message [cat( will not
> make it happen.
Use [symbol cat(.
Read about
Hi,
On 26/11/2019 14:12, Csaba Láng wrote:
Dear list,
I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
[;
pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
With simple naming of the patches such as numbers, works beautifully.
However if the name is a word, I cannot open them. What kind of
command sh
Dear list,
I want to open from a pd patch a pd patch withe the message:
[;
pd open $1.pd /path-topatch;(
With simple naming of the patches such as numbers, works beautifully.
However if the name is a word, I cannot open them. What kind of command
should I send to this message to make it work?
j
+1
Quoting Christof Ressi :
anyhow: i think the way forward is to make the shortcuts
user-configurable, so everybody can map whatever they prefer to any
menu-option.
+1
Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. November 2019 um 12:15 Uhr
Von: "IOhannes m zmölnig"
An: pd-list@lists.iem.at
Betreff: Re: [PD] f
> anyhow: i think the way forward is to make the shortcuts
> user-configurable, so everybody can map whatever they prefer to any
> menu-option.
+1
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. November 2019 um 12:15 Uhr
> Von: "IOhannes m zmölnig"
> An: pd-list@lists.iem.at
> Betreff: Re: [PD] find last error bring
On 11/25/19 9:00 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> Personally, I use this so often it would warrant its own keyboard
> shortcut.
i use this so seldomly, that i wouldn't have thought about adding a
keyboard shortcut.
anyhow: i think the way forward is to make the shortcuts
user-configurable, so everybod
16 matches
Mail list logo
