Nope.. the machine broke... I can't build for PPC anymore. (But I doubt
it will make much difference now).
cheers
M
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 08:57:33PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> I see we have 0.51-0 for old PPC Macintoshes but not 0.51-2 in
> http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.html -
I see we have 0.51-0 for old PPC Macintoshes but not 0.51-2 in
http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.html - well, I'm assuming Miller forgot to
upload 0.51-2, right?
cheers
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
On 2020-09-25 19:33, Miller Puckette via Pd-list wrote:
> but for now the only way to do that is launch two processes (which you can
> connect with netsend/netreceive).
but you cannot launch a 2nd Pd from within running instance (at least
not with vanilla means), whereas [pd~] does allow
btw, would it be thinkable to add the possibility to run the pd~
subprocess asynchronously?
This would be definitely possible. I think you only need to set the pipe
read end in the parent process to non-blocking. The parent process tries
to read the subprocess output and sends a block of
For now pd~ is synchronous regardless of whether there are input/output
audio signals or not. I've been thinking about making an async possibility,
but for now the only way to do that is launch two processes (which you can
connect with netsend/netreceive).
There is a realtime object by which a
btw, would it be thinkable to add the possibility to run the pd~ subprocess
asynchronously?
Think of a subprocess running a large Gem patch, that would potentially
produce large CPU spikes;
you don't really care if this subprocess sometimes gets late, while you
absolutely need the calling process
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 13:41 +0200, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 12:18 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
> > doing quick benchmarks gives the following results:
> >
> > > implemtation | time (length=10) |
> > > --|--|
> > > 1
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 12:18 +0200, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
> doing quick benchmarks gives the following results:
>
> > implemtation | time (length=10) |
> > --|--|
> > 1 (repack/array) | 1.8ms|
> > 2 (repack/tab) | 9.9ms
The "delay" setting is in ms, but the "-fifo" argument is in blocks.
Note that the "delay" setting is only valid for the parent process. In
the subprocess, all audio settings from the menu are ignored because the
relevant settings are passed via the [pd~] object).
Christof
On 25.09.2020
On 2020-09-25 00:30, Benjamin ~ b01 wrote:
> hi,
>
> I'm looking for a fast way to convert two 8 bit data to one 16 bit data
> in big lists
> a device send continuously packets of 16 000 bytes threw the network to
> udpreceive
> at the moment, to reconstitute from two bytes a 16 bit value, I'm
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 00:30 +0200, Benjamin ~ b01 wrote
> [...] I'm using a list-drip [...]
This abstraction is from an pre-[list store]-era. Mathieu Bouchard went
to great lengths to optimize what was possible at the time, but there
was still no other way than to pass at least half of the list
On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 00:30 +0200, Benjamin ~ b01 wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a fast way to convert two 8 bit data to one 16 bit
> data
> in big lists
> a device send continuously packets of 16 000 bytes threw the network
> to
> udpreceive
> at the moment, to reconstitute from two bytes a 16 bit
Dear List,
Version 2 of the Click Tracker is out.
The main feature for this version is in the integration into *Max/MSP*
(Cycling '74).
You can now run the software in any of the following ways:
- as an android app (https://bit.ly/click-tracker-mob or
hello,
if you don't mind using eternals, you can put all data in a table, then use
tab_downsample from nusmuk_utils to create 2 tables with MSB and LSB, then the
iem_tab library will provide the other mathematical object to multiply 1st
table by 256 and add the other one.
It should perform
Em sex., 25 de set. de 2020 às 03:47, Peter P.
escreveu:
> You might also want to check the list archives
>
> https://lists.puredata.info/search?P=b16.long-varispeed=Pd-list=20=-1
Cool, but which thread exactly? I'm an active reader and if you're
referring to a thread you started yourself
* Alexandre Torres Porres [2020-09-25 08:38]:
> > I have [else/ramp~] and it has an internal "sum" variable which is a
> 'double',
> > and I see it works just great to generate indexes over that limit
>
> Ok, Matt Barber explained to me how has this doesn't really work and I was
> just
> I have [else/ramp~] and it has an internal "sum" variable which is a
'double',
> and I see it works just great to generate indexes over that limit
Ok, Matt Barber explained to me how has this doesn't really work and I was
just fooled... I couldn't hear it with a sine tone but some of the
17 matches
Mail list logo
