On 3/5/21 6:29 AM, William Huston wrote:
FYI, BH
- *"pd -help" produces no output, version 0.51-4 / Win7 #1280*
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1280
this issue has been resolved and closed.
it's a limitation of Windows' `cmd`.exe .
if you want to change it, i suggest fil
It finally came to me that when I put tabwrite~ into an abstraction I
can pause the array writing by stopping audio processing in that
abstraction using switch~. It also can loop by writing into the table
like into a ringbuffer. The other half of the issue is to also take
account for the write
Am 4. März 2021 23:11:33 MEZ schrieb oliver :
> IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
> >>
> >>
> yes, it does so on startup of PD, not on opening the deken window
>
>
(hopefully) fixed in deken-0.7.2, available via deken.
mfg.hft.fsl
IOhannes
___
Pd-list@
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 18:08 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
> (hopefully) fixed in deken-0.7.2, available via deken.
Works for me now on Windows 10. Thanks.
Roman
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
Pd-list@lists
Hello list, this is just a curiosity of mine
When we create [pd test] we can send messages to pd-test, so if i send
[;pd-test vis 1] it will show up.
But if i create an abstraction "test",
[; test vis 1] doesn't work, i am assuming that i need to put a namecanvas
there, but, is it possible to acc
On 3/5/21 6:49 PM, José de Abreu wrote:
Hello list, this is just a curiosity of mine
When we create [pd test] we can send messages to pd-test, so if i send
[;pd-test vis 1] it will show up.
But if i create an abstraction "test",
[; test vis 1] doesn't work, i am assuming that i need to put a na
On Fri, Mar 5, 2021 at 10:06 AM IOhannes m zmoelnig
wrote:
>
> > - *tabwrite should act sensibly upon out of bound address #1281*
> > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1281
>
> as explained in the issue, this is by design.
> if you hate it, just use [moses] to filter out the
One issue is that the 4 point interpolation isn't working where the
table playback is wrapped. In an earlier version I had two arrays and
was writing in both with a 50% offset, but that got ugly.
On 05.03.21 17:45, Max wrote:
It finally came to me that when I put tabwrite~ into an abstraction I
come to think of it: why do we have an issue (or three) open, if we keep
repeating the arguments here?
Am 5. März 2021 20:35:50 MEZ schrieb William Huston :
>
> It seems quite unexpected behavior, but yes I can do range checking.
i dont know.
its been there for 20+ years and I cannot remember
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 21:42 +0100, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>
> Am 5. März 2021 20:35:50 MEZ schrieb William Huston <
> williamahus...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > > https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/1279
> > >
> > Well, I don't think everyone did agree.
>
> sure, at least one disagre
10 matches
Mail list logo
