Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread Christof Ressi
My feelings on this interface are rather uniform: sending to all those #* symbols is ugly and tedious. I think the use case is valid, but I think we rather need a dedicated Pd message or object which directly puts messages on the MIDI queue, so they are automatically forwarded to the relevant

Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 3/19/21 12:23 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: what prevents us from making this official and documented? :) for one thing: i have very mixed feelings about this kind of interface. gmfdsr IOhannes OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 3/19/21 12:23 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: what prevents us from making this official and documented? :) for one thing: i have very mixed feelings about this kind of interface. gmfdsr IOhannes OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread Dan Wilcox
Hehe, I use those all the time... :) > On Mar 19, 2021, at 12:24 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Message: 5 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 20:23:37 -0300 > From: Alexandre Torres Porres mailto:por...@gmail.com>> > To: Christof Ressi mailto:i...@christofressi.com>> > Cc: Pd-List

[PD] [PD-announce] netpd 2.3.0 released

2021-03-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi netpd 2.3.0 is released. This release features also stand-alone applications for macOS and Windows. Features and changes: - * give chat and unpatch a facelift * load instruments from scroll list instead of openpanel * support unlimited nesting of dynamic loading

Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
what prevents us from making this official and documented? :) Em qui., 18 de mar. de 2021 às 11:41, Christof Ressi escreveu: > This is neither documented nor official, but you can forward MIDI events > by sending to the following special symbols: > > #midiin > > #sysexin > > #notein > > #ctlin

Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread Jean-Yves Gratius
Hi Christof This is neither documented nor official, but you can forward MIDI events by sending to the following special symbols: #midiin #sysexin #notein Thanks, that is exactly what I was looking for ! JYG On 18/03/2021 15:26, Jean-Yves Gratius wrote: Hi, Is there a way / trick to

Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread Lucas Cordiviola
Smells to me that the sub-process must be started with midi flags: ~~~ MIDI configuration flags: -midiindev ...   -- midi in device list; e.g., "1,3" for first and third -midioutdev ...  -- midi out device list, same format -mididev ... -- specify -midioutdev and

Re: [PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread Christof Ressi
This is neither documented nor official, but you can forward MIDI events by sending to the following special symbols: #midiin #sysexin #notein #ctlin #pgmin #bendin #touchin #polytouchin #midirealtimein The relevant part of the source code is x_midi_newpdinstance() Christof Am

[PD] pd~ and midiin objects

2021-03-18 Thread Jean-Yves Gratius
Hi, Is there a way / trick to forward midi events from the main pd instance to a pd~ subprocess, so that ctlin / notein etc.. objects work in the subprocess patch  ? Thanks JYG ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and

Re: [PD] symbols with zero paddings and spaces

2021-03-18 Thread Christof Ressi
I think it should work using "normal" escaping mechanisms The shell does all the escaping it needs to do before passing the argument string vector to the program (in Oliver's case the 'echo' program). ie. "quoted" strings end up as symbols in Pd. pdsend gets its messages from stdin, which is an

Re: [PD] Pduino 0.7 compatibility with Pd vanilla

2021-03-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
Hi Gilles On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 12:57 +0100, Gilles Marivier wrote: > > Hi, I'm back on the project using Pduino. I tested the new release > (thanks Roman). There's still the digital input #7 problem with the > Nano (168 or 368). > > Problem description : although sending message "pinMode 7

Re: [PD] Pduino 0.7 compatibility with Pd vanilla

2021-03-18 Thread Gilles Marivier
Le 04/01/2021 à 23:24, Roman Haefeli a écrit : On Wed, 2020-12-23 at 14:52 +0100, Gilles Marivier wrote: >> Le 23/12/2020 à 12:24, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit : >>> On 12/23/20 11:33 AM, Gilles Marivier wrote: hello, thank you. Le 23/12/2020 à 10:51, IOhannes m zmoelnig a écrit

Re: [PD] Formatted datetime message

2021-03-18 Thread Dan Wilcox
+1 This is what I was going to suggest. I agree it would be nice to have some sort of date/time utility built in, especially as it's part of C / Posix as far as I know. > On Mar 18, 2021, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2021 10:29:37 +0100 >

Re: [PD] symbols with zero paddings and spaces

2021-03-18 Thread Dan Wilcox
My thoughts too. I think it should work using "normal" escaping mechanisms on the command line and lead to predictable results, ie. "quoted" strings end up as symbols in Pd. The fault could also lie in pesend which should do the escaping before sending as well. > On Mar 18, 2021, at 10:29 AM,

Re: [PD] Formatted datetime message

2021-03-18 Thread Nicolas Montgermont
Thanks Roman, Here is a working example for archive. n Le 18/03/2021 à 10:29, Roman Haefeli a écrit : On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 09:57 +0100, Nicolas Montgermont wrote: I was wondering what is the best (as in easiest/cleaner/vaniller) way to produce a filename with formatted date inside these

Re: [PD] providing object-lists for old deken packages (Re: restrict "find externals" to exact matches)

2021-03-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 20:13 -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Now, ggee has a > repository that you collaborated on => > https://github.com/pd-externals/ggee So... yeah, you've already > uploaded a new version of ggee to deken, so maybe you can get a new > version or the object list with

Re: [PD] Trigger question

2021-03-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 3/17/21 6:29 PM, adam johnson wrote: and i was only saying that just because something is implemented in such-and-such way should be of no concern. A feature not existing because of the difficulty of adding it would be one possible answer to my question, so I checked the code before coming

Re: [PD] Formatted datetime message

2021-03-18 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Thu, 2021-03-18 at 09:57 +0100, Nicolas Montgermont wrote: > I was wondering what is the best (as in easiest/cleaner/vaniller) way > to > produce a filename with formatted date inside these days. > producing that kind of message with a bang: > MMDD-HHMMSS I don't think there is a

Re: [PD] Multiple audio outputs on a single-board computer ?

2021-03-18 Thread Pierre Massat
Thank you all for your replies. I didn't even know surround soundcards existed. This looks promising given my budget. In the meantime I found this : https://shop.audioinjector.net/detail/Sound_Cards/Octo+RCA+sound+card Anybody has experience using it with Pd ? Cheers, Pierre. 2021-03-17 17:53

[PD] Formatted datetime message

2021-03-18 Thread Nicolas Montgermont
hello PD, I was wondering what is the best (as in easiest/cleaner/vaniller) way to produce a filename with formatted date inside these days. producing that kind of message with a bang: MMDD-HHMMSS Thanks in advance! Best n ___

Re: [PD] Trigger question

2021-03-18 Thread cyrille henry
hello, [trigger b b b b] |||| DCBA will do to A, B, C and D. if you want to do C and D only depending of the result of B, the best "pd" solution is not to stop the trigger. You should use 2 trigger : [trigger b b] || BA | [test result] | [select 1] | [trigger b

Re: [PD] symbols with zero paddings and spaces

2021-03-18 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 3/17/21 2:25 PM, Christof Ressi wrote: Note the different position of the backslash! I'm not sure if this particular escaping behavior is actually intended or just works by chance... Generally, it would be great to document Pd's string escaping, because it is not entirely obvious.