], [keyup] and operating system key reapat
Hi everyone, IOhannes,
* IOhannes m zmoelnig [2022-05-04 08:40]:
>
> On 5/4/22 08:04, Peter P. wrote:
> > It would be great to have more unified behavior since so much work has
> > already gone into this issue.
>
> i guess this
; Subject: Re: [PD] [key], [keyup] and operating system key reapat
> Message-ID: <mailto:f121dc43-8951-496c-f88b-654dbf920...@iem.at>>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> PS: i'm happy to fix bugs in the Pd sources; but unlike Dan, I am *on
On 5/4/22 09:49, Peter P. wrote:
>> i guess this would be great for many users of Tcl/Tk.
>> you might want to file a (wishlist) bug there.
> If this doesn't provoke nightmares I'd be happy to do, perhaps for
> documentation purposes only.
it won't provoke nightmares for me (as i wouldn't even
Hi everyone, IOhannes,
* IOhannes m zmoelnig [2022-05-04 08:40]:
>
> On 5/4/22 08:04, Peter P. wrote:
> > It would be great to have more unified behavior since so much work has
> > already gone into this issue.
>
> i guess this would be great for many users of Tcl/Tk.
> you might want to file
On 5/4/22 08:04, Peter P. wrote:
It would be great to have more unified behavior since so much work has
already gone into this issue.
i guess this would be great for many users of Tcl/Tk.
you might want to file a (wishlist) bug there.
gdmasdr
IOhannes
PS: i'm happy to fix bugs in the Pd
Dear Sebastian,
* Sebastian Shader via Pd-list [2022-05-03 21:55]:
> I might be mistaking what you're saying but, on OSX if key repeats are off in
> the system preferences (at least when pd starts) then they will not repeat
> from the [key] & [keyname] objects
Thanks for clarifying, yes, I
Dear oliver, dear list,
* oliver [2022-05-03 18:05]:
> Peter P. wrote:
> > Dear Dan and everyone contributing to this issue,
> >
> > I kinda felt this is a sensitive topic but was not aware of the amount
> > of frustrating work that has already gone into it. Every bit of it is
> > much
7 am
Subject: Re: [PD] [key], [keyup] and operating system key reapat
Dear Dan and everyone contributing to this issue,
I kinda felt this is a sensitive topic but was not aware of the amount
of frustrating work that has already gone into it. Every bit of it is
much appreciated, thank you and ever
Peter P. wrote:
Dear Dan and everyone contributing to this issue,
I kinda felt this is a sensitive topic but was not aware of the amount
of frustrating work that has already gone into it. Every bit of it is
much appreciated, thank you and everyone a lot!
So if I would want to write a patch
gt;>
> > To: pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>
> > Subject: Re: [PD] [key], [keyup] and operating system key reapat
> > Message-ID: <20220501165034.sq22mbyufuza5...@fastmail.com
> > <mailto:20220501165034.sq22mbyufuza5...@fastmail.com>>
May 2, 2022, at 12:00 PM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote:
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 1 May 2022 18:50:34 +0200
> From: "Peter P." mailto:peterpar...@fastmail.com>>
> To: pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>
> Subject: Re: [PD] [key], [keyup
* Peter P. [2022-05-01 18:44]:
[...]
> Shouldn't/couldn't the filtering of repeated note-ons be done within the
> objects on Win and OS X at least?
Oh, just saw this issue
https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/issues/945
and several related others. Seems complicated and a lot of work has gone
om: Peter P.
> To: pd-list
> Sent: Thu, Apr 28, 2022 10:38 pm
> Subject: [PD] [key], [keyup] and operating system key reapat
>
> Hi list,
>
> I can't seem to get my head around different behavior of the [key] and
> [keyup] objects on different OSes and even within the
in the system preferences)
-seb
-Original Message-
From: Peter P.
To: pd-list
Sent: Thu, Apr 28, 2022 10:38 pm
Subject: [PD] [key], [keyup] and operating system key reapat
Hi list,
I can't seem to get my head around different behavior of the [key] and
[keyup] objects on different OSes
Pd 0.52-2 pressing and holding a key:
Windows11 (Tk 8.6.10 amd64)
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
key: 106
keyup: 106
Debian11 (Tk 8.6.11 amd64)
key: 106
keyup: 106
key: 106
keyup: 106
key: 106
keyup: 106
key: 106
keyup: 106
key: 106
keyup: 106
Hi list,
I can't seem to get my head around different behavior of the [key] and
[keyup] objects on different OSes and even within the same OS. I
discovered that for depressed keys after an initial delay
-Pd on Debian will report repeated key ups and downs,
-Pd on Windows does not,
-Pd on OS X
16 matches
Mail list logo
