On Sun, 2016-03-20 at 23:42 +, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> That's a good reason for doing a physical release of the GUI port on
> CD ROM.
I know you are joking. Still, let me put it this way: They want you to
show their ASIO logo everywhere you provide your software, on the
physical package or on
That's a good reason for doing a physical release of the GUI port on CD ROM.
-Jonathan
On Sunday, March 20, 2016 4:13 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
On Sam, 2016-03-19 at 19:03 +, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
>
>
> As for the README-- they actually don't require the
On Sam, 2016-03-19 at 19:03 +, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
>
>
> As for the README-- they actually don't require the whole email dance
> to get the code anymore:
> http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/developers.html
>
>
>
> Not sure whether this means I can skip the da
Ok, thanks.
As for the README-- they actually don't require the whole email dance to get
the code anymore:http://www.steinberg.net/en/company/developers.html
Not sure whether this means I can skip the dance if I'm distributing binaries
build using that...
-Jonathan
On Saturday, March 19,
Yes and yes... I'm using the 'official ASIO SDK 2.3, which I can't distribute
the source or header files for. Details in pd/asio/README.txt (although I
see I didn't update the version number in the README).
cheers
Miller
On Sat, Mar 19, 2016 at 04:17:53PM +, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote
Miller,Is the Windows binary you ship for Pd compiled using the ASIO SDK from
Steinberg?
If so, did you have to sign some licensing garbage in order to do that?
Thanks,Jonathan___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
h
