Sorry--I left out this one: xcov-2048
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 5:11 PM, Charles Z Henry wrote:
> Hi Mario,
>
> I know how to solve this problem, but I'm only part-way there. I have a
> similar problem, rejecting feedback when processing acoustic instruments.
> I'm sorry I didn't post what I've got
Hi Mario,
I know how to solve this problem, but I'm only part-way there. I have a
similar problem, rejecting feedback when processing acoustic instruments.
I'm sorry I didn't post what I've got sooner--it needs some more work. I
can't really tell if I'll be finished with a decent patch soon.
I'
Yes, as I said in the mail, not only the the time of the delay is very
very short that it would be very difficult for me to find "at hand",
also, as you say, this time would be variable. My system don't work... I
knew it.
I took a look to some pages (*), but I only understand... the title of
You're not likely to get very good results with just a single delay. The
way these systems normally work (e.g. on phones and conferencing
systems) is to continuously estimate the transfer function between the
speaker and the microphone (impulse response in the time domain). Then
you take the receiv
* Mario Mey [2015-05-04 10:18]:
[...]
> How can I acchieve an echo suppresor? Is this possible?
Good acoustic echo cancellation (AEC) is quite a substantial topic.
Perhaps http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1146062
could serve as a good introductory text. Search the usual scient
Hi, there. 2 years ago, I created this thread on the forum:
http://forum.pdpatchrepo.info/topic/7340/echo-supressor. After talking
about dBs, I thought I acchived what I was looking for. But no. Nor close.
My last non-replied post on september 2014 says:
/Bringing back to life an old thread...
