Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list
> So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a > faster mac > or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the > GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been > having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrDat

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-03 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 10/03/2017 07:08 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote: > That feature doesn't currently exist, though it's fairly trivial to > implement. (I believe > DesireData had it.) Pd has it as well: https://git.iem.at/pd-gui/punish gfmrdsa IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital sign

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-03 Thread Esa Ruoho
So basically I guess you're telling me that I should either 1) upgrade to a faster mac or 2) move from using PurrData to using PureData Vanilla, to get rid of the GOP-within-GOP-within-GOP -induced CPU spikes and high CPU usage I've been having with my mid-2009 MacBookPro with PurrData? On 3 Octob

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
2017-10-03 14:08 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes : > > > I'd be much more interested in a feature that automatically encapsulates > the current selection inside an abstraction. > This is exactly what I believe I've seen a while back, maybe in pd-l2ork 1.0? There was even an youtube video showing it? My

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-03 Thread Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list
> I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo, > arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to > automatically encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr > data? I saw something once where you could select > a portion of the patch and do it

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-03 Thread Alexandre Torres Porres
I like how Pd-l2ork/Purr Data has many new features, like infinite undo, arrays with bars. By the way, what's the shortcut to automatically encapsulate a part of your patch as a subpatch in pd-lork/purr data? I saw something once where you could select a portion of the patch and do it. cheers 201

Re: [PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-03 Thread Roman Haefeli
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:07 -0400, Ivica Bukvic wrote: >  > > This is why Pd-l2ork/Purr-Data has had for at least 2-3 years the > -legacy startup flag that ensures iemgui widgets are inconsistently > offset to match the vanilla behavior plus some other similarly > inconsistent behaviors... Ah, th

[PD] Fwd: Re: why not Purr Data?

2017-10-02 Thread Ivica Bukvic
Forgot to copy list... -- Ivica Ico Bukvic, D.M.A. Associate Professor Computer Music ICAT Senior Fellow Director -- DISIS, L2Ork Virginia Tech School of Performing Arts – 0141 Blacksburg, VA 24061 (540) 231-6139 i...@vt.edu www.performingarts.vt.edu disis.icat.vt.edu l2ork.icat.vt.edu ico.bukvic