Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

[sidenote] Wowsa -- Dynamo is bloody awesome, love it Claude. On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 at 15:22, Claude Heiland-Allen wrote: > On 05/12/2019 21:55, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > > Tests should be done with "vanilla-only" patches. 99% of externals were > > not compiled for double-precision so they don't

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

On 05/12/2019 21:55, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: Tests should be done with "vanilla-only" patches. 99% of externals were not compiled for double-precision so they don't work with this Pd. If you find something not working write back here to the list or issue it to github (prepend "double-precision:

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

Hi William, Reading your lines makes me think you missed that there is a Windows version. Its below in this thread: Here anyway : http://lucarda.com.ar/x/Pd-double-w64-testing.zip :) Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. On 12/7/19 2:08 AM, William Huston wrote: > This makes me very

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

This makes me very happy! I will be happy to test a Windows version of this! :) -- William Huston: williamahus...@gmail.com Binghamton NY *Public Service Mapping / Videography / Research / Education / Safety Advocacy* Blog -- Facebook

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

done Em sex., 6 de dez. de 2019 às 14:32, Lucas Cordiviola escreveu: > Alex, > > Tell the facebook people that we know there are troubles writing 16 or > 24 bit audio files and for the linux users that they have to compile the > branch with: > > ./autogen.sh > ./configure

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

Alex, Tell the facebook people that we know there are troubles writing 16 or 24 bit audio files and for the linux users that they have to compile the branch with: ./autogen.sh ./configure CPPFLAGS=-DPD_FLOATSIZE=64 make make app -- Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. On 12/6/2019

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

awesome, just posted binaries on the facebook group so people can test it Em sex., 6 de dez. de 2019 às 07:07, Dan Wilcox escreveu: > There is a double precision test build for macOS here: > http://docs.danomatika.com/pdbuilds/0.51/ > > As development continues, I will throw additional test

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

There is a double precision test build for macOS here: http://docs.danomatika.com/pdbuilds/0.51/ As development continues, I will throw additional test builds up there. > On Dec 6, 2019, at 12:13 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > Hi all, >

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

On 12/5/2019 9:02 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > I have 0 patches thar are 100% vanilla to test :/ I'd rather compile > 'ELSE' for 64 bits, but then I'd probably fail in doing so and also > will end up finding issues in ELSE only, haha... Yes, the first surgery must be done in Pd and

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

Em qui., 5 de dez. de 2019 às 19:29, Lucas Cordiviola Tests should be done with "vanilla-only" patches. 99% of externals were > not compiled for double-precision so they don't work with this Pd. I have 0 patches thar are 100% vanilla to test :/ I'd rather compile 'ELSE' for 64 bits, but then

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

Thanks Lucas! I'll do some testing! On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 23:30 Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > Hi all, > > There is an experimental branch[1] on Pd-double-precision[2]. > > So far we know a couple of things not working yet like writing audio > files with [soundfiler] or [writesf~]. > > If anyone is

Re: [PD] Pd double precision testing.

On 12/5/2019 7:41 PM, Edwin van der Heide wrote: > Is there also a macOS version or should I compile it myself? I'm not a macOS user but you can compile it. Sources are here : https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/tree/double-precision If you have xcode installed do: ~~ cd path/to/pd

[PD] Pd double precision testing.

Hi all, There is an experimental branch[1] on Pd-double-precision[2]. So far we know a couple of things not working yet like writing audio files with [soundfiler] or [writesf~]. If anyone is willing to test and find something else not working we welcome and appreciate it. Here's a Windows64