Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-05 Thread Dan Wilcox
> On Jan 5, 2017, at 2:08 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > From: IOhannes m zmölnig mailto:zmoel...@iem.at>> > Subject: Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48) > Date: January 4, 2017 at 12:51:31 PM MST > To: pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@lis

Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-05 Thread Miller Puckette
l > > > > > > From: Scott R. Looney > To: pd-list > Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2017, 9:07 > Subject: Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48) > > actually, i was curious about that myself but sort of on both tangents. at > the higher

Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-05 Thread Giulio Moro via Pd-list
https://lists.puredata.info/pipermail/pd-list/2016-09/116224.html From: Scott R. Looney To: pd-list Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2017, 9:07 Subject: Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48) actually, i was curious about that myself but sort of on both tangents. at the highe

Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-05 Thread Scott R. Looney
actually, i was curious about that myself but sort of on both tangents. at the higher end i'm using Unity and PD vanilla via Kalimba and would definitely like to use it without involving too much extra as it is in that situation. but the embedded factor is pretty important too. i've been checking

Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-04 Thread Peter Nyboer
> another wishlist from my side (which I wanted to address at PdCon16~ but > somehow didn't manage). > would it be possible to include the libpd glue into the proper Pd sources? Funny - I had a somewhat tangential thought this morning. Something to the effect of it being easier to deploy libpd o

Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-04 Thread IOhannes m zmölnig
On 01/04/2017 04:02 PM, Dan Wilcox wrote: > > > >> On Jan 4, 2017, at 4:00 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: >> >> the important question is of course, whether the various language >> wrappers would be able to use a common libpd.so - if not, the entire >> exercise might be moot. > > On pl

Re: [PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-04 Thread Dan Wilcox
> On Jan 4, 2017, at 4:00 AM, pd-list-requ...@lists.iem.at wrote: > > the important question is of course, whether the various language > wrappers would be able to use a common libpd.so - if not, the entire > exercise might be moot. On platforms with dynamic linking (*nix, non-iOS), this shoul

[PD] include libpd? (Re: plans for Pd 0.48)

2017-01-04 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
On 2017-01-01 21:32, Miller Puckette wrote: > This is a long list [...] another wishlist from my side (which I wanted to address at PdCon16~ but somehow didn't manage). would it be possible to include the libpd glue into the proper Pd sources? i'm only talking about the C-part of libpd as found in