% can be different with respect to sign in different implementations of C.
fmod() in C is designed to work with floats.
On my system, -10 [mod 3] and -10 [% 3] in Pd work differently. [mod]
outputs the positive remainder, which is 2, while % outputs the remainder
with the sign of the dividend, wh
I _think_ (but am not sure) that "%" works differently on different
CPU architectures.
cheers
Miller
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 06:27:33PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> 2016-05-07 14:53 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette :
>
> > I put in a sentence to scare users away from "%". Use "mod" instea
2016-05-07 14:53 GMT-03:00 Miller Puckette :
> I put in a sentence to scare users away from "%". Use "mod" instead :)
>
oh, but I can't see it, so you just did it now, right?
I know they differ for negative values input, never knew why the reason..
expr also has a "%" function that behaves in
I put in a sentence to scare users away from "%". Use "mod" instead :)
M
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 12:37:18PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> howdy, I can see it in the sourceforge you updated the help files, cool.
>
> but in the otherbinops-help.pd I still don't see the [%] object
>
> ch
howdy, I can see it in the sourceforge you updated the help files, cool.
but in the otherbinops-help.pd I still don't see the [%] object
cheers
2016-05-05 23:24 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres :
> So i did browse though all the help files again to see if I could find
> anything else, here it
Hello,
[makefilename] N-Tuple substitution example :)
m
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres
wrote:
> So i did browse though all the help files again to see if I could find
> anything else, here it is:
>
> [%], [mod] and [div] call the otherbinops-help file, but none of the
