[PD] name of latency measurement algorithm
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:09 +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> * Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 13:52]:
> > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 13:21 +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> > > * Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 11:58]:
> > > > Hey all
> > > >
> >
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 15:09 +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> * Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 13:52]:
> > On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 13:21 +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> > > * Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 11:58]:
> > > > Hey all
> > > >
> > > > I once read about a simple and robust way to perform latency
> > > >
* Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 13:52]:
> On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 13:21 +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> > * Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 11:58]:
> > > Hey all
> > >
> > > I once read about a simple and robust way to perform latency
> > > measurements with an audio signal.
> > >
> > > Explained in a few
On Thu, 2018-12-13 at 13:21 +0100, Peter P. wrote:
> * Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 11:58]:
> > Hey all
> >
> > I once read about a simple and robust way to perform latency
> > measurements with an audio signal.
> >
> > Explained in a few words, the test signal consists of a sweeping
> > sine
> >
* Roman Haefeli [2018-12-13 11:58]:
> Hey all
>
> I once read about a simple and robust way to perform latency
> measurements with an audio signal.
>
> Explained in a few words, the test signal consists of a sweeping sine
> tone. The return signal ring-modulates the source signal and the
>
Hey all
I once read about a simple and robust way to perform latency
measurements with an audio signal.
Explained in a few words, the test signal consists of a sweeping sine
tone. The return signal ring-modulates the source signal and the
resulting signal consists of two frequencies, the sum (
