Re: [PD] one more filter

It's astounishing, this filter doesn't only sound like the SSM2040 chip, this patch also look like it's circuit implementation. http://www.schmitzbits.de/rs2040.html Le 22/02/2016 10:39, cyrille henry a écrit : yes, thanks. corrected on the svn. cheers c Le 22/02/2016 08:06, i go bananas a

Re: [PD] one more filter

yes, thanks. corrected on the svn. cheers c Le 22/02/2016 08:06, i go bananas a écrit : you need $0 prefacing the delwrite~_delread~ names, or otherwise you can't load multiple instances. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 3:55 PM, i go bananas > wrote:

Re: [PD] one more filter

Le 22/02/2016 06:31, i go bananas a écrit : looks great! thanks. just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead of multiplying the distortion outputs by [1, -2, 1, 0, 0 ] , you need to multiply by [0.5, -1, 0.5, 0, 0], then you get the same amplitude for the highpass as the

Re: [PD] one more filter

oops, ignore that comment about the lowpass and bandpass modes not working. It was my patching mistake. sorry! ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

Re: [PD] one more filter

I seem to get the exact same output when using either of the 2 lowpass modes and the bandpass mode. Only the highpass seems different. On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 2:31 PM, i go bananas wrote: > looks great! thanks. > > just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead

Re: [PD] one more filter

looks great! thanks. just noticed that the highpass output is too hot. instead of multiplying the distortion outputs by [1, -2, 1, 0, 0 ] , you need to multiply by [0.5, -1, 0.5, 0, 0], then you get the same amplitude for the highpass as the other modes. I'm gonna see what it sounds like to