Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

:45:40 +0200 > From: Christof Ressi mailto:i...@christofressi.com>> > To: Pd-List mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> > Subject: Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released > Message-ID: <5574942c-7f70-18be-5c5f-601a1122b...@christofressi.com > <mailto:5574942c-7f70-

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

Oops, that's a debugging message I neglected to remove. I'll fix that in the next pdmax~.. not sure if it's worth grinding out a whole Pd release just to fix that, but maybe... :) M On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 09:57:14AM +0200, Jo??o Pais wrote: > seems to work, great. > > But: would it make

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

I have to shamefully admit that I do something similar: rename the "po" to "po_" :-) On 09.09.2020 11:41, oliver wrote: João Pais wrote: a new question: I have a german windows, but I prefer to have Pd in english. For that, I use a batch script with "set LANG=en" when starting Pd. Is that

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

João Pais wrote: a new question: I have a german windows, but I prefer to have Pd in english. For that, I use a batch script with "set LANG=en" when starting Pd. Is that somehow possible with pd~, or it will always follow the OS language? zip and/or remove the "po" folder in PD's main folder

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

a new question: I have a german windows, but I prefer to have Pd in english. For that, I use a batch script with "set LANG=en" when starting Pd. Is that somehow possible with pd~, or it will always follow the OS language? On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 09:57, João Pais wrote: > seems to work, great. > >

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

seems to work, great. But: would it make sense to have a -quiet flag where stdout text "pd~ version 0.53, start 1, start 2" doesn't appear - but this is a small detail, it's also ok if they remain. And, what do the "start" flags mean? On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 00:04, Miller Puckette wrote: > Yep,

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

It's just changing pd.com to pd.exe in the pd~ code It might be nice to have an option to choose between both behaviors (with/without console). Often the console window is annoying, but sometimes it's very useful for debugging! Christof On 09.09.2020 00:04, Miller Puckette via Pd-list wrote:

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

Yep, I think this is worth putting out a Pd 0.51-2 for (because there are also space-fixes for pd~ that are needed on pd, and I'd like to get this into Camomile so I can finally make a pd~ plugin that pops up a real Pd GUI :) Meanwhile, I just put out pdmax 0.53 for both Mac and PC. cheers

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

is it possible to do it also in Pd itself? Probably that's why all this time there was always an extra window when I run Pd. On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 20:20, Miller Puckette wrote: > (It's just changing pd.com to pd.exe in the pd~ code. But meanwhile I'm > trying also to fix the space-in-path

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

(It's just changing pd.com to pd.exe in the pd~ code. But meanwhile I'm trying also to fix the space-in-path trouble too.) On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 11:18:33AM -0700, Miller Puckette via Pd-list wrote: > That's my fault... I need to push out a fix. > > M > > On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 07:37:02PM

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

That's my fault... I need to push out a fix. M On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 07:37:02PM +0200, Jo??o Pais wrote: > It's working on max 6, windows 7. > But: when I run with -nogui, the command window still appears. Is there a > way to avoid it that I never knew about? > > On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 03:47,

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

It's working on max 6, windows 7. But: when I run with -nogui, the command window still appears. Is there a way to avoid it that I never knew about? On Tue, 8 Sep 2020 at 03:47, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > Here's a version for Windows if anyone is willing to test: > >

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

Here's a version for Windows if anyone is willing to test: https://nc.nubegris.com.ar/index.php/s/Aas6oAEYakaMqWf I have tested it with "Max for Live" and its working also with the -nogui flag. Let us know if you found something.

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

I can finish the compilation with more warnings than on 0.4. The object loads fine but when I start the sub-process I get a crash. Attached are the compiler(MINGW64 - gcc) warnings. I'm testing on "Max for Live (Max 8)" on Win10. Note: I have to do on line 50: ~ #ifdef _WIN32 #include

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

This sounds suspiciously like a problem I had with an rtcmix~ update. This has to be set: x->ob.z_misc |= Z_NO_INPLACE; not well documented at all. I wasted about a week of my life trying to figure out what the heck was going on. brad On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 1:51 PM Miller Puckette via Pd-list

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

oops, sorry, try again :) M On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 06:12:58PM -0300, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > I'm getting a "File not found" at link > http://msp.ucsd.edu/Software/pdmax~-0.5.tgz > > > -- > > Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. > > On 9/5/2020 5:49 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: > > OK,

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

I'm getting a "File not found" at link http://msp.ucsd.edu/Software/pdmax~-0.5.tgz -- Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. On 9/5/2020 5:49 PM, Miller Puckette wrote: OK, that should be fixed... along with quite a few other oopses. Now available as version 0.5 - on the usual,

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

I never saw this behavior on my machine... but the new version fixes several problames and might have fixed this if we're lucky. cheers Miller On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 11:34:41AM +0200, jayrope wrote: > Thank you, Miller, for looking into this > > Using pd~ 0.4 in Max 7.34 with PD 0.50-2 on Mac

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - version 0.5 released

OK, that should be fixed... along with quite a few other oopses. Now available as version 0.5 - on the usual, msp.ucsd.edu cheers Miller On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 07:08:35PM -0300, Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > > On 9/3/2020 3:03 PM, Jo??o Pais wrote: > > strange, I tried both "pd~ start -nogui $1"

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

On 9/3/2020 3:03 PM, João Pais wrote: strange, I tried both "pd~ start -nogui $1" and "pd~ start $1 -nogui" and neither worked. The first doesn't start Pd~, the other starts with gui. Confirmed. I cant start a patch with -nogui. No white space in any path. Win10 Max for Live :(

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

> > > And I would already have one suggestion: would it be possible to add > > the -nogui or similar flags, so that Pd isn't visible when running? > > > you *can* start the sub-process with the -nogui flag. > strange, I tried both "pd~ start -nogui $1" and "pd~ start $1 -nogui" and neither

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

Thank you, Miller, for looking into this Using pd~ 0.4 in Max 7.34 with PD 0.50-2 on Mac OS 10.9. i find this error: [pd~ -ninsig 2 -noutsig 2 -fifo 10] leads to right channel (2) not receive anything from PD, while the max patch (same with the help file associated with pd~) the right channel

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

On 9/3/2020 4:34 AM, João Pais wrote: And I would already have one suggestion: would it be possible to add the -nogui or similar flags, so that Pd isn't visible when running? you *can* start the sub-process with the -nogui flag. (one later question would be if it would be possible to pack

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

Thanks Lucas! On Thu, Sep 3, 2020, 07:34 Lucas Cordiviola wrote: > If someone is willing to test [pd~] for MAX/MSP on Windows here's a > version for 64bit (both Pd and Max has to be 64bit). > > https://nc.nubegris.com.ar/index.php/s/yRawpTz9iod7ZmM > > I have tested on "Max for Live" and it

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

The help patch works on w10 + m8 + pd0.51. Maybe the next days I can test some other patches. And I would already have one suggestion: would it be possible to add the -nogui or similar flags, so that Pd isn't visible when running? (one later question would be if it would be possible to pack

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

yay, thanks Lucas. A question, when a final version is out, could the binaries for mac and windows be available in their respective distributions? Em qui., 3 de set. de 2020 às 02:34, Lucas Cordiviola escreveu: > If someone is willing to test [pd~] for MAX/MSP on Windows here's a > version for

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

If someone is willing to test [pd~] for MAX/MSP on Windows here's a version for 64bit (both Pd and Max has to be 64bit). https://nc.nubegris.com.ar/index.php/s/yRawpTz9iod7ZmM I have tested on "Max for Live" and it works. Report any issues back to the list and let us know. :) Mensaje

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

Hi Miller, On 9/2/2020 4:14 PM, Miller Puckette via Pd-list wrote: Anyone who wants to can compile and test on windows... I'll be happy to link to them if they want to share :) I got it working but I had to change line 50 of "pd~.c"  from "#include " to "#include " can this be fixed with

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

I knew it you'd take care of it Lucas ;) By the way, there's a typo in the help file, where you have "MASSAGE"-filenames  Em qua., 2 de set. de 2020 às 16:20, Lucas Cordiviola escreveu: > I'll try. Also i Just happen to have Max for Live to test. > > > :) > > Mensaje telepatico asistido por

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

I'll try. Also i Just happen to have Max for Live to test. :) Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas. On 9/2/2020 4:14 PM, Miller Puckette via Pd-list wrote: Anyone who wants to can compile and test on windows... I'll be happy to link to them if they want to share :) M On Wed, Sep 02,

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

Anyone who wants to can compile and test on windows... I'll be happy to link to them if they want to share :) M On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 02:47:25PM -0300, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > It's working super great for me, so no one will stop me :) > > by the way, are there plans to also provide a

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

It's working super great for me, so no one will stop me :) by the way, are there plans to also provide a windows binary on your website when all is great and good? thanks again, really stoked about this Em qua., 2 de set. de 2020 às 13:25, Miller Puckette via Pd-list < pd-list@lists.iem.at>

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - not really working yet

Fearless user Omar Costa Hamido has already found a crasher bug in pd~ - better hold off using it until I can figure this one out... cheers Miller On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 03:02:29PM +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: > On 02.09.20 10:47, alfonso santimone wrote: > > Great! Is there any source

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

Yep, you can just put a message box in the patch to tell Max where to find Pd (but that wouldn't have worked in the help file because it depends on your own file layout). Meanwhiel, on another thread, the thing still has a crash bug somewhere, so I'll have to put another version out soon. I

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

On 02.09.20 10:47, alfonso santimone wrote: > Great! Is there any source code available to try a Win64 build? thanks > it's in Pd's git repository. gf,adfs IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

Great! Is there any source code available to try a Win64 build? thanks On Wed, Sep 2, 2020, 09:32 João Pais wrote: > If a windows version is compiled, I can test it. > > Only looking at the help patch, I wanted to ask: is it possible to send > the Pd app location as a message, so that the user

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

If a windows version is compiled, I can test it. Only looking at the help patch, I wanted to ask: is it possible to send the Pd app location as a message, so that the user doesn't have to do it? OK, that was an ugly trip into MacOS-ness, but it's over for now at least... > > I've put a test

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

Even better: I just added jp.coll to jmmmp, so it's possible to have a vanilla version of coll in pd in max. On Wed, 2 Sep 2020 at 07:23, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > Wonderful, now people can finally use pd inside Max and use the Cyclone > library! > > Em qua., 2 de set. de 2020 às 00:57,

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

Em qua., 2 de set. de 2020 às 02:20, Alexandre Torres Porres < por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Wonderful, now people can finally use pd inside Max and use the Cyclone > library! > I guess this also means we can use Pd inside Max for Live, so one can use the cyclone library inside Max for Live as

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

Wonderful, now people can finally use pd inside Max and use the Cyclone library! Em qua., 2 de set. de 2020 às 00:57, Fede Camara Halac escreveu: > > Woa! This is great news! > > Thanks a lot, Miller! > > > > > fdch.github.io > > > On Sep 1, 2020, at 11:58 PM, Miller Puckette via Pd-list < >

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

Woa! This is great news! Thanks a lot, Miller! fdch.github.io > On Sep 1, 2020, at 11:58 PM, Miller Puckette via Pd-list > wrote: > ___ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp - test version available

OK, that was an ugly trip into MacOS-ness, but it's over for now at least... I've put a test version of Pd~ for Max 7 and/or 8 on the usual: http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.html Test away... note that people on the Jacktrip google group are asking about quacktrip in Max - this might be the easiest

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

If the externals are 64bits they work on Max 7-8, but if they are 32 bits only on Max 7. James On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 11:39, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > but you can go ahead try and make it run on 7 and we can test to see if it > works in 8 > > Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 11:36,

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Thanks - that tells me exactly what I needed to know :) M On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 01:55:57PM -0300, James Correa wrote: > If the externals are 64bits they work on Max 7-8, but if they are 32 bits > only on Max 7. > > James > > On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 at 11:39, Alexandre Torres Porres > wrote: > >

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

but you can go ahead try and make it run on 7 and we can test to see if it works in 8 Em ter., 25 de ago. de 2020 às 11:36, Alexandre Torres Porres < por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > Em seg., 24 de ago. de 2020 às 20:21, Miller Puckette via Pd-list < > pd-list@lists.iem.at> escreveu: > >> does

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Em seg., 24 de ago. de 2020 às 20:21, Miller Puckette via Pd-list < pd-list@lists.iem.at> escreveu: > does anyone out there know if Max 7 externs work on Max 8 as well? someone in the max facebook group tells me some work absolutely fine and some don't work at all... i'll try and ask why and

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Independent from that: you can install max 8 and just run it as demo, or even edit patches without saving. Just for testing, you don't need to get a license. Joao I have remote access to a mac with Max 7 on it, and I've been meaning at least to get pd~ running on that. We don't have Max 8

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

I have remote access to a mac with Max 7 on it, and I've been meaning at least to get pd~ running on that. We don't have Max 8 yet at UCSD... does anyone out there know if Max 7 externs work on Max 8 as well? thanks Miller On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 04:24:29PM +0200, Christof Ressi wrote: > That

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

That was probably tongue in cheek, but I would like to point out nevertheless that [pd~] is much more powerful than Camomile: it isn't constrained to the VST paradigm, you can easily use externals, etc. Christof On 24.08.2020 15:20, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: On 24.08.20 15:12, João Pais

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

On 24.08.20 15:12, João Pais wrote: > Btw, any news on this old thread? > i guess the canonical way these days is to use camomile to load Pd as a VST-plugin within Max. :-O fgadrms IOhannes signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Btw, any news on this old thread? I gave it a try but couldn't get it working right away - I need to get back to it but haven't had much time in the last couple of weeks. cheers Miller I can still try to build on my spare, don't hesitate to ask me if needed I made my test on

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

I gave it a try but couldn't get it working right away - I need to get back to it but haven't had much time in the last couple of weeks. cheers Miller On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 05:15:46PM +0100, Jo??o Pais wrote: > Any news about this? I would like to try it out, on both pc and mac. > > jmmmp >

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

I can still try to build on my spare, don't hesitate to ask me if needed I made my test on https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/commit/d8d637b6c53833c49c47c60ff78e3fbfd0d596c7 (currently 0.50-2 tag) Le mer. 29 janv. 2020 à 16:00, Miller Puckette via Pd-list < pd-list@lists.iem.at> a écrit : >

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Sure enough - I added binarymsg.c since my last Max-compile attempt, and yes, things like A_FLOAT will conflict with Max. I'll get in and patch that up at least. cheers Miller On Wed, Jan 29, 2020 at 10:43:07AM +0100, cyrille henry wrote: > most redefinition are a conflict between liboscia and

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

btw, you can still try it on your own thanks to some macos vagrant box. Le mer. 29 janv. 2020 à 11:23, Antoine Villeret a écrit : > > most redefinition are a conflict between liboscia and m_pd.h > > I don't think so, libossia appears in the log because this is where the > max-sdk is and that's

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

> most redefinition are a conflict between liboscia and m_pd.h I don't think so, libossia appears in the log because this is where the max-sdk is and that's all. If I move the max-sdk to another folder I got exactly the same redefinition errors. > But I don't know if m_ph.h should be included >

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

most redefinition are a conflict between liboscia and m_pd.h I would try to remove liboscia from your compilled path. But I don't know if m_ph.h should be included : it is removed for max from pd~ source thanks to a #define line 54 : #ifdef PD #include "m_pd.h" #include "s_stuff.h" static

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Hi, I just give a try without much success. There are lots of symbol redefinition errors. Here is the full output : https://gist.github.com/avilleret/19bfb74c84cc49b27bd8610545748044 I need some hint to go further with this. Cheers a Le mar. 28 janv. 2020 à 09:52, Alexandre Torres Porres a

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Em dom., 26 de jan. de 2020 às 08:58, Miller Puckette via Pd-list < pd-list@lists.iem.at> escreveu: > I was doing that for a while but stopped (it was a lot of trouble tracking > all > the changes in MacOS and Max at the time; perhaps this is easier now). I > won't be able to get to a Mac with

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Le 26/01/2020 à 17:56, Miller Puckette via Pd-list a écrit : I was doing that for a while but stopped (it was a lot of trouble tracking all the changes in MacOS and Max at the time; perhaps this is easier now). I won't be able to get to a Mac with Max until later this week, but if nobody else

Re: [PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

I was doing that for a while but stopped (it was a lot of trouble tracking all the changes in MacOS and Max at the time; perhaps this is easier now). I won't be able to get to a Mac with Max until later this week, but if nobody else can do it first I can give it a try. It's a fun object - you

[PD] pd~ binary for max/msp

Hello, Does anyone know where I can find the pd~ object compiled for max/MSP on OSX? I don't have any apple computer, nor max/MSP, but I have to work on a project that should run on this configuration. pd~ source code is made to be compiled for max, so I hope I can use it but can't find any