Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

Em dom., 7 de fev. de 2021 às 06:39, Dan Wilcox escreveu: > As an aside: Don't forget that the absence of a license does not make the > work explicitly "free for all", quite the opposite: > sure, I didn't mean to imply this meant anything could be done, I just suggested this could have been

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

As an aside: Don't forget that the absence of a license does not make the work explicitly "free for all", quite the opposite: https://choosealicense.com/no-permission/ The chances of the original authoring coming back and asking for a takedown etc

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

I'd love to see that ported to Windows pd. SDR is fun! I didn't know someone wrote an external for it. Kylee On Sat, Feb 6, 2021 at 6:03 PM Alexandre Torres Porres wrote: > > Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 22:23, bbob escreveu: > >> Alexandre >> >> pretty obscure, i'm sure, but I have a

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 22:23, bbob escreveu: > Alexandre > > pretty obscure, i'm sure, but I have a project using Tom Zicarelli's > 32bit pd-rtlsdr library (https://github.com/tkzic/pd-rtlsdr). I've > written to Tom a couple times to ask if he's ever thinking about updating > it... or if

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

the faintest clue about how to do that myself. b -- Forwarded message -- > From: Alexandre Torres Porres > To: Pd-List > Cc: > Bcc: > Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2021 11:38:32 -0300 > Subject: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why? > I was discussing this with

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

no problem, I still have pd 32b and just installed office 32b Am 06.02.2021 um 18:49 schrieb Alexandre Torres Porres: > in windows that's not a problem, it's common to have 64+32b software running So the newest system is 64 bits but can run 32 bits like macOS mojave and earlier, right? Just

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

> in windows that's not a problem, it's common to have 64+32b software running So the newest system is 64 bits but can run 32 bits like macOS mojave and earlier, right? Just wanna get it 100% straight. I guess that's the same with Linux, therefore the greatest concern is with macs indeed Em

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

So y'all can also answer me why you need 32 builds of windows/linux, if it has to do with externals only being available for 32 bits. Cause my main concern is to upgrade "relevant" libraries. But I mentioned macOS cause that's where I can really help most. We all know new

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 12:45, Alexandre Torres Porres < por...@gmail.com> escreveu: > > So y'all can also answer me why you need 32 builds of windows/linux, if it > has to do with externals only being available for 32 bits. Cause my main > concern is to upgrade "relevant" libraries. But I

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

rom: Alexandre Torres Porres mailto:por...@gmail.com>> > To: Jean-Marie Adrien <mailto:jm.adrien@gmail.com>> > Cc: Pd-List mailto:pd-list@lists.iem.at>> > Subject: Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why? > Message-ID: ><mailto:CAEAs

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

that's for windows, right? i was asking for macOS, but in fact I could and should expand the question to all systems! So y'all can also answer me why you need 32 builds of windows/linux, if it has to do with externals only being available for 32 bits. Cause my main concern is to upgrade

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

"my" external [leapmotion] still only exists for 32b, at some point I'll have to hire someone to upgrade the port if I do something with it on 64b - https://github.com/jmmmp/Pd_Leapmotion_win But that's surely not considered relevant, probably no one at all besides me uses it. Joao I was

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

Em sáb., 6 de fev. de 2021 às 11:53, Jean-Marie Adrien < jm.adrien@gmail.com> escreveu: > What about big sur ? I installed it just to test, I don't really use it, but I could install Pd and also get an old library like "unauthorized" from deken and it worked. I tested the "grid" GUI

Re: [PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

Hi Still using 32 bits pd, (and also 64 bits) : 32 bits are necessary not for PD itself, but for drivers of external hardware working with pd, because applications based on pd integrate many hardware pieces, some of them old, and obtaining a stabilized and cheap integrated hardware set is some

[PD] who still needs Pd 32 bits for macOS and why?

I was discussing this with Eric Lyon cause we're getting an official fftease 3.0 release out soon (heads up). It seems that people who need this are the ones who still use some externals that were only compiled for 32 bits. So I guess the question should be "which relevant externals are still