thanks for your tests and response!
these numbers look rather encouraging and at the same time let me
assume that something might be weird with my setup here.
after learning about 'hyperfine' from iohannes in the other thread, i
ran tests once more now with the new test release and get slightly
be
Well, I can't reproduce that here - I tried with 0.54-0, 0.55-0test2c.
and the latest build from CI:
time ~/Desktop/Pd-0.55-0test2c.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd -send "pd quit"
--> 0.03s user 0.08s system 13% cpu 0.854 total
time ~/Applications/Pd-0.54-1.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd -send "p
thanks a lot for pointing out 'hyperfine' and for providing this
somewhat self-defeating plugin.
comparing 0.54-1 to the artifact from the iem pipeline for 618b6325
now, i get the results below. side notes:
* the plugin is present in all cases, but should only affect the last
comparison, i assume
On 5/27/24 12:15, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
here's what i get on my Debian system using `hyperfine` (which runs the
application multiple times, to cater for disk-caching and whatnot)
| version | flags | time |
|-||-|
| 0.54-1 | | 1
On 5/27/24 09:24, Benjamin Wesch wrote:
replying to myself here after realizing that i made this quite
complicated, sorry.
it depends what you actually want to measure.
i get similar results when just doing this on
macos here:
time /Applications/Pd-0.54-1.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd -send
replying to myself here after realizing that i made this quite
complicated, sorry. i get similar results when just doing this on
macos here:
time /Applications/Pd-0.54-1.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd -send "pd quit"
vs.
time /Applications/Pd-0.55-0test2c.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd -send "pd qui
thanks for looking into this!
when comparing click-on-app-icon vs. starting
"/Applications/Pd-0.55-0test2c.app/Contents/Resources/bin/pd" from the
terminal, i also get slightly different results. the latter seems to
be a 1 or 2s faster (this was also the way i measured). the former
even causes the
I'm having trouble recreating this - I thik it was happening for a while
but now I can't seem to get consistent differences (after launching both
versions many times). Are you launching it by clicking on the Pd icon,
or some other way? (That seems to make a difference).
thanks
M
On 5/15/24
It feels slower to me too (on Mac at least) - not sure why but I'd like
to figure it out.
cheers
Miller
On 5/15/24 1:25 PM, Benjamin Wesch wrote:
hm, that's really weird. i tried to objectively measure here now with
a script that waits for the "connected" output when starting both
versions in
hm, that's really weird. i tried to objectively measure here now with
a script that waits for the "connected" output when starting both
versions in parallel and i consistently get results quite similar to
this:
pd-0.54-1.log: 0.99s
pd-0.55-0.log: 2.72s
so my subjective impression was certainly wr
Hmm... I'm not getting that on mine. The startup order is indeed
different -
the GUI doesn't start up until after any startup stuff has been done
(loading libraries,
etc). But I don't _think_ the overall time spent is different - do let
me know if you're
finding otherwise :)
Miller
On
thanks a lot for the test release!
what i noticed here (apple m2) in addition to the missing console
output: pd now takes ~5s to start. not a big deal obviously, but it's
a huge difference compared to 0.54, where the gui is ready after ~1s.
cheers,
ben
Am Di., 14. Mai 2024 um 16:26 Uhr schrieb Mi
Em ter., 14 de mai. de 2024 às 15:19, Christof Ressi
escreveu:
> It used to be XP, but since Pd 0.54 it's Vista because of the new WASAPI
> backend. The 32-bit version, however, still runs on XP because it is built
> without WASAPI.
>
Awesome, Miller, I think it seems worth mentioning "Windows V
It used to be XP, but since Pd 0.54 it's Vista because of the new WASAPI
backend. The 32-bit version, however, still runs on XP because it is
built without WASAPI.
On 14.05.2024 20:13, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
What is the minimal Windows OS version you can install Pd (the 64 bit
one)? Ev
What is the minimal Windows OS version you can install Pd (the 64 bit one)?
Every other option seems to mention the minimum OS, but this one is missing.
cheers
Em ter., 14 de mai. de 2024 às 11:26, Miller Puckette <
mpucke...@cloud.ucsd.edu> escreveu:
> To Pd-announce:
>
> Pd version 0.55-0 test
* Christof Ressi [2024-05-14 18:40]:
> > I wonder what the updates to the audio interfacing and scheduler are?
>
> See https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1756.
Thanks, amazing!
best, P
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and ac
Em ter., 14 de mai. de 2024 às 12:17, Edwin van der Heide
escreveu:
> The PD Window doesn’t display the text from the external libraries that
> are loaded at startup anymore. The libraries are still visible in
> Preferences > Startup and work as usual.
I can confirm it doesn't load the texts, b
I wonder what the updates to the audio interfacing and scheduler are?
See https://github.com/pure-data/pure-data/pull/1756.
Christof
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-l
* Miller Puckette [2024-05-14 16:24]:
> To Pd-announce:
>
> Pd version 0.55-0 test2 is available from http://msp.ucsd.edu/software.htm
Thanks Miller,
just reading the changelog at
https://msp.ucsd.edu/Pd_documentation/x5.htm#s5.1
I wonder what the updates to the audio interfacing and scheduler
One observation:
The PD Window doesn’t display the text from the external libraries that are
loaded at startup anymore.
The libraries are still visible in Preferences > Startup and work as usual.
Best!
Edwin
> On 14 May 2024, at 16:23, Miller Puckette wrote:
>
> To Pd-announce:
>
> Pd vers
20 matches
Mail list logo
