fmod() is a c function with a consistent definition:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/numeric/math/fmod
If I remember correctly, the % operator result can take the sign of its
dividend, but it does not have to; it is implementation specific. Likewise
integer division using / is implementation speci
HAH, % in SuperCollider will work as [mod] in Pd
-7 % 5 gives us -3
2016-05-08 1:09 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres :
> cool, yeah, i fugured there was a reason for mod to be coded the way it is
>
> but I'm more concerned on how "%" could be unreliable... or even "fmod"?
>
> cheers
>
> 2016-0
cool, yeah, i fugured there was a reason for mod to be coded the way it is
but I'm more concerned on how "%" could be unreliable... or even "fmod"?
cheers
2016-05-08 1:01 GMT-03:00 Jonathan Wilkes :
>
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.general/56291/match=div+mod
>
>
> On
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.multimedia.puredata.general/56291/match=div+mod
On Saturday, May 7, 2016 11:45 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres
wrote:
On Sat, May 7, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Miller Puckette wrote:
I _think_ (but am not sure) that "%" works differently on different
CPU archit
