2017-10-17 21:08 GMT-02:00 Jonathan Wilkes :
>
> It's possible you saw the pattern in an abstraction library where this
> issue doesn't come up.
>
but I didn't. And it's also a pattern outside Pd (like in Max, for instance)
Your preference complicates the source code for no significant usability
>> why do you think you are missing something?
> I usually do that, cause I'm not a programmer
[...]
> I also see this pattern here and there, so I'm
> not coming up with this, would anyone have something
> against using "."?
You said above you are not a programmer above, so I'll
thrown i
well, yes :-)
i’m used to files that end with a suffix .whatever
the .whatever usually designates the filetype. so using a . before the filetype
suffix is much harder to read for me and totally uncommon.
while this is not an issue within pd itself it is still worth considering i
think.
> On 17
2017-10-17 17:45 GMT-02:00 Jonathan Wilkes :
> > Well, here's what I have, an object named [allpass.rev~]
>
> As a practical matter, I still don't understand why you are trying
> to use "." instead of "_".
>
not trying anymore, I succeeded, so it seems.
and I already said it's just a matter of p
> Well, here's what I have, an object named [allpass.rev~]
As a practical matter, I still don't understand why you are trying
to use "." instead of "_".
-Jonathan
___
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.
well, just tested in windows and linux and it worked :)
2017-10-17 17:23 GMT-02:00 IOhannes m zmölnig :
>
> why should it not work?
>
I dunno, that's why I asked, it wasn't clear it'd be fine without hexloader
> why do you think you are missing something?
>
I usually do that, cause I'm not a
On 10/17/2017 08:59 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> Well, here's what I have, an object named [allpass.rev~]
>
> I compiled a file name "allpass.rev~.pd_darwin", I have
> a allpass.rev~-help.pd, all works fine here in the mac, and all I had to do
> was having a setup_allpass0x2erev_tilde()
Well, here's what I have, an object named [allpass.rev~]
I compiled a file name "allpass.rev~.pd_darwin", I have
a allpass.rev~-help.pd, all works fine here in the mac, and all I had to do
was having a setup_allpass0x2erev_tilde() function in the code.
Now, what am I missing? Is this not gonna
On 10/17/2017 07:44 PM, Jonathan Wilkes via Pd-list wrote:
>
>> and how come underline works just fine?
> Because Pd's loader mechanism searches for the symbol "${libname}_setup",
> where "${libname}" is the name of the library being loaded.
> If you make sure that "${libname}" is drawn from the
> and how come underline works just fine?
Because Pd's loader mechanism searches for the symbol "${libname}_setup",
where "${libname}" is the name of the library being loaded.
If you make sure that "${libname}" is drawn from the set of characters thatcan
appear in a C function name, then users
and how come underline works just fine? What other easy options do I have
besides "_"?
2017-10-17 14:39 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres :
> Hi, hiow much of a nightmare is it to compile an object with "." in its
> name?
>
> something like "allpass.rev~"
>
> do I need hexloader, do I need to cre
11 matches
Mail list logo
