Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

On 2016-11-05 11:52, Matthew Walster wrote: I know some people are working on YANG modeling for peering interactions on the layer-8 level, I can see a the pinder approach as viable too. I do not know where these things belong yet and what PeeringDB's role in it will be. For now I

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 10:52:25AM +, Matthew Walster wrote: > On 5 November 2016 at 10:42, Job Snijders wrote: > > I recommend you remove the 'cheap gimmick' parts and make it look more > > like a boring business tool with appropiate domain name and > > documentation style. That will help bri

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

On 5 November 2016 at 10:42, Job Snijders wrote: > > > ​Awww, I like a good hat.​ > I recommend you remove the 'cheap gimmick' parts and make it look more > like a boring business tool with appropiate domain name and > documentation style. That will help bring the actual novel and > intriguing

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

Hi Matthew, I recommend you remove the 'cheap gimmick' parts and make it look more like a boring business tool with appropiate domain name and documentation style. That will help bring the actual novel and intriguing parts of the engine into focal point. I know some people are working on YANG m

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

On 5 November 2016 at 03:54, Rawdon, Ryan wrote: > +1 for turning this into something running on/inside of PDB, since it is > already the hub of peering matchmaking today… just without the actual > matchmaking (well, Peering Coordinator Communication State Machine). > ​To be 100% clear on my int

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

02, 2016 22:13 To: Matt Griswold Cc: pdb-tech@lists.peeringdb.com Subject: Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder Excellent, most appreciated! [Image removed by sender.] Matthew Walster | Network Engineer fastly.com<http://fastly.com/> | @fastly<https://twitter.c

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

On 3 November 2016 at 03:45, Matt Griswold wrote: > * Charles Gucker [161102 23:32 -0400]: > > Hate to top post here as well, but wouldn't this just be a WebUI for > > Peering Manager? > > > > https://github.com/inex/IXP-Manager/wiki/Peering-Manager > Nope, that requires the IX run IXP-Manager.

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

* Charles Gucker [161102 23:32 -0400]: > Hate to top post here as well, but wouldn't this just be a WebUI for > Peering Manager? > > https://github.com/inex/IXP-Manager/wiki/Peering-Manager Nope, that requires the IX run IXP-Manager. ___ Pdb-tech mailin

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

Hate to top post here as well, but wouldn't this just be a WebUI for Peering Manager? https://github.com/inex/IXP-Manager/wiki/Peering-Manager Charles On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Matthew Walster wrote: > Hey all, > > The weekend before RIPE73, RIPE NCC held an IXP Tools Hackathon, and an

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

Excellent, most appreciated! *Matthew Walster *| Network Engineer fastly.com | @fastly | LinkedIn On 3 November 2016 at 03:08, Matt Griswold wrote: > Top posting since I just skimmed it (but had already looked at your > slide

Re: [PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

Top posting since I just skimmed it (but had already looked at your slide deck from the RIPE emails) and am not addressing specific points... yet :) Nice work - I think it's a good idea and would belong in PeeringDB. I've brought it up internally for board discussion and we will update the list af

[PDB Tech] RIPE NCC IXP Tools Hackathon: Pinder

Hey all, The weekend before RIPE73, RIPE NCC held an IXP Tools Hackathon, and an idea we came up with was a system to facilitate peering. It's not a matchmaking service -- you don't get suggested possible peers, you don't submit any sensitive data -- it just facilitates peering. I'm sure you've