Surgery on build.xml would be less work than a complete rewrite in a .Net
language. Even a separate build.xml file for Mono ...
On 8/5/08, Kenneth D Weinert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> I understand that - but it explicitly will only build i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I understand that - but it explicitly will only build if the platform
is Windows.
Thus my question as some of the variables would have to be set
conditionally as ikvmc is not in the same place on Windows and the
Mono install. The build.xml makes the a
There is a .Net version -- via IKVM. Take a good look at the ant script and
you'll see an option for building the .Net version. There's some
documentation around ... don't have a URL at hand, though.
Daniel
On 8/5/08, Kenneth D Weinert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Has any thought been given (and would it be possible) to build a .NET
version using Mono on Linux?
I'll be glad to give this a go if it seems possible, but it'll take
some skill updating on my part since I've not worked with ant and jave
for about 5 o
The outline is ok. As an alternative ..incubator/pdfbox could be moved
to ..incubator/pdfbox/main if we don't merge all three.
As noted some time ago, XML Graphics Commons (XGC) has an XMP facility
that's more or less equivalent to JempBox, but it's not yet available as
a separate JAR (with only X
Hi,
Just a quick outline of the SVN structure I came up with:
* The main PDFBox codebase has its trunk,tags,branches structure right
below https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/pdfbox.
* The FontBox codebase has a separate trunk,tags,branches structure
below https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I know I've done work with PDF-Box in the past and I've suggested
changes and perhaps contributed a small bit code.
For whatever it's worth I can and will release any code or other
contributions, if any, so as to indemnify the Apache Software
Foundati
On 05.08.2008 16:06:34 Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Makes sense. How far did the ICLA collection effort go already? Just the
> > main committers or also the authors of any non-trivial contribution in
> > the past? I t
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Makes sense. How far did the ICLA collection effort go already? Just the
> main committers or also the authors of any non-trivial contribution in
> the past? I think that's a prerequisite to a first release, isn't it?
>>I would do the package rename as soon as possible.
Yes, the sooner the pain is over, the better, IMO.
Daniel
On 8/5/08, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thanks a lot for handling the source import and related tasks, Jukka!
> I'll look after the website later this week.
>
>
> On 0
Thanks a lot for handling the source import and related tasks, Jukka!
I'll look after the website later this week.
On 05.08.2008 14:19:30 Jukka Zitting wrote:
> Hi,
>
> With all the source code in svn, we can start thinking about making a
> new release. There are already a number of post-0.7.3 fi
hi jukka,
many thanks for importing all the pdfbox sources into the apache svn,
updating the jira stuff and setting up a ci build!
regards,
philipp
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't think I yet have a Jira account. I got the new committer info from
you ... and that talks about creating a Jira account. I'll try it later &
see what happens ...
Daniel
On 8/5/08, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Wilson
> <[EM
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Daniel Wilson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If those are recent changes, they may be my fault.
>
> If there's a way to handle those that JDK 1.4 will do, I'm all for it. I
> could try making those changes, but probably not before Saturday.
Cool, thanks! This sh
Latest trunk uses Java 5 autoboxing
---
Key: PDFBOX-364
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PDFBOX-364
Project: PDFBox
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Jukka Zitting
Priority: Minor
T
If those are recent changes, they may be my fault.
If there's a way to handle those that JDK 1.4 will do, I'm all for it. I
could try making those changes, but probably not before Saturday.
Daniel Wilson
On 8/5/08, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When setting up the Hudson
Hi,
When setting up the Hudson build I noticed that the current PDFBox
trunk doesn't build with JDK 1.4 due to a number of autoboxed (mostly
boolean) method arguments. Is this intentional?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some more project infrastructure: I'd like to setup CI builds of
> PDFBox using Hudson (see [1]).
I've now created a Hudson CI build for PDFBox trunk. You can find it
at http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/PDFB
Hi,
With all the source code in svn, we can start thinking about making a
new release. There are already a number of post-0.7.3 fixes and
improvements in the codebase, so I would target for a release as soon
as we've reviewed the release contents in relation to Apache policies.
I've tentatively a
Hi,
I've now updated the PDFBox sources in Apache svn to match the latest
developments in SourceForge cvs. Also, as you probably noticed from
the commit messages, I updated the svn:eol-style settings on the
included text files. The trunk should now be ready for use!
To checkout the PDFBox sources
Hi,
Can we setup the SourceForge issue trackers to notify
pdfbox-dev@incubator.apache.org whenever new issues or comments are
posted?
The PDFBOX Jira should now be up to date with all the latest stuff
from SourceForge, and I'd like to make sure that we don't miss any new
traffic from there.
BR,
21 matches
Mail list logo
