Seems like a good idea. I seem to remember there was a problem with
CPAN deleting the distributions.
If that is still the case, maybe we can get some help from the CPAN admins.
I plan to leave PDL-2.006 for a while since it is the first release
using the 2.x numbering standard and
the change of
Hi,
As PDL 2.008 is coming up for release, it would be a good idea to delete
all the old versions of PDL from PAUSE. This way users will not be
confused by decade-old versions.
Additionally, `cpanm --dev PDL` will work properly and install the
latest dev release of PDL.
Thankfully, Perl users ca
This CPAN developers release should be appearing at a CPAN mirror near
you soon.
This is likely the last check release before code freeze for final
PDL-2.008 prep.
Please test and report any issues.
Thanks,
Chris and the PDL Development team
> Release Notes for PDL 2.007_13 --
On 2015-03-22 at 01:32:11 -, Ed wrote:
> The Travis build of current master is going very slowly, but has all green
> lights so far, including the key "dev EUMM" one.
>
> Bad news: it's failing badly on my Win32 setup, with lots of crashing
> through the test suite largely on calls to "maximum
On 2015-03-21 at 16:57:33 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote:
> On 2015-03-21 at 12:31:44 -0400, Chris Marshall wrote:
> > All-
> >
> > It looks like some final fixes are still in the works for PDL-2.008.
> > In the interest of marking progress, I plan to make a CPAN
> > developers release this afterno
On 2015-03-18 at 18:07:27 -0500, Zakariyya Mughal wrote:
> On 2015-03-18 at 15:25:05 -0600, Derek Lamb wrote:
> > I just created a branch clang_warnings that is focused on squashing
> > the sometimes nit-picky warnings clang generates when PDL is compiled.
> > In fact, probably >90% of the warnings
