Re: [Pdl-devel] 20th Anniversary OMG

2016-06-09 Thread Karl Glazebrook
Yes! I have the source (ascii text + figures) of the TPJ article. (There are a few words different but it is basically the same). It would take a little bit of work to make it in to a nice web page article (a few hours), is anyone interested? Interesting to see all the functions in PDL1.11 coul

Re: [Pdl-devel] 20th Anniversary OMG

2016-06-09 Thread Derek Lamb
Karl, Do you happen to have laying around anywhere a copy of the original perlDL article? The Perl Journal stopped publication ~10 years ago and Dr. Dobb's Journal website has been hosting the articles. However the Dr. Dobb's Journal website ceased updates at the end of 2014. So it might be

Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-general] 20th Anniversary OMG

2016-06-09 Thread Karl Glazebrook
> On 8 Jun 2016, at 9:42 AM, Karl Glazebrook wrote: > > > Do we want to mark this in anyway? Maybe release a ‘final' version of PDL 2? > (which should be v.2.71828182845905 following Knuth...) Or given that PDL v2 is now moving in to a very stable/bug fix mode how about one version a year?

Re: [Pdl-devel] SciPDL 3 for Mac OS X

2016-06-09 Thread Karl Glazebrook
Chris. You wish is my command: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/2148080/SciPDL-v2.016.dmg Perhaps delete the other versions to avoid confusion? Karl > On 6 Jun 2016, at 8:21 AM, Karl Glazebrook wrote: > > Yes, I think I am persuaded. Just giving the history > > Karl > > >> On 6 Jun 2

Re: [Pdl-devel] OS X issue

2016-06-09 Thread Karl Glazebrook
Thanks David. I took a look and it seems that adding LD=‘cc’ to the perl Makefile.PL line is enough to make this go away. This is fine for SciPDL - since it is a perl OS X config issue I won’t propose a PDL patch. Karl > On 6 Jun 2016, at 12:17 AM, David Mertens wrote: > > Here is more rel