On 2016-06-14 at 02:25:13 +, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> I would say ‘too little too late’
>
> Since we are already developing on github (many of whose nice features are
> reminiscent of the old SF) I say cut the cord!
What will we do with the mailing list, website, issue tracker, and wiki?
Fo
Thanks, David!
I just merged it in.
> On Jun 13, 2016, at 7:19 PM, David Mertens wrote:
>
> Hey Craig,
>
> This is great. It passes the tests that illustrated the problem, and the
> C-level data copy code looks correct, afaict. I'd say this is probably good
> for a merge, since it doesn't t
I would say ‘too little too late’
Since we are already developing on github (many of whose nice features are
reminiscent of the old SF) I say cut the cord!
Karl
> On 13 Jun 2016, at 1:46 PM, Derek Lamb wrote:
>
> Apparently there's been an acquisition, some soul searching, and maybe SF is
>
Hey Craig,
This is great. It passes the tests that illustrated the problem, and the
C-level data copy code looks correct, afaict. I'd say this is probably good
for a merge, since it doesn't touch too much.
David
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Craig DeForest
wrote:
>
> Hearing crickets, I we
The docs for PDL::PP talk about two modifiers in the Pars section:
[o] designates an output piddle
[t] designates a temporary piddle
In the PDL source tree I also see
[nc]
[oca]
[phys]
I could trudge through the source to figure it out I suppose, but maybe
somebody could just explain those thr
Hearing crickets, I went ahead and implemented the hybrid scheme, in the
“badval-constructor” branch. I’m waiting for David to give it a spin, then
I’ll merge into master.
> On Jun 12, 2016, at 7:56 PM, Craig DeForest wrote:
>
> So David’s recent “ping” on the long-standing desire to propag
