interpol() seems to be implemented in terms of
interpolate() already. Does seem a bit confusing.
Maybe the two routines could be merged into a
"smarter" interpolate()...
--Chris
On 10/15/2016 05:18, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> Seems to me we should fix this inconsistency in usage?
>
> - Karl
>
> us
In about a week. right now I don’t want to risk breaking my install as I am in
the middle of using PDL to do critical stuff, which is also keeping me busy..
> On 16 Oct 2016, at 6:17 AM, Chris Marshall wrote:
>
> Hi Karl-
>
> PDL-2.017 is testing very well (and cleanly with all the warning fi
Hi Karl-
PDL-2.017 is testing very well (and cleanly with all the warning fixed
by Derek!).
Do you have an estimate time of a SciPDL-2.017 release?
Cheers,
Chris
On 9/29/2016 18:23, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> Maybe a few days AFTER that! I will be in the middle of classes on Oct 10,
> otherwise
Seems to me we should fix this inconsistency in usage?
- Karl
use PDL;
$x = sequence(100);
$y = $x**2;
$x2 = sequence(10)*10;
# This works
$y2 = interpol $x2, $x, $y;
print $y2, "\n";
# This does not work
$y2 = interpolate $x2, $x, $y;
print $y2, "\n";
# But this does
($y2,$err) = interpolate
