On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:27 PM Diab Jerius wrote:
> My philosophy is that the only things that should be methods are those
> that require knowledge of the private innards of a piddle, or that are
> required for implementing overloaded operators (useful for subclassing
> PDL. I had to write overl
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 1:24 PM Ed . wrote:
>
> Hi Diab,
>
> Thanks for a very quick reply. I would note that you sent this to me, and at
> least I think your thoughts deserve a wider audience so you might also
> forward to pdl-devel :-) If so, I'll be pleased to reply there as I believe
> this di
-- Forwarded message -
From: Diab Jerius
Date: Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL release; I'm volunteering.
To: Ed .
Ed,
Thanks for your reply
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 11:37 AM Ed . wrote:
>
> Hi Diab,
>
> It seems you got the same level of response
Hi Diab,
It seems you got the same level of response I got a month or two ago, having
made the same offer, including from you ;-)
The elephant in the room, as I may have said several dozen times over the
last number of years, is that CHM is very busy. Until he wants to release
stuff, or actual
I think I've officially been Warnocked.
I've been working my way through a number of areas (graphics, ppcode,
module layout, documentation, etc), but haven't finalized a proposal
for what I would hope to accomplish as the next release manager.
If that's what's holding up any response to my offer,
