Converting between PDL::Complex and native is still on the to-do list. What
your expression created there is a PDL::Complex (which is a thin layer over a
PDL with an extra dim of 2) whose underlying numbers were native complex
numbers, hence your output. That would be straightforward enough to d
Trying to find out how safe is it to mix different types of complex
numbers (for migration purposes), I tried:
pdl> use PDL::Complex
pdl> print i*ci()
0+0i +0+1ii
So, I guess not surprisingly, that they are not. I don't know if these
mixed operations should be forbidden (I guess it wo
