Re: [Pdl-devel] Advent Calendar Success

2024-12-27 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
Likewise thank you from me for the opportunity to participate! It is a nice set of neat articles best Karl > On 26 Dec 2024, at 10:15 AM, Christos P Argyropoulos > wrote: > > Boyd and Ed > Thank you for the opportunity to contribute. Merry Christmas ! > > Christos > > Christos Argyropoul

Re: [Pdl-devel] [Pdl-general] PDL disappeared from CPAN?

2024-12-07 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
Is there a full list of the modules to be split off? Karl > On 4 Dec 2024, at 9:16 AM, Ed . wrote: > > Hi all, > > This is due to a known problem in MetaCPAN the website (not CPAN as a whole). > It's triggered here by me releasing modules as independent distributions that > are currently pa

Re: [Pdl-devel] Mac test please?

2024-04-12 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
rays and manipulate them. > > Running pdl [home].app generates the warnings noted in the readme. Re-saving > the file as suggested works around them, after which I need to allow it to > access the relevant directories. > > > Regards, > Shawn. > > > >

Re: [Pdl-devel] Mac test please?

2024-04-10 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
on a GitHub release, can you > make sure it’s on an accurate tag? There was a “v2.025” added to (I think) > 2.085. I didn’t know what it was. Please only use tags that exist on there > already, and let me add any tags needed (there won’t be any new ones needed). > > Be

[Pdl-devel] Mac test please?

2024-04-10 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
Hi there, Can a Mac user test this version of SciPDL? I’d very much appreciate it. (Monterey or later) https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/moao3dr43wxa7o1cs6cam/SciPDL-v2.084-Test.dmg?rlkey=1xcfi258mb3r88m2h0gq2x43f&dl=0

Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-10-28 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
Thanks Ed - I will experiment with -O3. Indeed it would be good to make the basic ops as optimised as possible Karl > On 27 Oct 2021, at 3:08 am, Ed . wrote: > > If you’re using a typical consumer computer, you’ll get limitations of memory > bandwidth, which it seems will limit simple calcul

Re: [Pdl-devel] benchmarks

2021-10-26 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
This thread is interesting. I was wondering if anyone has ever seen speedups of 2x or better with PDL_AUTOPTHREAD_TARG > 2? I find it tends to max out at around 1.5-1.7x whatever I set. I know about overhead etc. but kind of feel for some of the basic stuff (e.g. A=B*C for large arrays with bi

Re: [Pdl-devel] PDL maintainer/co-maintainer

2019-07-27 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
Thanks Chris for all your service! Best of wishes for the reign of Ed and Diab! Karl > On 28 Jul 2019, at 6:09 am, Chris Marshall wrote: > > I've given EDJ primary permissions for my PDL and ExtUtils::F77 stuff. > I've added DJERIUS as co-maintainer for the same. > I still have co-maintainer

Re: [Pdl-devel] Whither PDL?

2019-04-12 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
Thanks Ed for restarting this conversation. Your fix-lite patch seems good to me. > Do people still use PDL? - Yes I do, I have a number of scripts and stuff for my research. These days I do also use python (about half my coding probably) as my collaborators and students all mostly use it (it

Re: [Pdl-devel] problems with PDL on ActivePerl

2018-11-30 Thread Karl Glazebrook via pdl-devel
I found the easiest way was to turn on the ‘Windows Subsystem for Linux’ - install Ubuntu from the Windows Store (noting this is not a VM) and then do ‘apt install pdl’ from the bash shell. Karl > On 30 Nov 2018, at 5:30 pm, Derek Lamb wrote: > > After updating the install webpage for SciPDL