Yes, it does need to be a build require. RC4 is ready from my perspective!
From: Chris Marshall
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2015 9:25 PM
To: Ed
Cc: pdl-devel
Subject: Re: [Pdl-devel] build problems PDL-2.008 RC3
Hi Ed-
Are we good for an RC4 release?
Regarding File::Path, I think it needs to be
hris Marshall
> Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 2:44 PM
> To: pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Pdl-devel] build problems PDL-2.008 RC3
>
>
> I've just reviewed the CPAN Testers reports for
> CHM/PDL-2.007_16.tar.gz (a.k.a. PDL-2.008 RC3):
>
> PDL 2.007_16
ng SF#378 until after 2.008.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Marshall
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 2:44 PM
To: pdl-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Pdl-devel] build problems PDL-2.008 RC3
I've just reviewed the CPAN Testers reports for
CHM/PDL-2.007_16.tar.gz (a.k.a. PDL
I've just reviewed the CPAN Testers reports for
CHM/PDL-2.007_16.tar.gz (a.k.a. PDL-2.008 RC3):
PDL 2.007_16 (129 ALL, 5 FAILs, 6 NAs, 99 PASSes, 19 UNKNOWNs)
These are considerably worse than the stats for
PDL-2.007 where all non-PASS come in at less than
3%. Digging in the testers output by
