Right now, interpol() is a perl wrapper calls the pp routine interpolate() and
barfs if it returns an error status. (both at the pp level)
One could change interpolate() to do different things in a wantarray/scalar
context...
- but I do not think that is possible at the pp-level? It seems ine
We have explicitly removed all wantarray behavior from Mojolicious. In a
web context it basically will always be a security vulnerability waiting
for an unsuspecting application author. In PDL it is more likely to be a
bug in waiting than a vuln but you never know.
On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:20 AM
Also, this works (append to end of Karl's example):
($y2) = interpolate $x2, $x, $y;
These two routines differ in the context they expect to return to, and
interpolate's behavior is a known Perl wart. Stever Haryanto gave a nice
discussion of this Perl wart:
http://blogs.perl.or
interpol() seems to be implemented in terms of
interpolate() already. Does seem a bit confusing.
Maybe the two routines could be merged into a
"smarter" interpolate()...
--Chris
On 10/15/2016 05:18, Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> Seems to me we should fix this inconsistency in usage?
>
> - Karl
>
> us
Seems to me we should fix this inconsistency in usage?
- Karl
use PDL;
$x = sequence(100);
$y = $x**2;
$x2 = sequence(10)*10;
# This works
$y2 = interpol $x2, $x, $y;
print $y2, "\n";
# This does not work
$y2 = interpolate $x2, $x, $y;
print $y2, "\n";
# But this does
($y2,$err) = interpolate
