nt: 17 January 2024 14:29
To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com>
Cc: Karl Glazebrook<mailto:karlglazebr...@mac.com>;
perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] Changes I noted PDL2.025 -> PDL2.084 - scalars vs
piddles
Hi Ed
I am not sure what
To: Ed .<mailto:ej...@hotmail.com>
Cc: perldl<mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Pdl-general] Changes I noted PDL2.025 -> PDL2.084 - scalars vs
piddles
Hi Ed
I believe the original logic here (likely mine) was that if the 0D PDLs turned
automatically in to scalars they
Ed
>
> From: Karl Glazebrook via pdl-general
> <mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Sent: 07 January 2024 00:29
> To: perldl <mailto:pdl-general@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Subject: [Pdl-general] Changes I noted PDL2.025 -> PDL2.084 - scalars vs
> piddles
>
[Pdl-general] Changes I noted PDL2.025 -> PDL2.084 - scalars vs piddles
Hi all,
This dinosaur just upgraded from PDL v2.025 to v.2.084 (yes, I know that is
lame)
I noticed a few things when running one of my complicated codes, I will start
seperate email threads
Next I think this one is a desig
Hi all,
This dinosaur just upgraded from PDL v2.025 to v.2.084 (yes, I know that is
lame)
I noticed a few things when running one of my complicated codes, I will start
seperate email threads
Next I think this one is a design choice change I missed.
- Functions like median() max() etc now
