Would anyone happen to be lucky enough to posess or even have the
chance to test out the legendary FA*250-600/5.6 Mega Zoom from Pentax?
I'm seriously considering obtaining one I've located, but the jury is
still out on whether it will perform on digital in the same leaque as
its little cous
In a message dated 2/27/2007 6:36:55 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's Creek. The
picture was taken from (guessing) 175 feet above the surface.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5654453
Tom C.
===
On 3/1/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick Womer"
> Subject: Re: March PUG IS UP
>
>
> > What a great gallery!
> >
> > One of the things I love about the PUG is that most of
> > the photos are from people who never post on the PDML.
> > It woul
Happy Birthday 500 mm f4 Luxury Image Stabilized cake ;-).
Boris
Christian wrote:
> Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
> payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
> it, I bought myself a major gift:
>
> OT because it does not h
- Original Message -
From: "Rick Womer"
Subject: Re: March PUG IS UP
> What a great gallery!
>
> One of the things I love about the PUG is that most of
> the photos are from people who never post on the PDML.
> It would be fun to hear from them here.
>
It's the not posting here that
On Feb 28, 2007, at 8:19 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> Of course, with the MacBook she has that annoying glossy screen so
> she'll probably have to be cleaning it about once every other day.
> Does anyone know WHY so many machines come with those annoying glossy
> screens these days
They're
Charles Robinson wrote:
> On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:30, Stan Halpin wrote:
>
>> I moisten a paper towel and gently wipe the screen surface on my Mac
>> notebooks. The grease from your fingers transfers to the keyboard
>> and, when the lid is closed, to the screen. An occasional wipedown of
>> the key
On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:22, Walter Hamler wrote:
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeBWweb.jpg
>
> http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/
> GirraffeFeedingweb.jpg
>
> My Giraffee shot, one in B&W, one in Color.
>
Color. Can't say why other than that the B&W look
Excellent series. It's the sort of stark nature abstract that really
appeals to me.
The second is probably the strongest.
-Adam
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> The theme of my PAW 08 photograph continued to bump around in my
> head. The abstraction has to me something of the feel of etchings or
On Feb 28, 2007, at 20:30, Stan Halpin wrote:
> I moisten a paper towel and gently wipe the screen surface on my Mac
> notebooks. The grease from your fingers transfers to the keyboard
> and, when the lid is closed, to the screen. An occasional wipedown of
> the keyboard can prolong the intervals
Silent Deadly Microwave
On Feb 28, 2007, at 6:53 PM, John Celio wrote:
> From: "John Whittingham"
>> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:09:23 +, Eric Featherstone wrote
>>> On 28/02/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 28/2/07, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
> But there's no me
At 11:09 AM 1/03/2007, David J Brooks wrote:
>My sister has the macbook, and has asked me what i use to clean my
>screen. Since i don'y smoke and keep it away from the wood stove, i
>have not had to clean the screen.
>
>Any words of advice to pass on to sis.
Steel wool pot scrubber. Works a treat
On Feb 28, 2007, at 6:09 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> My sister has the macbook, and has asked me what i use to clean my
> screen. Since i don'y smoke and keep it away from the wood stove, i
> have not had to clean the screen.
>
> Any words of advice to pass on to sis.
A microfiber cloth and, if
A Gestalt moment...
(the whole is greater than the sum of its parts)
The head looks disembodied...over all the color version somehow makes
better "sense" of the context (apart from the title). The quality of
the b&w is superb but it took me a nanosecond longer to get a sense of
what is going on..
I moisten a paper towel and gently wipe the screen surface on my Mac
notebooks. The grease from your fingers transfers to the keyboard
and, when the lid is closed, to the screen. An occasional wipedown of
the keyboard can prolong the intervals between screen cleanings.
stan
On Feb 28, 2007,
I am betting that 15 May will be the actual release date. I think
they are following the same strategy as with the K10D - delaying from
the original release date as they realize the high demand they will
face. As with the K10D, I think the prices are about $500 under
anybody's most optimist
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeBWweb.jpg
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v699/newtmaker/GirraffeFeedingweb.jpg
My Giraffee shot, one in B&W, one in Color.
Comments appreciated.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm
My sister has the macbook, and has asked me what i use to clean my
screen. Since i don'y smoke and keep it away from the wood stove, i
have not had to clean the screen.
Any words of advice to pass on to sis.
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com
Nice Work. Winter trees comes off well especially in B+W.
Coincidently, I did my 2007 calendar using trees I've captured around the
states.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: GESO: 2007 - Winter, Trees - GDG
> The theme of my PAW
What a great gallery!
One of the things I love about the PUG is that most of
the photos are from people who never post on the PDML.
It would be fun to hear from them here.
Rick
--- Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I had to go to the Previous Galleries and all of
> 2007 is listed. Whe
Certainly does, now you're dependent on the longevity, and good will of
a corporation to protect your private data. Not to mention network
security. Outages that may keep you from deadlines. Loss of personal
control,. Yep seems like a good idea to me.
Juan Buhler wrote:
> On 2/28/07, Tom C <[E
It looks like it will be a fairly dumbed-down (low-end) version of
Photoshop, which I doubt would be worthwhile to anyone serious about photo
editing.
Tom C.
>From: "Juan Buhler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
>Subject: Re: Photoshop
John Whittingham wrote:
> No, don't do it, not C***n, the darkside, get a good used pair of *ist D's 8)
Much as I'd love to, they just don't have the resolution I need...
S
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 2/28/07, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wasn't responding to you because I was totally bewildered. :-)
>
> I can see people liking it that could not/might not otherwise purchase it.
> But I think it would be quite slow compared to a local copy of the software.
It doesn't have to be slow,
Original Message
Subject: PESO - Da Bear
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:30:51 -0700
From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Taken in Denali National Park, Alaska during a fall snowstorm wi
From: "John Whittingham"
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:09:23 +, Eric Featherstone wrote
>> On 28/02/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On 28/2/07, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>> >
>> > >But there's no mentioneing of what SDM stands for.
>> >
>> > Should Do More.
>>
>> Sa Do Masoc
Original Message
Subject: Re: Probably old news already
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:19:44 -0700
From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.adorama.com/PX1650AFD.html $750
> http://www.adorama.com/PX50135AFD.html $830
>
> Some of you may really lik
Original Message
Subject: Re: Probably old news already
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 16:18:49 -0700
From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.adorama.com/PX1650AFD.html $750
http://www.adorama.com/PX50135AFD.html $830
Some of you may really like this.
Damn spell checker.
Tom C wrote:
> I wasn't responding to you because I was totally bewildered. :-)
>
> I can see people liking it that could not/might not otherwise purchase it.
> But I think it would be quite slow compared to a local copy of the software.
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
> From: "P. J. All
At 07:32 AM 1/03/2007, Cotty wrote:
>On 28/2/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
> >payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
> >it, I bought myself a major gift:
> >
> >OT because it doe
I wasn't responding to you because I was totally bewildered. :-)
I can see people liking it that could not/might not otherwise purchase it.
But I think it would be quite slow compared to a local copy of the software.
Tom C.
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss
John,
>>I own just the M200/4 and the A70-210/4 and generally I concur with
>>your findings. Nevertheless my sample of M200/4 shows some chromatic
>>aberration on film (haven't tried it on digital yet).
>
> Never really noticed CA in any of my shots but the K 300mm f/4 has a little,
> expecte
On Feb 28, 2007, at 4:18 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
>> http://www.gdgphoto.com/wintertree/
>
> That autoviewer is an abomination.
>
> Maybe they're good images. I'll never know. Anything that won't
> allow me
> to actualy look at the image I want to look at, for the time I wish to
> look at it,
Brendan - can you give me the URL of where you are sourcing this from - I
have not found it yet (Haven't done a concentrated search though).
I want one as it seems to be the sensible solution to the need for a backup
to a blower for the immovable specks (only one tiny one after 3 months).
Rod
--
That should be appalling.
P. J. Alling wrote:
> I find that appealing. But then they didn't ask me.
>
> Tom C wrote:
>
>> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6163015.html?tag=nl.e589
>>
>> Hmm, not sure I'd want to look at ads while processing photos.
>>
>>
>> Tom C.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
Marnie - hopefully you haven't gone yet: if you haven't please please please
don't!
That was one of the best expositions of a personal approach to viewing
images I have read in a long time, with no artsy-fartsy artspeak, and I hope
Godfrey doesn't take offence.
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
-
And another - magic 60 :)
Rod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Michael Perham
And one more ...that's 59.
Mike.
___
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://p
>
> From:
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> The theme of my PAW 08 photograph continued to bump around in my head.
> The abstraction has to me something of the feel of etchings or
> scrimshaw. I liked how the first presented a very simple composition
> and told a quiet, small story.
>
> So here are 7 more in
I've found the FA 28-200 a nice range on the *ist-D[x] series. Not a
sterling lens on film but quite good on an APS-C digital body.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> I tried a SMCK 45-125/4.0 zoom for the
> first time today on my istDS. I really
> like the zoom range on APS, feels like a
> good ol' 70/8
I find that appealing. But then they didn't ask me.
Tom C wrote:
> http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6163015.html?tag=nl.e589
>
> Hmm, not sure I'd want to look at ads while processing photos.
>
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
Joe,
should I really thank you for making me want that lens more than before?
H...
Pancho (getting ready for LBA, methinks)
Joseph Tainter schrieb:
> "I believe Joe Tainter did that some time ago. His conclusion was that
> it's almost a toss up on performance ... they both perform very well
On Feb 28, 2007, at 3:35 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
> In shooting, the DA 21 does have some barrel distortion. I never
> really
> evaluated the FA 20 for that.
Both the FA20 and the Canon EF20 have similar barrel distortion. I
haven't evaluated them for differences, although I might dredge up
On Feb 28, 2007, at 3:31 PM, Rod Connan wrote:
> Put the empty cards in label up (visible for SD cards) and used cards
> returned to pockets label down (contacts visible for SD cards).
That's how I've been managing to keep myself from making mistakes for
the past couple years. Works well.
G
I tried a SMCK 45-125/4.0 zoom for the
first time today on my istDS. I really
like the zoom range on APS, feels like a
good ol' 70/80-200/210 on 35mm (actually its about 68-188 equiv).
The 45mm focal length on the
short end is very welcome( even wider would be nice) . I
dont think I would like a
Cheat!
Walter Hamler wrote:
> I had to go to the Previous Galleries and all of 2007 is listed. When you
> click on March it opens. The later ones, April on, do not.
>
> Walt
>
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thurmodynamiks aand itz inevibl fx
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:45:39 +, Steve Jolly wrote
> John Whittingham wrote:
> > I guess it's just a matter of waiting then, I hope they do finally
release it
> > before they move on to K1D or whatever.
>
> It's a real pain - I need to shoot some long stereo timelapse
> sequences for work, a
Here is an example of Joe Mauer leading off of first last summer:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/406193828/
This was taken with the m200f4.0 - I really think this lens shines on
the ist ds, colors nice and saturated, contrasty and sharp. Not much
bad to say about it at all.
D
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6163015.html?tag=nl.e589
Hmm, not sure I'd want to look at ads while processing photos.
Tom C.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks all for your input,
I'll have to decide if (F)A 20 is for me, or if I'll wait.
In the end, I own a K 18, so I can hardly justify buying another lens
with a similar focal length, which his nearly as bulky. The only gain
would be on digital, but I think that most pictures in that focal leng
I was given a hint when browsing for a similar device by one of the
manufacturers sites.
Put the empty cards in label up (visible for SD cards) and used cards
returned to pockets label down (contacts visible for SD cards).
I may add the write protect step too
Rod
-Original Message-
From
John Whittingham wrote:
> I guess it's just a matter of waiting then, I hope they do finally release it
> before they move on to K1D or whatever.
It's a real pain - I need to shoot some long stereo timelapse sequences
for work, and I was all set to buy a pair of K10Ds until I discovered
that th
Well, isn't it close to that time? ;-)
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
"I believe Joe Tainter did that some time ago. His conclusion was that
it's almost a toss up on performance ... they both perform very well,
the DA21 is slightly better on some aspects."
Correct. They are very close in terms of sharpness.
In shooting, the DA 21 does have some barrel distortion. I
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 23:09:23 +, Eric Featherstone wrote
> On 28/02/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 28/2/07, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> > >But there's no mentioneing of what SDM stands for.
> >
> > Should Do More.
>
> Sa Do Masochism
>
> Or maybe just maybe Super
On 28/02/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 28/2/07, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >But there's no mentioneing of what SDM stands for.
>
> Should Do More.
Sa Do Masochism
Or maybe just maybe Supersonic Drive Motor
Cheers,
Eric.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
Easter Egg... :-)
Tom C.
From: "Walter Hamler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To:
Subject: March PUG IS UP
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:01:16 -0500
I had to go to the Previous Galleries and all of 2007 is listed. When you
click on March it opens. The later ones, April o
The theme of my PAW 08 photograph continued to bump around in my
head. The abstraction has to me something of the feel of etchings or
scrimshaw. I liked how the first presented a very simple composition
and told a quiet, small story.
So here are 7 more in a gallery presentation with Autoview
I had to go to the Previous Galleries and all of 2007 is listed. When you
click on March it opens. The later ones, April on, do not.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
In a message dated 2/28/2007 2:44:59 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 28/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Okay, I woke up early and have some time this morning...
Nice piece Marnie. Enjoyed reading that. Respect.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
==
On 28/2/07, Jens Bladt, discombobulated, unleashed:
>But there's no mentioneing of what SDM stands for.
Should Do More.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
On 28/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Okay, I woke up early and have some time this morning...
Nice piece Marnie. Enjoyed reading that. Respect.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
February... March... they're *pretty* close.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: March PUG IS UP
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:19:04 -0500
Same here. Even after refreshing the browser.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2007,
On 28/2/07, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
>payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
>it, I bought myself a major gift:
>
>OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
>http://tinyur
I'm still seeing feb. also, even after refreshing.
Tom C.
From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: March PUG IS UP
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 15:18:28 -0700
Refresh?
Tom C.
From: Evan Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Di
Same here. Even after refreshing the browser.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2007, at 5:10 PM, Evan Hanson wrote:
> Are you sure? I still see February.
>
> Evan
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdm
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:02:50 +, Peter Lacus wrote
> Jens,
>
> > I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses,
like
> > the FA* 2.8/80-200mm
> > It's better than I thought it would be:
> >
> > http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg
> > http:
Refresh?
Tom C.
From: Evan Hanson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: March PUG IS UP
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 17:10:06 -0500
Are you sure? I still see February.
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.ne
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 20:56:56 +, Peter Lacus wrote
> John,
>
> > I've not compared the K 200/4 to the M 200/4 despite owning the K.
However a
> > couple of years back I tested M 200/4, A 200/4, A 70-210/4 and FA 80-320
(at
> > 200mm)against each other on film, the M 200/4 appeared sharpest
Are you sure? I still see February.
Evan
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Paul Stenquist schrieb:
> Reading mail and making prints at the same time can prove costly. I
> just printed a Bill Robb message on Velvet Fine Art paper. Maybe I
> should frame it?
> Paul
Paul,
you should have it signed, before framing it!
Pancho
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.n
Some nice shots. I like B&W!
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>I might try out the sidekick which I hear is good for the 500mm and is half
>the cost of the gimbal >heads.
I have the Kirk King Cobra & have no issue with it.
Check out a recent addition - the Jobo. Looks simple & I believe is less
costly that the full blown Wimberly & Kirk.
Now what about t
Tom,
> An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's Creek. The
> picture was taken from (guessing) 175 feet above the surface.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5654453
your place in PDML's Hall of Fame is ready. :-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
LOL. Thanks Peter.
Tom,
> An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's Creek. The
> picture was taken from (guessing) 175 feet above the surface.
>
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5654453
your place in PDML's Hall of Fame is ready. :-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Hi Mike,
> Tigerdirect.ca has the Transcend 150x 4GB cards that all the folks in
> the US rave about... (NewEgg.com doesn't ship to Canada, sadly).
>
> $66.99 for 4GB of 150x memory? Hell yeah. I could order 3 and have
> enough memory for 6 months! :)
not just in the US. ;-) They are IMHO not
John,
> Indeed. And the (current) official release date is May 15th,
> which just happens to be my birthday!
cool, I'm just wondering how they knew it? ;-)
Cheers,
Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
John,
> I've not compared the K 200/4 to the M 200/4 despite owning the K. However a
> couple of years back I tested M 200/4, A 200/4, A 70-210/4 and FA 80-320 (at
> 200mm)against each other on film, the M 200/4 appeared sharpest with best
> definition followed by a close call between A 70-210/
Jens,
> I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses, like
> the FA* 2.8/80-200mm
> It's better than I thought it would be:
>
> http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg
> http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg
wow, t
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
> He takes after hs mother.
She wasn't there?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
William,
>>>http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/temp/flare70.html
> It's not that good a picture...
> As an aside:
> The picture in the background was one I shot on my Dad's OM-1 just before I
> bought my LX.
I think your new lens was just envious from seeing a picture made using
a competitor han
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Great news Christian. I'm sure you'll put it to good use.
>
> Now all you need is a Sherpa to carry it, a tripod & head!
h that's the second sherpa comment. Cesar? where are you?
Seriously, the lens is so frigging expensive that I could not buy the
wimberley or ki
Congratulations! That's extreme enablement.
Paul
On Feb 28, 2007, at 2:34 PM, Christian wrote:
> Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
> payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like
> investing
> it, I bought myself a major gift:
>
> OT because it
He takes after hs mother.
Tom C.
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 13:55:53 -0600
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing
On 2/28/07, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
> http://tinyurl.com/2yvktl
Does that come with a sherpa to carry it?
-Mat
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Very nice colours&composition.
On 2/26/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (SNIP)
>
> BTW, I'm moving to larger standard display sizes. This one is square
> at 624x624 pixels ... I'd like to know if anyone has difficulty with
> this size photo, particularly in the vertical dimension.
Great news Christian. I'm sure you'll put it to good use.
Now all you need is a Sherpa to carry it, a tripod & head!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT - Happy Birthday to me major enablement
> Not to toot my own horn, but today is my
I promise we won't take it off trhe mountain.:-)
Dave
On 2/28/07, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think I want to watch Dave give it the respect it deserves...
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
> > Bring it to GFM, and we'll give it the respect it deserves.
> >
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > On
Quite interesting. I believe it will not be as popuklar here as frisbee
golf. The time of year with snow is relatively short.
http://frisbee.dk/sw991.asp
Regards
Jens Bladt
Latest photographs: http://flickr.com/photos/bladt/
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt
Now that's a nice "major gift" ...
Long teles is definitely Canon's forte. Good luck with it!
G
On Feb 28, 2007, at 11:34 AM, Christian wrote:
> Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
> payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like
> investing
>
- Original Message -
From: "Tom C"
Subject: Re: OT: Photographing Lincoln
> You should have smelled his breath after that Garlic-infused ale... we
> were
> looking for the dogs for hours.
Hell, we were looking for your kid for hours.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it against some fine lenses, like
the FA* 2.8/80-200mm
It's better than I thought it would be:
http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/0830-PM-200-56.jpg
http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg
Regards
Jens Bladt
Lates
On 2/28/07, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
> payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
> it, I bought myself a major gift:
>
> OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
> http://tinyur
Two words - You suck!
Tom C.
From: Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT - Happy Birthday to me major enablement
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 14:34:24 -0500
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
pay
Happy Birthday! Very woo-hoo indeed!
--
Bruce
Wednesday, February 28, 2007, 11:34:24 AM, you wrote:
C> Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
C> payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
C> it, I bought myself a major gift:
C> OT b
Christian wrote:
> Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
> payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
> it, I bought myself a major gift:
>
> OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
> http://tinyurl.com/2yvktl
>
> Should arri
Not to toot my own horn, but today is my birthday AND I got my bonus
payout as well... so instead of doing something sensible like investing
it, I bought myself a major gift:
OT because it does not have a Pentax badge on it
http://tinyurl.com/2yvktl
Should arrive in 3 or 4 days.
woo-freaking-
Hey,
Not changing the To: address when sending a message offlist is very easy to
do. I'm sure many of us smiled because we have been there.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PAW 2007 - 07, 08, Soft Li
I thought you said you weren't going to post for awhile .
--
Bruce
Thanks. I wasn't because I thought I'd run out of steam. But on the way to
work yesterday morning...
Tom C.
Tuesday, February 27, 2007, 6:36:20 PM, you wrote:
TC> An abstract of nature. It's a frozen over section of More's
On Feb 28, 2007, at 9:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Okay, I came back. ...
I'm glad ...
> So I'll probably be a bit meek and humble and quiet for a while.
> Marnie aka Doe :-} But you know that won't last long.
... and for that too. Wouldn't be right otherwise. :-)
I appreciate your co
Thanks Bruce, Jack, Bill, Ken, Godfrey, Christian, John.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Winter Thaw
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:10:49 -0800 (PST)
The composition took acuity. Ya' got "it".
A word
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
