You would. Although there can be times when slight underexposure is a plus in
that it can help extend the high end range. But more than a stop is just
wanking.
Paul via phone
On May 19, 2016, at 12:42 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> Lightroom only allows a few stops of exposure compensation, and it
Lightroom only allows a few stops of exposure compensation, and it is very
easy to exceed that range.
Why wouldn't you try to get the exposure right in camera ?
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: Can h
Adelaide, SA, Australia here.
- Peter
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
One from Feburary. I was on my way back from walking along the lake shore
(Lake Wanaka) when I noticed this cloud that appeared to be towering over the
mountains.
http://gallery.multi.net.nz/photo/1017/#peso
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/l
More from the cemetery:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18233420
(K-5, DA 16-45)
Comments appreciated.
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
t
Mark Roberts wrote:
Larry Colen wrote:
On May 18, 2016 1:13:42 PM PDT, Mark Roberts wrote:
I know most recent Pentax cameras are ISO invariant and I expect the
K-1 is, also.
Does this mean that you don't get any advantage from shooting a higher iso
rather than under exposing at a lower I
Thanks, Jack.
On 18 May 2016 at 12:16, Jack Davis wrote:
> A unique natural scene, Eric!
> J
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
>> On May 17, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Eric Featherstone
>> wrote:
>>
>> Again, from Kyoto, but on the western side this time in the Arashiyama
>> district.
>>
>> I'd been planning t
The article underscores what experience has taught me.
Paul via phone
> On May 18, 2016, at 4:58 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Larry Colen wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>> On May 18, 2016 1:13:42 PM PDT, Mark Roberts
>>> wrote:
>>> I know most recent Pentax cameras are ISO invariant and I expect the
>>> K
Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>On May 18, 2016 1:13:42 PM PDT, Mark Roberts
>wrote:
>>I know most recent Pentax cameras are ISO invariant and I expect the
>>K-1 is, also.
>
>Does this mean that you don't get any advantage from shooting a higher iso
>rather than under exposing at a lower ISO?
https://
On May 18, 2016 9:00:58 AM PDT, David J Brooks wrote:
>My copy arrived yesterday. Just had a look see. Another great
>production from mark and crew. Photos are excellent. I have noticed
>that every year mine seem to get farther to the back. I see a trend
>here.:-)
>
Your photos for the 2017 ann
On May 18, 2016 1:13:42 PM PDT, Mark Roberts wrote:
>I know most recent Pentax cameras are ISO invariant and I expect the
>K-1 is, also.
Does this mean that you don't get any advantage from shooting a higher iso
rather than under exposing at a lower ISO?
>
--
Sent from my Android phone wit
I know most recent Pentax cameras are ISO invariant and I expect the
K-1 is, also.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the lin
I believe that there is an analog portion to the circuitry before it
gets to the A/D converter. And this analog portion includes a
programmable amplifier. So the A/D is always giving you all the bits,
its just that at higher amplifications for higher ISO, the noise
factor is much higher.
On Wed
I'm pretty sure you're over-thinking this.
MARK !
covers alot of PDML traffic !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John"
Subject: Re: Can higher ISO give you more info about a low contrast scene.
I'm pretty sure you're over
I'm pretty sure you're over-thinking this.
On 5/18/2016 2:37 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I expect that the answer to this question is "Yes, but it makes no
practical difference".
Let's say a camera has a 12 bit D/A and at base ISO of 100 has 10 stops
of dynamic range. In theory the chart would look
Howcome the same data are spread over a larger contrast range when you
increase the ISO?
Jostein
Den 18.05.2016 20.37, skrev Larry Colen:
I expect that the answer to this question is "Yes, but it makes no
practical difference".
Let's say a camera has a 12 bit D/A and at base ISO of 100 has 10
I expect that the answer to this question is "Yes, but it makes no
practical difference".
Let's say a camera has a 12 bit D/A and at base ISO of 100 has 10 stops
of dynamic range. In theory the chart would look something like this:
DR ISO
__ _
10 100
09 200
08 400
0
Yes Please! I still need to order (searching for a discount code) and
last year it slipped my mind
On 18 May 2016 at 16:19, Rick Womer wrote:
> In my eager haste I find that I ordered the 2015 book from Blurb instead of
> this years. Oy.
>
> New order being placed, and gratification delayed a co
My copy arrived yesterday. Just had a look see. Another great
production from mark and crew. Photos are excellent. I have noticed
that every year mine seem to get farther to the back. I see a trend
here.:-)
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecount
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 9:26 AM, Mark Roberts
wrote:
> Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>>Ken Waller wrote:
>>
>>>Submitted but apparently not used -
>>>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18060138
>>
>>Check out page 6...
>
> Also pages 7, 11 and 101.
I peered at all those pages with a magnifying glass
In my eager haste I find that I ordered the 2015 book from Blurb instead of
this years. Oy.
New order being placed, and gratification delayed a couple more weeks.
Anyone want a 2015 PDML book?
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark Roberts wrote:
>Ken Waller wrote:
>
>>Submitted but apparently not used -
>>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18060138
>
>Check out page 6...
Also pages 7, 11 and 101.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.ne
That sent me back to page 6 and Eureka! saw mine too
so lets just say the Salon de Refuses is for photos that didn't get a
full page :-)
When I got the PDF I naturally looked at all the big photos , read
quotes, etc...
ann
On 5/18/2016 8:19 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ken Waller wrote:
Sub
Ken Waller wrote:
>Submitted but apparently not used -
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18060138
Check out page 6...
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UN
A unique natural scene, Eric!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 17, 2016, at 11:30 PM, Eric Featherstone
> wrote:
>
> Again, from Kyoto, but on the western side this time in the Arashiyama
> district.
>
> I'd been planning to go to tenryuji (literally heavenly dragon temple)
> to see the dragon
25 matches
Mail list logo