I like this one better, Jack.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 1:18 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> This a slightly earlier shot of his approach.
>
> C&C?
> Thanks!
>
> J
>
> https.net//www.photo.net/photo/18443855
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
> Eric Weir wrote:
>>
>>
>> Thanks, Paul. I skimmed the article and will read it more carefully shortly.
>>
>> Some things I gather from the skim: Since I use Lightroom, I guess the
>> answer to what converter I use is Adobe Camera Raw. And
Actually, it seems to be a different sub comment that opens fine on
the computer but not the phone.(?)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
>
> Bad URL, Jack. Should be...
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18443855
>
> I like this. You can tell from the
Bad URL, Jack. Should be...
https://www.photo.net/photo/18443855
I like this. You can tell from the position of the wings he's reducing
his airspeed for a landing. I do find the brightness of the huddled,
OOF masses below the goose to be distracting. I think you could crop
nearly all of t
And the fact that Eric is comparing sharpness of a 28 mm lens with a
50-200. Most cheap telelenses tend to be somewhat soft at the long end.
A combination of the Pentax K5 with the FA28/2.8 AL gives good results
in my experience, even though this lens is not designed for digital.
Henk
Op 2017-
The apparent difference is probably due in part to the lenses. The DA 50-200 is
just okay at best.
Paul
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 1:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> Eric Weir wrote:
>>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>>
>>> You need to do some homework. You can start her
Thanks, Paul. I considered him as
having already landed. Guess it's
a matter of perception.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:18 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Excellent shot, but I see why some are having a problem with the proximity of
> the feet to the bit of land. You could fi
Eric Weir wrote:
On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
You need to do some homework. You can start here:
http://www.instructables.com/id/A-Complete-Beginners-Guide-to-Raw-Files-And-Raw-Pr/
Thanks, Paul. I skimmed the article and will read it more carefully shortly.
Some thin
This a slightly earlier shot of his approach.
C&C?
Thanks!
J
https.net//www.photo.net/photo/18443855
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Excellent shot, but I see why some are having a problem with the proximity of
the feet to the bit of land. You could fix it in PhotoShop, but it’s a fairly
big job.
Best,
Paul
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 12:52 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Well I thought it clear that he/she is landing or is about to l
Well I thought it clear that he/she is landing or is about to land.(?)
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>>
>> https://www.photo.net/photo/18443834
>
> My reaction is similar to Dan’s. Great shot of
Yes, and performing their intended
job of lending compositional
balance.
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 9:09 AM, Alan C wrote:
>
> They're all taking a gander!
>
> Alan C
>
> -Original Message- From: Daniel J. Matyola
> Sent: 14 December, 2017 5:50 PM
> To: Pentax-Discus
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:36 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> https://www.photo.net/photo/18443834
My reaction is similar to Dan’s. Great shot of the bird, but the composition,
especially the relation of the bird to the little jut of land in the
background, spoils it. Looks like the bird is stand on
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:06 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> After completing the basic tutorial, go here:
> http://www.geofflawrence.com/photoshop_raw.html
Thanks again, Paul. Another quick skim suggests this will be instructive, too.
On 13/12/17, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>- Make a set of JPEGs of the best ones for them. A reasonable size that
>they can put on their phones, essentially, something like 1600 pixels on
>the long edge works well.
>
>- Forget delivering raw files to anyone who is not a professi
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 10:05 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> You need to do some homework. You can start here:
> http://www.instructables.com/id/A-Complete-Beginners-Guide-to-Raw-Files-And-Raw-Pr/
Thanks, Paul. I skimmed the article and will read it more carefully shortly.
Some things I gather
They're all taking a gander!
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: 14 December, 2017 5:50 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Peso-Touch down
I like the posture of the bird and the active implied by the shot, but I
find all the objects, apparently floating o
Thanks, Dan!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 7:50 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> I like the posture of the bird and the active implied by the shot, but I
> find all the objects, apparently floating on the water, around the bird a
> bit distracting.
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.
I like the posture of the bird and the active implied by the shot, but I
find all the objects, apparently floating on the water, around the bird a
bit distracting.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Beautiful,
Beautiful, sunny, windless day at the preserve.
Landing White-face goose.
C&C?
Thanks!
J
https://www.photo.net/photo/18443834
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
After completing the basic tutorial, go here:
http://www.geofflawrence.com/photoshop_raw.html
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> It could be a matter of in camera processing if you were shooting jpegs.
>> Even when
You need to do some homework. You can start here:
http://www.instructables.com/id/A-Complete-Beginners-Guide-to-Raw-Files-And-Raw-Pr/
> On Dec 14, 2017, at 7:38 AM, Eric Weir wrote:
>
>
>> On Dec 13, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>>
>> It could be a matter of in camera processing i
> On Dec 13, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> It could be a matter of in camera processing if you were shooting jpegs. Even
> when shooting RAW the default settings of your converter can
> Make a huge difference. The only fair comparison is between expert renderings
> of each.
> O
Eric Weir wrote:
At one time I would not have considered any equipment other than Pentax. A
little over two years ago I bought a Fuji X-Q1 compact to take with me on a
trip to Italy that was going to include a week on bicycles. I was impressed
with the images I got with it. Also never would
24 matches
Mail list logo
