If the photographer is interested to use both of his eyes for
focussing/zooming, this can be used for the purpose.
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Rob Brigham wrote:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1372691505ssPageNa
me=ADME:B:SS:UK:1
What exactly does this do???
-
This message
All right all right.
Let me practice.
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ...
- Ayash
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Paris, Leonard wrote:
Ayash,
When you say thisgs like that, you need to inlude a winking smiley face. ;-)
Len
---
-Original Message-
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [mailto:[EMAIL
Agin!?
Once I get my hands on you
:-)))
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Peter Alling wrote:
BEEEP wrong guess again. :)
At 04:23 PM 8/12/2002 +0530, you wrote:
If the photographer is interested to use both of his eyes for
focussing/zooming, this can be used for the purpose.
On
Thanks for sharing.
Pal
On Mon, 12 Aug 2002, Pål Jensen wrote:
The renowned nature photographer Galen Rowell was killed in a plane crash during
this weekend. Rowell was one of the best American landscape photographers and was the
author of the best nature photography books ever written (in
Hi,
I think that you are right. The dual cable release is required to close
down the aperture and open the shutter simultaneously.
If the lens mount of the bellow unit has that lever which causes the lens
aperture to remain open even if you rotate the aperture ring higher
f/numbers, then it
Hi Bill,
Many thanks for the explanation. I will follow the lines
With regards,
Ayash.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee
Subject: Twin flash for Macro: Some thoughts
Hi Ayash:
You had best use both flash units in manual
I am able to understand it now.
Many thanks again.
With regards,
Ayash.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee
Subject: Re: Twin flash for Macro: Some thoughts
Ayash, with the setup Warren describes, the bellows factor and
guide
01:18:57 +0530 (IST)
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Twin flash for Macro: Some thoughts
I have no idea for how much extension of bellow and
separation between the
flash subject such cancellation takes place.
Maybe it was because the 80mm lens I was using
I feel that you can do all the things with LX that you want to do with
K1000 so I
suggest you to keep the LX and use it though you are not using it to its
full potential.
But just keeping an LX and not using it, is not good at all and selling it
is a disaster because it is an asset though I
Just now, a silly idea struck my mind.
Why SLRs are not made on wooden chasis in a metal casing? The vibration
damping performance will be quite good, I hope.
- Ayash.
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, William Robb wrote:
The Shen Hao wasn't being made when I bought the Tachihara. From
what I was able
Since, you are too critical about flash to subject distance, I will
strictly follow the lines.
Many thanks again.
With regards,
Ayash.
On Sat, 10 Aug 2002, William Robb wrote:
Hi Bill,
Many thanks for the explanation. I will follow the lines
Talking about lines, think about
Hallo all!
I have two flash units. I want to use both the flashes simultaneously for
frontal lighting, sidelighting and back lighting macro shots of flowers
etc. I have a synchronization cord, eye and cord extensions (2 m) to fire
the flashes simultaneously. The problem is automodes of the
On Thu, 8 Aug 2002, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee
Subject: Re: Strange Canadian Customs
So, no sales tax, tariff, administrative fees for new items or
is it the
country from where the item is coming matters?
What is administrative fees
Won't it be ZX-3, though I couldn't find any such name at pentaxusa
website?
Just guessing.
- Ayash.
On Fri, 9 Aug 2002, Shaun Canning wrote:
Can anyone tell me if the MZ-3 was called something different in the US?
Also, does anyone know what a good example is selling for second
Not exactly. It contained many 'virtual photos' of a hill station (Nandi
Hill) that I visited last month and that time I was accompanied by one my
friend. :-(
I don't care much about the money (since it was a short trip and it
can be visited again) that I wasted but I do care about the
On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, David A. Mann wrote:
I once misloaded my Z-1p and when it discovered that it couldn't wind the
film out, it rewound the film back into the canister. Had to go into the
shop to get my film leader back out and try again :)
I was not aware that Z-1p behaves same as Z-10
On Sat, 3 Aug 2002, Maciej Marchlewski wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Boy, oh boy! I blank fired 40 bullets. :-((
First time in my life.
Don't be to sad. As Forrest Gump said in the movie shit happens...
I have to accept it now
Hallo all!
Today I was shooting with my new Ricoh XR-8 Super at a park nearby.
Altimately the frame counter reached 36. I thought that I may be able to
squeeze out 2 more at least and went ahead, 38 now. But hey! I can advance
it further. I was over joyed. Took one more, 39 now. To my
Hi Cotty,
On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Cotty wrote:
Hi Ayash,
Sadly I do not.
No problem. :-)
I have an old school friend in Oregon who sends me all my
best humour. I rely on him for it all!
In that case, please ensure that you should also send to PDML also. It is
fun to watch and appreciate
Many thanks, Adelheid.
Cheers,
Ayash.
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Adelheid v. K. wrote:
Hi *,
the August PUG is ready to go. I am a bit early but you probably don't mind.
;)
Another month with great pics.
Cheers
Adelheid
--
About resizing your pics:
To make
Snapped at the right moment. Amazing.
Do you have anymore collections as this one?
Cheers,
Ayash.
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Cotty wrote:
A friend sent me this URL with 20 odd shots that you may find amusing...
http://home.pacbell.net/rds33/best_photos/index.html#top
enjoy,
Cotty
-
This message is
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Bob Walkden wrote:
you might like to remind yourself that not everybody on the list is from
the USA. There was another wall for a little while, in Berlin, which some
people still remember.
Bob
Bob, you are missing one more important wall.
The Great Wall of China,
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Brad Dobo wrote:
I'm just a stupid Canuck, but I've never heard of the ZX-L, can anyone give
me a link to it? It's not on the Canadian Pentax site.
Brad Dobo
Hi!
Please look for MZ-6 at Canadian Website. As far as, I can remember, it
was there at the Canadian Pentax
From: Mat Maessen
Subject: Re: Pentax 35-80 smcp-a f4-5.6 lens
For a school camera, I would definitely push him towards a
50mm prime
lens over the 35-80 zoom. I have this 35-80, as well as a
couple of
prime lences (A-series 50mm f1.7, and an M-series 50mm f2.0),
and the
primes are
On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Robert Harris wrote:
William Robb wrote:
Not surprised you got the wrong answer. Pink Floyd is far more
meaningful to most people than the above mentioned wall (which I
had only vaguely heard of, I might add).
William Robb
Speak for yourself, please.
What
On Mon, 29 Jul 2002, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
Some have complained the ZX-L's use of pentamirror instead of ZX-5n's
pentaprism. I have been using MZ-7 (which has the same pentamirror
viewfinder as ZX-L) side by side with my Super A and ME Super (both
pentaprisms), and personally, I don't find
On Sun, 21 Jul 2002, Cotty wrote:
5. Claim to be a photographic student. (this last one works for me - and
not a lie - i'm learning all the time!)
...all ways of guaranteeing people will ignore you.
Hey Cotty!
I liked your last advice. Let me try it out. :-)
Ayash.
Make sure
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Bob Walkden wrote:
I can see a lot of advantages to shooting a burst of
video rather than a few frames of stills, and if it's easy to get a
high quality still out of the video burst, I wonder why anybody would
use a stills camera if they have a DV camera like this? It
Hallo Francis!
The bokeh looks better because of its circular shape in the first
photograph (tree bark) though they are not quite prominent.
In the second photograph of the bud, the bokeh is prominent but it is
clearly of hexagonal shape.
May be some people may like the other way round. :-)
Aaaah, I am getting some fresh air.
Cheers,
Ayash.
On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Rubenstein, Bruce M (Bruce) wrote:
High quality video isn't the dame thing as high quality stills. There's
still only something like 400 scan lines, so it's not going to be better
than VGA resolution. It may look
check the gasket
check the oil sealing
check the oil quality? Has it gone bad? Yes?
then change it. another messy job. getting a good bath with vacuam pump
oil of grade 18. :-(
Oh no! What you have done? You have used the wrong grade. Use grade 100.
Drain it out. Another bath but this
Please ignore this mail.
Ayash.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
Hi!
The photographs are really quite good and creative. But why there is no
comment for photograph no. 3 in your list?
- Ayash.
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, happyness wrote:
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=126134
http://www.photosig.com/viewphoto.php?id=138009
You have not mentioned the names of the persons in the photograph. I think
that they are all PDMLers.
- Ayash.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, tom wrote:
While we're at it:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/tom/images/gfm-group.jpg
I'd like to say it was a bad scan, but the fact is I didn't give the
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, William Robb wrote:
They never got around to fixing them after the Canadians
invaded
them, destroyed their roadways and burned down their White
House
HAR!!!
Why the fellow Canadians of PDML are silent about this
accusation? Do you
feel very easy
Gottcha!
Ayash.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Peter Alling wrote:
Well that would depend on the State and the current time in the repair cycle.
At 09:06 PM 7/14/2002 +0530, you wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Peter Alling wrote:
Being from the formerly industrialized North East US, that's a
that's excitement.
Jeff.
Oooh! Now I understand. Things are getting much clearer. What do you
think, Sir (refering to William)?
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:57 AM
Subject: Re: camera
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Chris Brogden wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jul 2002, William Robb wrote:
They never got around to fixing them after the Canadians invaded
them, destroyed their roadways and burned down their White
House
HAR
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, tom wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ayash
Kanto Mukherjee
You have not mentioned the names of the persons in the
photograph. I think
that they are all PDMLers.
Oops, I thought we were all
]
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 15, 2002 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: GFM Group Shot
You have not mentioned the names of the persons in the photograph. I think
that they are all PDMLers.
- Ayash.
On Mon, 15
I add one more question:
Who was the winner of the beauty contest?
Cheers,
Ayash.
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, David Chang-Sang wrote:
Cotty..
good to see the pentax crew on the other side of the pond :)
big question though: Who's camera was used to snap the photo ?
Cheers,
Dave
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, [iso-8859-2] £ukasz Kacperczyk wrote:
Hi all,
I've just bought my first flash - a Vivitar 283, and as usual I have some
questions. First of all - where can I find an online manual for it?
The light emiting thing of this particular specimen is a bit yellowish -
is it
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002, Lawrence Kwan wrote:
Not as it stands now! There are still too many problems with the surgery
Could you please let me know the nature of the after effect of that surgery?
You may check out this web site:
http://www.surgicaleyes.org/
Admittedly, it is a bit
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Maciej Marchlewski wrote:
Dnia 10-07-2002 o godz. 6:17 Ayash Kanto Mukherjee napisal(a):
[...]
I am sorry for the inconvinience.
Nothing to worry. I was just a little surprised when I used the
ling you've sent. But it's very common lately that people put
wrong url
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Alan Chan wrote:
3. If the power of your eye has not changed for the past 8 years or more,
please think of undergoing a lasic surgery which will reduce the power
of your eyes to 0 precisely.
I don't know about that. I have heard too many stories on this surgery.
John Coyle wrote:
IMHO, it's unrealistic to criticise the LED brightness in these
circumstances - if they were bright enough to see in full sunlight,
you'd be blinded by them at night!
The display in the Z-1p viewfinder dims brightens depending on the
light meter reading.
I use to carry my camera bag containing two SLR bodies, and three lenses,
viz., 35-80 f/4-5.6, 100-300 f/4.5-5.6 and 24 f/2.8, a polarizer, red,
yellow, green, orange filters. I load one body with ILFORD 100 ASA uprated
to 200 ASA and the other body contains a slide film, Fujichrome Sensia II
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Patrick White wrote:
Anyone else ever had a similar bout of the blahs? What did you do to beat
the blahs?
Yes, sometimes I feel that way, blahs.
I usually surf the net to watch photographs made by other photographers.
Sometimes it gives a lot of ideas which I
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Chris Brogden wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
3. If the power of your eye has not changed for the past 8 years or more,
please think of undergoing a lasic surgery which will reduce the power
of your eyes to 0 precisely
Hallo all!
Continuing the thread, I digged out the slides that I shot using my MZ-M.
The exposure seems quite accurate. However, in two cases, it overexposed
the frame. This is happening probably because 2-segment multipattern
metering is close to centerweighted metering. To check this point
Hi gang!
Recently, Joe (Joseph Tainter) responded me privately and he reported that
it needed membership to open the webpage that I have mentioned in my
earlier mail. This is quite surprising as all of my friends and relatives
were able to view the webpage without any problem.
In that case,
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002, Peifer, William [OCDUS] wrote:
Ayash wrote, regarding my tale of my previous life:
And, what do you mean by that? Please explain.
Hi Ayash,
It was a ~joke~ that shows what a silly question the professor appeared to
have asked. Jokes about professors in graduate
On Tue, 9 Jul 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 7/9/2002 3:37:47 PM Central Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
He also praises the all-mode DOF, saying This is an improvement over the
PZ1-P and ZX-5n, which allow a stop-down preview only in the aperture
Hallo all!
At last I made it for the second body. I wanted to have the following
features.
1) Mechanical shutter
2) DOF preview.
3) Mulitple exposure capability.
3) Manual film advance and rewind.
4) Flash synchronizaton socket besides hot shoe.
5) Centerweighted average metering.
6)
Hi Bob!
Could you please let me know the price of L/6, both grey market and list
prices?
Thanks in advance.
With kind regards,
Ayash.
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bob Rapp wrote:
Hi Gang,
Over the weekend, I was doing some heavy duty pondering
(ponder,ponder...). The new L/6 is an very well
On Mon, 8 Jul 2002, Bob Rapp wrote:
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:11 PM
Subject: Re: Pentax - New Directions
Hi Bob!
Could you please let me know the price of L/6, both grey market and list
prices?
Thanks
Hi All!
I have recently scanned some photographs which I took during a picnic at
Sangam and Mekadatu which are located in the state of Karnataka, India.
The rocky areas in the photographs is Mekadatu and it is located 5 km away
from Sangam.
Here is the website where you can view the
Hi all!
I have currently shot 2 rolls of Black and white films (Kodak Academy 200
ASA); one was uprated to 400 ASA and the other as such. Presently, Ilford
PAN 100 uprated to 200 ASA is in my camera.
I have a 300 ml negetive developing tank in which two rolls of film can be
simultaneously
Hallo Bob!
From your reply it seems to me that there is no limit to the number of
films for batch processing. Do you mean that I can develop as many number of
films as I wish provided that the two films in my developing tank is
totally covered by the developer? Well, as far as I think, the
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 5:34 AM
Subject: Max. # of B/W film.
Hi all!
I have currently shot 2 rolls of Black and white films (Kodak
Hi Bob!
After reading the comments/advice of you and many other PDMLers I have
decided not to reuse 1:1 D76 for processing more number of films than
indicated.
Thanks for your advice.
With kind regards,
Ayash.
On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Bob Rapp wrote:
D76 1:1 works very wellbut one shot
On Wed, 3 Jul 2002, William Robb wrote:
What you called uprating is one of my pet peeves. The generic
term is actually pushing the film, and it causes a loss of
shadow detail and an increase in contrast. If you are shooting
in very flat light, it is not so bad, but often, the environment
Yep!
I have tried it and it works great. Try some long exposures; astonishing
results.
- Ayash.
On Tue, 2 Jul 2002, Amita Guha wrote:
Would 400 speed film be ok to shoot fireworks or should I get 800
instead?
Thanks,
Amita
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
f/4 lens.
Please correct me, if I am wrong anywhere.
Many thanks for your comments.
With best regards,
Ayash Kanto.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
I have some doubts regarding lenses with small f-numbers. Suppose you have
two lenses, one
Hallo Yves!
Just a few minutes ago, I replied to Bill.
You are absolutely right in your point. I know that quite well. The
f-number is defined as the ratio of focal length to the diameter of the
aperture (Am I correct?). But I am talking about the preliminary intensity
of light reaching the
Hi Yves!
Your explanation is absolutely clear to me. So, it is the diaphragm which
blocks of the extra amount of light collected by lenses with bigger front
element.
Yeah! I liked the pinch of salt.
I am very much thankful to you and Bill.
Now, I am in a position to arrive at the second
Hi!
I think that 28-135 mm f/4 is the best option because of the range focal
length one gets and also the maximum aperture do not change when the lens
is zoomed in. This is great advantage. Why? Because, this
lens can be used with automatic flash units because one can set the
aperture
Hi!
I understand your point quite well now. I liked the term funneled down
that you used in your explanation.
Many thanks, Bill.
With best regards,
Ayash.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Bill D. Casselberry wrote:
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
You are absolutely right in your point. I know
Hi!
It is quite an informative email. I never knew the details of the lighting
in a stadium until I recieved your mail.
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002, Bob Walkden wrote:
Hi,
According to Michael Freeman in his book Light all stadiums that have
TV coverage use multi-vapour lamps, because these
Hi Joe!
So, you mean that professional photographer are shooting all the time at
f/2.8 and hence they possess those lenses becuase they really need that
aperture
only.
Yes, you are right that a monopod will make the life much easier under
such situation.
Many thanks for your helpful
Hi Giafranco!
I visited the websites that you have mentioned and can understand the
position from where you took the shot. I was suspecting from the beginning
that it should be some sort of hilltop because the skycrappers in your
photograph look small but I never knew that there is castle
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Richard Seaman wrote:
Adelheid,
I think Paul Jones' Rain photo might have got corrupted by the
comptuer. On my screen it's got some strange artifacts in it.
Richard.
home page: www.richard-seaman.com
Same has happened with me also.
- Ayash.
-
This message is
A heart attack for me.
- Ayash.
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002, Mike Johnston wrote:
Re: Somewhat amusing
I guess it would help if I told you what the page was..
http://www.hermes.net.au/bayling/repair.html
SACRILEGE!!!
And at the very least, he should be wearing safety
Hallo all!
According to Boz's K-mount page, PENTAX produces two FA lenses in the
range 28-105mm f/4-5.6
One has power zoom option and the other one has IF (Internal Focussing).
Boz has also stated that the one with IF is possibly fabricated by Tamron
wth genuine PENTAX electroncs and SMC
-
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 27, 2002 10:15 PM
Subject: FA 28-105 mm f/4-5.6
Hallo all!
According to Boz's K-mount page, PENTAX produces two FA lenses in the
range 28-105mm f/4-5.6
One has power zoom option
, more contrast and
better color. That may have been due to the SMC coatings, but overall, I
was happier with the old PZ version. however, the Tamron is a very nice
and compact lens, as well as quite light when compared to the Pentax PZ lens.
- Original Message -
From: Ayash Kanto
Hallo Timothy!
The focussing plane of a non-macro lens is not flat, it is spherical (if
spherical glass elementsa are used). Therefore, if you keep the center at
focus,the corner will go out of focus and if you keep the corner in focus,
the center will go out of focus, in general. Our eyes can
Hi!
I have borrowed a 50 mm f/1.7 M-series from my friend. I want to use some
manual extension tubes with it to try out some macro shots. Can anybody
please tell me, how to do the metering before taking the shot? I am a user
of MZ-M. And above all
I want to know whether the use of manual
Thanks Brendan for assuring me that the camera won't be hurt. As far as I
can remember, you also possess an MZ-M.
Cheers,
Ayash.
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Brendan wrote:
The MZ-M will be fine with it.
--- Ayash Kanto Mukherjee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I have borrowed a 50 mm f/1.7 M
Rochester, NY
-Original Message-
From: Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 21, 2002 11:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Manual Extension Tubes!
Hi!
I have borrowed a 50 mm f/1.7 M-series from my friend. I want to use some
Hi Patrick!
It seems to me that you quite lot of experience with Macrophotography of
insects (I have not yet started. Ahhh! that close up kit; I want to kick
it off) and I think that it would be helpful in the near future when I you
can see me chasing the insects with the macro lens on my
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Rodger Whitlock wrote:
If you are seriously interested, I direct you to the following Kodak
publications:
N12A: Close-Up Photography (essentially up to 3x lifesize)
N12B: Photomacrography (3x to 50x lifesize)
N16: combined hardback edition of N12A N12B
These
So, there are ways out to problem like this, I mean; how to photograph
dragonflies. Only experienced people can tell us solutions like this.
Regards,
Ayash Kanto.
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, John Mustarde wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 16:15:26 -0800, you wrote:
Oh, and dragonflies.. just
Hi Dan!
I shall be photographing mostly insects whose dimensions are less than
24mm by 36mm, therefore a 1:1 macro lens is essential for that. I have to
choose which focal length. Shall I go for (90/100/105mm) or
(180/200mm). Both have some advantages and disadvantages. Probably the
degree of
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Jan van Wijk wrote:
BTW: One advantage of the 100mm macro lenses is that they are a bit closer,
allowing better coverage by a ring-light (flash).
I sometimes find that the 200mm macro is too far away to use the AF-140C flash
wich has a rather low guidenumber.
Regards,
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Jan van Wijk wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 14:18:43 +0530 (IST), Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
Suppose I need a longer working distance than 1 feet, then you
should ask me to go for 200 mm Macro lens. In order to solve the problem
in cheaply, suppose I use a teleconverter
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ayash,
I have a A100/2.8 Macro which is just great.
It goes 1:1, but I rarely use it that way.
I took a butterfly at 1:1 last week.
It looks like a monster!...bug eyes hairy feet.
Amazing! you can those very fine hairs on the feet.
generally use two metz 45 bracket flashes on standard
light clamps. Its ungainly, but works ok. it also requires a large degree
of co-operation from the subject :)
Hope this helps,
T.
At 14:18 25/06/2001 +0530, Ayash Kanto Mukherjee wrote:
Hi Jon!
You are absolutely correct
On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, petit miam wrote:
--- Ayash Kanto Mukherjee
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many thanks for your comments and views. I should
keep my close-up filters
aside in the corner of my darkroom and allow the
dust to settle on it.
N
Hi!
I have not yet purchased a real Macro lens for high detail macro work
instead I am using close up filter kit to achieve magnification as great
as 1:1. There are two basic problems that I encountered while using this
kit. One is however, the depth of field is not enough for apertures like
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Yoshihiko Takinami wrote:
Hello Ayash,
At 3 Jun 2001 10:25:20 +0530 (IST),
Ayash Kanto Mukherjee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote;
Do any of you happen to possess this body or used it sometime? Please
comment (good or bad) on this body.
I have two
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Mr. Stoopid would like to thank everyone who offered good ideas for
preventing this foolish mistake from happening again, and for not
making Mr. Stoopid feel too much like Mr. Sphincter.
:-)
Wish you all the best.
Ayash K.
-
This message is from
Hi Shel!
Many thanks for such a nice mail.
I really liked your mail. In fact, many experienced photographers with
whom I interacted told me exactly the same thing. Most of the time, I use
metered manul mode in my camera but while making candid street
photographs, I am forced to switch to
Yes, that is what exactly I want to know. Any suggestion/comment??
Regards,
Ayash K.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2001, Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior wrote:
Thanks for the precise explanations. just one more question: How do you
determine how many exposures do you need to get it right? My guess is that,
on
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, Eduardo Carone Costa Júnior wrote:
Cameron hood wrote, when describing his, by the way, gorgeous, submission
for this month's PUG:
Equipment: Pentax PZ-1p: 300mm F4.5 at F32; SMC 'Cloudy' filter;
multi-exposure exposure of about 8 - 10 seconds total exposure
I
Hi all!
Do any of you happen to possess this body or used it sometime? Please
comment (good or bad) on this body.
With best regards,
Ayash Kanto.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit
On Tue, 29 May 2001, Patrick White wrote:
I've used the same procedure. When the light meter in the K-1000 shut off
for lack of light, I punted and used spot meter mode of my PZ-1p body as a
light meter since it is more sensitive. Without it, I would have had to
guess -- I probably
Hi!
That is a really big cat, oh! How much it could weigh, any idea??
I liked self_con.jpg. Some
Alsesians are watching the cat passing by whereas a few of them have
their attention diverted towards the lens but the third one from right
seems to be a philospher. Neither the cat nor the
Hi!
Ya, I have seen your earlier mail regarding multiple exposure. Even one of
my friend should be the technique that you have mentioned with his MX
body.
Many thanks for advice.
With regards,
Ayash Kanto.
On Sat, 26 May 2001, petit miam wrote:
You can do it with any SLR camera that
Hi all!
I just want to know whether anybody used this body. If yes, I have a
question regarding its lightmeter. A friend of mine told me that the
lightmeter of Vivitar body (He used V3000) behaves non-linear with respect
to the film speed setting. For example, you are getting an exposure value
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
