I've been reading over this book recently just to get a feel for how a
well-known photographer went about his work. Its a pretty good book,
although, a lot of the pictures have similarities, making some of the
narratives a little repetitive: Most of them were taken only a little ways
from his
After only a few years into photography I've come to get a little bored with
color shots, and have realized that I personally find BW more intrieging and
expressive. Recently I have been shooting more with a Yashica-D TLR (fault
Tiger Moses for showing me his Yashica-D, while on a Business
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1249131626
does the lens this guy is describing really existthe description sounds
like he's reading off of the lens hood and not the lens. I can't tell what is
really there by the picture.
Brent
M100/2.8 - $165 (not rare, but not a common focal length)A100/2.8 - $185
(more for the same lens in A mount)K105/2.8 - $230+? (this I would call
semi-rare, it's old and some folks love it)
Thanks. This was the kind of information i was looking for. Several have
pointed me towards an
I think that someone from Texas should jump all over this one.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1239107821
Brent from Auburn, AL
Looks like a 'bama item to me, Brent.
Shoot naw. We ain't got no use fer dems down hear in the heart of Dixie. No
one hear wears axessories like
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1240410494
I'd like to see the picture of this one. It would have to be freaking huge
wouldn't it?
brent
has anyone seen this? Here's url:
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/corp/researchDevelopment/productFeatures/pictures.s
html?
This is just plain manipulative IMHO. Show someone an underexposed photo, and
then one properly exposed. For anyone who can spell ISO and knows the
difference between 100 and
I think that someone from Texas should jump all over this one.
http://cgi.ebay.com/aw-cgi/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=1239107821
Brent from Auburn, AL
8 matches
Mail list logo
