Hey Scott!
I'd like to say this isn't an ad, but it sort of is, since I'm quite
involved with developing the server version of this stuff.
Before you load something else, give this a try:
http://www.pclinuxos.com/
I much prefer it over most others, including 'buntu.
Even as an old Windows guy I
"none of my questions, according to the group archive have even showed up"
plus
"no one has answered a single one of my questions"
Anybody ever watch "Laugh In"?
Veeerrry Interesting, But Schtoopid! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf O
Nice sound effect!
Seriously though, some beautiful shots.
The only niggle is that the 'pop-up' window comes up way too small and has
to
be scrolled or enlarged each time.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Jens Bladt
> Sent: Sunday, M
Shot a wedding and reception Friday, do this once every few years just to
remind me how much hate it. ;-)
Got lazy this time, instead of sync cables all over I just used a small
onboard
bare bulb and set my 4 monolights to slave mode.
BAD idea! Forgot about all the incorrigible point and shooters!
Thanks for all the kind wishes,
he's coming home tonite to await the test results.
He's pretty well hydrated but still won't eat.
I just got back from the store with a few 'tasty tidbits' to
hopefully tempt his tummy. ;-)
Out of the 7 causes of this condition all are treatable but one.
Hopefully l
Poor old Beauregard:
http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/Eyes.htm
is spending some time in the doggie intensive care unit.
http://www.freypethospital.com/
They're very caring people.
After a very rapid decline in energy and appetite over the
last few days Beau was diagnosed yesterday with a
massive
gt; jewellery I've been shooting so this might bad time to ask. I'm going to
> have try both methods out, will probally only know what really works
> after its printed.
>
> Thanks
> Feroze
>
> PS are these scripts that you using portable between the various photo
g is not going to work for me, I have to look at each one
> and adjust accordingly. Are you guys using the Pentax software or PS?
>
> Feroze
>
> Don Sanderson wrote:
> > The reason I shoot jpegs for eekBay is that all I have to do is
> > run a small script in Photoshop w
WB is my bug bear at the moment. Its
> > driving me
> > nuts. As for composition, I have a pair of 150W studio lights and just
> > use the modeling lights to check for shadows. However I am not
> > carrying
> > around all this equipment, I have to look at these flore
modeling lights to check for shadows. However I am not carrying
> around all this equipment, I have to look at these florescent lights
>
> Feroze
>
> Don Sanderson wrote:
> > Hi Feroze.
> > I too use the EZ-Cube with 3 cheap compact florescents in white
> reflectors.
> >
Hi Feroze.
I too use the EZ-Cube with 3 cheap compact florescents in white reflectors.
These bulbs were $15.00 US for the 3 and last a very long time.
I set manual WB once from the white material of the cube and haven't had
to reset it in well over 2 years. I shoot strictly jpegs for eekBay stuff.
Thanks Mike. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> mike wilson
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 7:38 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: A Better Bounce Card, revisited.
>
> Nonetheless, it's good to see you around again.
t at full extension.
>
> I got my foam from a local art and craft supplier.
>
> Rod
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Don
> Sanderson
>
> Some time ago there was a thread on "A Better Bounce Card"
.
>
>
> That may be the lousiest done infomercial I ever saw.
>
> How you doing, Don? Long time no, read.
>
> -graywolf
>
>
> Don Sanderson wrote:
> > Some time ago there was a thread on "A Better Bounce Card":
> > http://www.abetterbouncecard.com/
Behalf Of
> Bob Sullivan
> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2007 3:46 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: A Better Bounce Card, revisited.
>
>
> Don,
> I cutout the bounce card from some scrap packing foam I found at work.
> It works just fine. Pictures on requ
revisited.
>
>
> Hi Don.
>
> I made one a few months ago, and agree, it works very well.
>
> I found the foam at a local convenience store for $0.99 and used a
> hair band from my daughters collection to secure it.
>
> Dave
>
> ps good to see you back on
>
> O
found the foam at a local convenience store for $0.99 and used a
> > hair band from my daughters collection to secure it.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> > ps good to see you back on
> >
> > On 4/29/07, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Some tim
Some time ago there was a thread on "A Better Bounce Card":
http://www.abetterbouncecard.com/
I tried this out a few days ago and they really do work well.
I still find the Gary Fong Lightsphere more versatile but at almost free
vs $49 the 'BBC' is a great option.
Here's a good source I found for
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 8:03 AM
> To: PDML
> Subject: Anybody hear from Don Sanderson
>
>
> Don Sanderson's been conspicuously absent from the PDML for quite some
> time. I
t
> Subject: RE: A better bounce card
>
>
> Hi Don
> thanks and a happy new year as well to you and Mr. basset :-)
> You have been quiet on the list lately?
> greetings
> Markus
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behal
Here's a list of retailers that carry the Creative Hands Foam:
http://www.creativehands.com/secondaryhtmls/wheretobuy.html
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Lawrence Kwan
> Sent: Sunday, December 31, 2006 11:44 PM
> To: Pentax-Discus
Outstanding work Dario.
And congratulations!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Dario Bonazza
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 6:06 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Published!
>
>
> All text & pictures by me, on shooting
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=Search&A=details&Q=&sku=46
0850&is=USA&addedTroughType=search
Can't afford one right now but I'm glad it's here anyway. ;-)
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Giving away the punchline early ruins the joke. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> John Francis
> Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2006 11:39 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Bad news
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 10
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> William Robb
> Sent: Sunday, November 05, 2006 6:18 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: eekBay Wow!
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Don Sanderson"
> Subj
Nice stuff but Holy Cow:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=320043421841
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It's a lot more expensive but a LOT smaller and lighter than their 28/1.8.
62mm vs 77mm filter size.
It's the hugeness of the 28 that's kept me away.
Please let us know what the results are like.
It would be hard to justify when I own the wonderful FA35/2 though.
Don
> -Original Message---
Hi Doug, anything you use to grip it will bend the ring a bit
out of round, jamming it in place.
Try laying it face down on a thin piece of rubber. Gently hold
the piece that isn't supposed to turn and twist.
I just lay stubborn ones face down on the palm of my hand and turn,
almost always works.
See??
This is why people should _use_ a lens, look at the results, and then decide
whether _they_ like it or not.
All reputation aside, I like the Tak Bayonet 135/2.5 very much for tight
portraits.
The wide open 'softness' is perfect for this.
I definitely won't let it get the sun in its eye though
Sutures?
I'm jealous, all I ever get is staples! ;-)
Don (Whose belly looks like Zorro got him!)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mark Roberts
> Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:52 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Home recovering
Hopefully this will come out soon (for Linux) and even the odds a bit:
http://www.rawtherapee.com
I haven't used the WinDoze version yet but it sounds quite capable
compared the the very basic ufraw.
CinePaint is another editor worth investigating for Linux.
I haven't quite come to terms with it
boys
a run for their money! ;-)
Thanks for noticing my absence.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 1:32 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: Don Sanderson
>
>
> Has anyon
Congrats, 3 of the best zooms I've ever used! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 11:14 AM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: OT: Becoming Pentaxian Again
>
>
> I am now the proud
Outstanding image, you deserve the win.
Congrats!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:15 AM
> To: pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Another PDML Win
>
>
> I won the Detroit New
No better luck here, first part in a long time I haven't been
able to cross to _something_.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Peter Loveday
> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 8:29 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT (Ve
Yep, and it's trying to make a perfect exposure off
that nice, black, pressure plate! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Pål Jensen
> Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 8:18 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: LX trouble
>
Thanks Bruce!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Bruce Dayton
> Sent: Tuesday, August 01, 2006 4:06 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO: The Modern Fisherman
>
>
> Great shot! I sat and chuckled at this one. Well s
Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: TreeHouse from PUG
>
>
> What sorts of things live in it?
> Nice shot, but very strange object! :)
>
> Jack
>
> --- Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Here is a much larger version (245KB) of the tr
ax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: TreeHouse from PUG
>
>
> Nice! The detail and texture in the tree trunk is
> great (nice 24-90 lens!). Would it be easier to shoot
> with a polarizer? There's a lot of reflection off the
> light wood, the roof, and the foliage.
>
Here is a much larger version (245KB) of the treehouse showing more of
the detail:
http://www.dsanderson.com/TreeHouseBig.htm
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thank you Adelheid, lovely arrangement.
One of the nicest PUGs I've seen since joining the PDML.
A number of the photos are as beautiful as any I've seen anywhere.
Only one comment for right now;
Toralf, don't be self-conscious, it's wonderful!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PRO
Thanks for the info Kostas.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Kostas Kavoussanakis
> Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 4:01 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Impulse Buy
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Ju
You...bet...you...do.
Thanks again Ann!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Ann Sanfedele
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 5:33 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Cloud photos _may_ get published!
>
>
> Don,
> Do I get cre
Recieved from the Cloud Appreciation Society:
Dear Don,
I am the photo editor of The Cloud Appreciation Society, and
I wanted to be
in touch about the attached images.
We have begun an agreement of recommending some of our favourite images for
possible publication in The Internat
I've pretty much sworn off zooms, but look at the bokeh
in the last 3 pics. Yummy!
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=140013436209
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Har! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Don Williams
> Sent: Sunday, July 30, 2006 5:29 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: PESO: The Modern Fisherman
>
>
> It's probably Bait and S
rhaps he's conducting a phishing scam.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Bob
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> > Behalf Of Don Sanderson
> > Sent: 30 July 2006 02:48
> > To: PDML
> >
Using "Google Fish's" real time infrared satellite imagery & GPS to
> locate the school of fish?
>
> Searching the web for fish recipes for when he gets home?
>
> Putting together a EBay auction to sell all that useless fishing gear
> that can't catch anyth
Caught my eye at the park today:
http://www.dsanderson.com/modern.htm
How times have changed! ;-)
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Do you have one of these Frank?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VUqsF8vbR_Q&mode=related&search=
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> frank theriault
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 4:44 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: OT:
Beautifully done!
And with a "lowly" K1000, I'm SO ashamed! ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Gabriel Cain
> Sent: Friday, July 28, 2006 5:06 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: PESO: Wilman's Peak
>
>
>
> http://gabri
Hey! What news could be more gooder than that? ;-)
Congrats!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mark Roberts
> Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2006 5:36 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: OT: People in academics
>
>
> ...as of today I are
I've found the wireless feature so useful that's it's the sole
reason I still own a ZX-L.
Wonderful to be able to handhold the flash at any angle you want
without having to strangle yourself with wires.
Combined with the selftimer I can be my own lighting crew. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message
I've found it to be excellent on the ist-D.
I'm not too fond of the bokeh on the FA135
but it certainly is sharp.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Thibouille
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 3:08 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subj
Photography? What's that? ;-)
Neat article, thanks.
Here's the authors rather nice website:
http://www.thomashawk.com/
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mark Roberts
> Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 9:59 AM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject
Hi Ann,
When I saw the film last night there were only about 12 other
people there.
I found it very odd that at 52 years old I was the youngest in
attendence, I had expected to see quite a few "Tree Hugger"
hippie types, among which I used to, and still do to a great
extent, number myself.
The movi
Agreed, I just returned from the movie.
Quite eye opening but I now feel the need to dig deeper,
not to panic.
The science is good, but the facts are all being channelled
towards one specific conclusion, there may be others.
I certainly feel the need to know more, that was the movies
primary effect
Gorgeous!
I would like to withdraw my entry. ;-(
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Mark Roberts
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 3:14 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: PESO: Architecture shot that didn't make it into the PUG
>
>
> Al
I know it's for insurance reasons, but
http://www.dsanderson.com/Beware.htm
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Very!
I'm off to see the movie tonite, I'll let you know if
it's still funny after that.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Saturday, July 22, 2006 9:16 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PDML; SeePhoto Camera Talk
>
Or are you the only soldier marching in step?
>
> John
>
> On Fri, 21 Jul 2006 23:43:26 +0100, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > I've been un-subbed from the list about 1/2 dozen times now for
> > "excessive bounces".
> > I'll
d the bounce threshold to a higher
> value. Perhaps that will help.
>
> Doug
>
> On Jul 21, 2006, at 6:43 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > I've been un-subbed from the list about 1/2 dozen times now for
> > "excessive bounces".
> > I'll try
I've been un-subbed from the list about 1/2 dozen times now for
"excessive bounces".
I'll try one more time from this account.
If it doesn't work I think I'll just stay unsubbed until the list
glitches get sorted out.
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
And I still have nothing to submit for architecture! ;-(
Buncha crap, but nothing good.
Between the 100 gegree days, storms and doing 2 peoples jobs
there hasn't been much opportunity for photography.
Still have today though, always did work better under pressure. ;-)
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Looking at eekBay "completed items" and KEH are good sources for
pricing items.
My only suggestion would be to take another look at the F and A 35-70s.
Both of them, particularly the A, are very good lenses.
Mine are very much on my "keepers" list.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> mike wilson
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:02 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Reply from Pentax on FA28-70/4 repair.
>
>
>
> >
> > From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2006
#x27;re quoting you is very reasonable. I expected it to
> cost more than $100.00 it looks like I'll be calling Pentax next week.
>
> Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> >As most of you will recall I've been trying to get an answer from
> >Pentax as to whether they can f
As most of you will recall I've been trying to get an answer from
Pentax as to whether they can fix the fogged/cracked element in
the FA 28-70 lens.
Sent it to Colorado last week, got a snail-mail reply today.
Well, the good news is that they _can_ fix it.
Sounds like they'll pretty much rebuild t
t 85.
>
> Bob
>
> On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > Now that I've lost this auction, does anyone know exactly what it was?
> > I smelled a fast 85 or something like that.
> >
> > http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewIt
linkoff
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:55 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: What is this lens?
>
>
> Definitely not a Pentax lens ...
>
> Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Don Sanderson
>
> ?
> >
> > Now tha
Now that I've lost this auction, does anyone know exactly what it was?
I smelled a fast 85 or something like that.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=110005873742
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
ndemuehl
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 8:08 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Another eekBay steal!
>
>
> At 08:47 PM 7/13/2006, you wrote:
> >Message: 7
> >Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:58:26 -0500
> >From: "Don Sanderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
(Re-Sent)
Item # 180007465233.
M 75-150/4
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
home
> decor, and can even get it printed on black velvet for you. The velvet is
> extra.
>
> Shel
>
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: Don Sanderson
>
> > Really nice Shel, well done.
>
>
> > > http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/greenun
Item # 180007465233.
M 75-150/4
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Really nice Shel, well done.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2006 6:15 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: PESO - Underside of a Leaf
>
>
> While sitting in the living room of my friend's house, I noti
Actually I rather like it, not as a photo, but as a graphic.
It's really rather flattering to the model.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Jens Bladt
> Sent: Wednesday, July 12, 2006 12:01 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject:
You're right Jens, it looks like the AF kept locking on her bangs.
Nice job though, hard model to shoot.
Deep set eyes and she needed some makeup to help the look of her
complexion, it's rather shiny and not very smooth.
I'm still patiently awaiting the DA 70, hope it's as nice as the 77! ;-)
Don
Superb shot Ralf, tells quite a story.
Most people would be surprised to know folks live that close to one
of these.
Tough animals, aren't we?
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Ralf R. Radermacher
> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 1:54
Outstanding Shel, I love it!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 3:04 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: PESO - Girl With a Cane
>
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/gwc_b.html
>
>
>
> Shel
>
I thawt I made a spelling misteak wunce.
Butt I was rong. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 8:18 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: PESO - dodge ball tournament
>
>
>
Very nice.
I've always egretted not living near the ocean.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> P. J. Alling
> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 9:50 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: PESO -- Pink Moon
>
>
> With all this talk abo
e fact that it doesn't look at all like a K1000, quite a
> bargain for someone.
>
> Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> >Is anyone else frequently getting their PDML subscription
> >suspended for "excessive bounces"?
> >It's happened 4 times now for no apparen
Sheepish grin) A PDMLer did get it.
>
> Bryan
>
> On 7/9/06, Don Sanderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yeah, I know.
> > I was ready to click, but between the car, the dog and the
> > surgery I'm broke as a joke right now.
> > I already have the 50
ginal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Collin R Brendemuehl
> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:54 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: SMCP-F 1.7x AF Adapter
>
>
> At 09:01 PM 7/9/2006, you wrote:
> >Message: 16
> >D
The drool's OK but he gots no teeth!
"Excuse me sir, does your dog gum?" ;-)
Don (Owns Basset Hound, very used to drool!)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Paul Stenquist
> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:56 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Li
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 09, 2006 8:19 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Magic Hour
>
>
> In a message dated 7/9/2006 4:51:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >
SMCP-F 1.7x AF Adapter
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2006, at 19:51, Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> > OK this is a BIN, so it should be OK.
> >
> > eekBay Item # 140006246722
> >
> > 1.7x plus other very cool stuff.
> > Go get it before I do! ;-)
>
> Wow. T
Is anyone else frequently getting their PDML subscription
suspended for "excessive bounces"?
It's happened 4 times now for no apparent reason.
I seem to be getting most/all messages when I compare
mine to the archive.
Makes it impossible to follow threads when you keep
getting kicked off and have t
OK this is a BIN, so it should be OK.
eekBay Item # 140006246722
1.7x plus other very cool stuff.
Go get it before I do! ;-)
Don
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I agree that the photo would have greater impact if the DOF was a bit
deeper, however I like it very much as is.
This only took me a few seconds to dowload and I really like to see this
quality of photo posted.
Might I suggest posting two versions, one for those with slower
connections.
You would g
(Please note that I've written this to reinforce my understanding as much
as to help others)
I've had a great deal of trouble coming to terms with digital exposure.
Seems I'm not the only one.
I've learned that this is because I've read the following (only 50% true)
statement many times:
1.) With
9:09 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Coming Soon - A new K-mount Film Camera
>
>
> I keep hearing that the A35-105 is a great lens, I only wish I could
> find one...
>
> Don Sanderson wrote:
>
> >Hi Jens, I've hesitated to get into this because
Hi Jens, I've hesitated to get into this because I, and most of us here,
know you take beautiful photographs.
How you do it is your business, not mine. ;-)
I will say however that I have learned a huge amount about digital and
exposure from two places.
One is Bruce Frasers book "Real World Camera R
Hi Bob,
Film, like the human eye, is very sensitive to subtle differences in
tones at the darker end of the scale.
It is very insensitive to the differences at the brighter end.
Digital, on the other hand is linear, equally sensitive to all light levels.
However, when shooting RAW you have only 12
I noticed that they go rather cheaply.
The F 70-210 is a fine lens but IMO the bokeh is rather harsh
for portraits.
I like the results in Daves shot, I may have to try one.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Lucas Rijnders
> Sent: Tues
BTW: I had always understood the FA 70-200 to be a dog.
Detail in the shirt, arm, hat and guitar is excellent.
So much for that theory!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:12 PM
> To: p
Simply outstanding!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 12:12 PM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Paw
>
>
> One from the weekend.
>
> istD with FA70-200 and shot in Raw. Converted in PSC
Nice moment Shel, well done.
Lady in front's a tad scary though. ;-)
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Shel Belinkoff
> Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 6:02 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: PESO - Breakfast at Tina's Creekside Cafe
>
>
> http://h
Nice Paul, I really like the way he stands out from the crowd.
Good choice of DOF.
The high key, light colored scene with his mostly black and
white outfit works for me too.
The only nit I have is that (on my monitor) his face looks rather
washed out, like it needs a bit more contrast.
Don
> --
1 - 100 of 2324 matches
Mail list logo
