Re: M50/1.4 fungus remedies?

2002-08-02 Thread Don Williams Finland
Spell checkers can be a pain. For dissector read dessicator. Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 - Original Message - From: Don Williams Finland [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday

Re: Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom

2002-08-02 Thread Don Williams Finland
-coated either. Quality-wise, below the SMC stuff. Wendy Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 15:36:20 +0300 From: Don Williams Finland [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom Hi all, I have a Takumar-A 28 - 80 mm, f3.5 - 4.5 'Macro' Zoom is this any good? The pictures that my daughter took

Re: On how I officially entered to The Brotherhood (a bit long)

2002-08-02 Thread Don Williams Finland
I had trouble with my ME Super metering once ... underexposure. I moved the speed selector dial back and forth a dozen times and things went back to normal. That was a couple of years ago - that camera reads the same as the other Pentaxes I have here - checked this afternoon - exactly. I've got

Re: M50/1.4 fungus remedies?

2002-08-01 Thread Don Williams Finland
Dismantle the lens. Clean all glass parts in hot soapy water with the fingers - Fairy Liquid is good. Dry glass components, on edge, on a clean surface in a dust free place - after rinsing off all traces of soap with tap water, followed by distilled water. Don't be tempted by solvents like

Takumar 28 - 80 Zoom

2002-08-01 Thread Don Williams Finland
Hi all, I have a Takumar-A 28 - 80 mm, f3.5 - 4.5 'Macro' Zoom is this any good? The pictures that my daughter took with this lens a year ago seem reasonable. It came attached to a P30 I found in a shop in the city. I put the lens on an ME Super and gave it to my offspring to use for snap-shots.

Re: M50/1.4 fungus remedies?

2002-08-01 Thread Don Williams Finland
Williams Finland wrote: Dismantle the lens. Clean all glass parts in hot soapy water with the fingers - Fairy Liquid is good. Dry glass components, on edge, on a clean surface in a dust free place - after rinsing off all traces of soap with tap water, followed by distilled water. Don't

Re: RE: FA 100mm f=2.8 Macro and macro ring light: Questions

2002-07-29 Thread Don Williams Finland
Hi all, Some weeks ago I put some pictures of reflectors I've been using used for macro-photography with flash on my web site. I've just put them back. The bottom row are close-ups taken using the reflector contraption seen attached to the P30T.

Re: Digital doubts

2002-07-25 Thread Don Williams Finland
How do you keep the Epson jets clean? I found that I used so much ink cleaning the bloody thing that it became a financial burden. It sits here doing nothing now. D Dr E D F Williams http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery Updated: March 30, 2002 -

Re: Push Processing Film

2002-07-24 Thread Don Williams Finland
The reciprocity effect is only important for exposures of several minutes. For normal applications it can be ignored. When recording diffraction patterns on an optical bench for example, where exposures may be as long as fifteen minutes, the effect becomes serious. But in this case the film and

Re: Push Processing Film

2002-07-24 Thread Don Williams Finland
How can you say that Wheatfield Willie is right? That C41 can't be pushed? I've just carried out a well controlled experiment and the results show unequivocally that it can be pushed quite nicely. Take a look. http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams/hold/index.htm Don Dr E D F Williams

Re: Push Processing Film

2002-07-24 Thread Don Williams Finland
. Paul Don Williams Finland wrote: How can you say that Wheatfield Willie is right? That C41 can't be pushed? I've just carried out a well controlled experiment and the results show unequivocally that it can be pushed quite nicely. Take a look. http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams

Negative density plots (ranges) for Pushed Solaris FG400 C-41

2002-07-24 Thread Don Williams Finland
Right - ladies and gentlemen, More information. Analysis of results obtained in the push process experiment with Solaris FG400 film. I'll keep this simple and non-technical as far as possible. It would take some pages to give all the details. The scanner was not calibrated, I have no means of

Results of test - C41 push processing.

2002-07-23 Thread Don Williams Finland
Processing Ferrania Solaris FG400 for 1600 ASA. An introduction is unnecessary since the intention is obvious. Methods and Materials. Film: Ferrania FG400 Camera used for test exposures: Pentax P30 with SMC Pentax-M 50/1.7 and VMC Vivitar 135/3.5. Processing: Tetenal Colortec C-41 Rapid

Re: Pushing C-41

2002-07-22 Thread Don Williams Finland
and possibly the Supras are set up so the orange mask isn't as sensitive to development times as in other films. Haven't tried it myself, and the mask is only half the problem. tv -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Don Williams

Re: More on pushing C-41

2002-07-22 Thread Don Williams Finland
According to the Tetenal technical people Reala 800 pushes very nicely to 3200. They recommend 30s per stop of push. My calculations were short by 7s. I developed for 288s with developer that had already processed four films - the normal' time would have been 3m 55s. Don Dr E D F Williams

Re: Program A mirror problem?

2002-07-18 Thread Don Williams Finland
Try moving the film feed sprocket in the forward direction with a clean finger. This might get the mechanism back in register. This happened to me with three different single lens reflex cameras an ME Super and two Alpa Reflexes. Don Dr E D F Williams Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery

P30 and P30t macro photography

2002-07-18 Thread Don Williams Finland
Hi all, I've been here, but off the list for a while. Now I'm outside crawling about taking pictures of flowers, many being only 2-3mm diameter, as usual. Macro Photography with P30 and P30t: Equipment: Pentax P30 and P30t, Sigma Macro 50mm, several Pentax lenses with Soligor macro converter,