Hi Stan,
I have this lens and also the Takumar Zoom 70-150/4.5 that preceded it. They
are both great lenses and perform much better than one would expect from
lenses that old.
The 70-150 is a Super Takumar lens, while the 80-205 is a Super Multi Coated
Takumar one. However, the later doesn't
That depends, Albano.
If you want to clean the front elements, all you have to do is remove the
decorative ring in order to have access to the front groups. They are
probably screwed in place as a unit. To have access to both sides of each
element, there will probably be retaining rings. By the
Hello Everybody,
I recently acquired two old spot meters on Ebay that, despite being in very
good cosmetic shape, complete with respective caps and cases, were described
as not working and for parts only. Paid U$53.00, including shipping,
for both of them.
When they arrived I saw the only thing
Thanks, Tom.
I'll let you know what happens, even if the photos turn out to be completely
lame... :-)
I'm saying that it's probable that the camera can't turn the flash off in
time to avoid overexposure.
I think I'll go the distance and get two or three more rolls and see for
myself what
Aaron,
It was scanned, at low resolution, from a 4x6 print, on a cheap flatbed
scanner. The original has more detail, but not much.
Those points you mentioned are exactly the ones I wish were more detailed.
Unfortunately, I don't scan or print myself. Here in Brazil it's still less
expensive to
Thanks, Tom.
I had never used any film faster than ISO 800 before, and I don't know
exactly what to expect from this one.
Why do you rate it at only 1250?
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
I know this has nothing to do with the purpose of this list, but I can't
avoid expressing myself in this tragic moment.
What happened today is beyond belief and your Country is called again to pay
the price of leadership.
May God be with you.
Eduardo.
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
Earlier today, Aaron Reynolds wrote:
This is a very common misconception. The Ns do not represent pure,
unaltered exposure; rather they indicate that no correction has been
made to the machine's automatic reading of the neg. Thus, getting a
roll printed all Ns means that the machine will do
Hi,
I don't have mine here with me right now, but I
believe it only gets down to 5.6 past 135 mm.
Hope it
helps.
Hi,
If you don't find a candy that has brighter colors,
I believe you can use the MM and try to spray it with glicerin or any kind
of stuff that's used to make a car's dashboard shine.
Of course you can't eat them
afterwards!...
Last week, after the opening of this month's PUG
gallery, I uploaded some of my photos and asked if the members of this very fine
group of Pentax Users would mind taking a look at them and telling me what is
right or wrong about them and how I could try to improve them.
the feedback I got
Thank you for your comments, Tom.
BTW, I don't have the fainthest idea of what "HCB"
stands for... Can you tell me what it means and is a HCB devotee?
About cropping and editing: I know they are
photographic skills but I guess that capturing subject and surrondings in the
correct amout in
12 matches
Mail list logo
