>>I don't need an MZ-S right now.
>
>Wow! It's good to see someone driven by practicality over marketing!
>
Now, here's a Classic oxymoron if I ever saw one. Pentax? Marketing?
Har de har har!
-joe
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.n
>Pentax should knock together a quick thousand dollar
>digital in K-mount, something with features similar to
>other current mid-range 3.3 or 4 megapixel cameras. A
>K-mount digital would make Pentax a major player again
>overnight.
>
>My money is waiting on a 4-megapixel digital K-mount
>autofo
So sayeth Robert James:
>inexcusable for a single barrel extension. I also have the new Tamron
>24-135, and the build quality is much bettervery tight. Again, I have
I've been trying to find the specs for this lens. Tamron's web site
has been unreachable whenever I've tried (well over a
Things have been getting dull around here with everyone preoccupied with
Mike's questions.
Here's one thing Bryan Geyer has to say about tripods:
Why is a tripod essential?
Because blur due to lens movement is inevitable at any shutter
speed slower than 1/1000 sec., and because it promot
Mike Johnston trolled for article fodder:
>Which body and two lenses would you choose?
>
>Totally optional: name the subject and/or locales you'd choose to
>photograph.
>
Tools: Spotmatic with SMC pinhole lens
Assignment: Nude street photography.
Never tried this style of photography, so I
After a bit of a wait, I finally got my MZ-S this weekend.
It replaces my aging ZX-5N, which had chronic autofocus sensor problems and
more recently the light metering seems to have gotten flaky, underexposing
very badly at random intervals. This provided me with significant incentive
to overcom
>
>Not automatically. If you advance the frame counter while the
>camera back is open (using the control dial while pushing a button)
>then the camera will automatically advance the film to the selected
>frame once the back is closed.
>
>--
>John Francis(6
Now that some lucky people on the list have the MZ-S in hand ...
How does the film roll numbering system and midroll rewind work?
I recall there was some debate in the past as to how these features worked. In
particular, when you put a partially-used roll back in the camera, does it
automati
>It's a photo any of us should brag about. It's on the cover of a major
>publication! What have any of us done to match that?
>
I think "brag" was the wrong term to use earlier
Well, like I said, the heavy-handed manipulation of the central element in
the photo ruins it for me.
Quite obvi
>The June 2001 issue of Popular Photography has a cover photo of Mout
>Rainier by Tim Harris, taken with a Pentax 645 and 35mm f/3.5 lens.
>
It's Fitzharris
Anyway, not a photo I would brag about. Note in particular how much
brighter the mountain's reflection is, or how well defined the moun
>
>>One of these links should give you the information you want. They are
>>both updated regularly.
>>
>>http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/
>>http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/roadinfo/mtnhwys.htm
>
>Thanks John (and everybody else supplying the info, IT'S OPEN! :-)
>
If you don't have this URL already
>> I realize that none of you aliterates are likely to read this,
>or even get
>> to the bullet points, but here goes:
>>
>>
>http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23370-2001May13.html
>
>I'll read it when I get a moment..
>William Robb
>
Don't bother, I hear the journalist will be
I realize that none of you aliterates are likely to read this, or even get
to the bullet points, but here goes:
http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A23370-2001May13.html
Very informative, if you read it, about some rather disturbing trends; and
the Kodak packing is only a minor manifest
>At 08:26 PM 2/7/01 +, Bob W wrote:
>
>>We do this to confuse your president.
>>
>>--
>>Cheers,
>>Bob
>
>This one is smarter than he lets on.
>We finally have a good businessman as Pres.
>
Is this the governor who "ran" three oil companies and bankrupted them all??
-joe
-
This message is f
14 matches
Mail list logo
