I just happened to pause at a newsstand long enough to note that:
(1) The cover of the new Popular Photography features something like "we
test the 3 best prime lenses ever"
(2) The inside cover indicates that the lens test section is the article
indicated on the cover
(3) Unless I missed somet
This site includes several portraits taken with various lenses including the
FA*85 and the FA77 Ltd. Apparently, the portraits were shot on the same day,
at the same location, of one model and on one film.
http://www.t3.rim.or.jp/~azuma/html/camera/lenses_test/001123/wakana.html
Those of you who
Those of you who actually respect copyrights might be annoyed that Pop
Photo was ripped off by the owner of this site, but perhaps you'll be
tempted to peek at the old test results of the SMC A 50/1.2, SMC A
50/1.4, SMC Takumar 55/1.8 and SMC 50/4 Macro, and the competition, here
http://photoblue
Paal wrote:
"Back in '96 Pentax engineers said they were working on a sturdy,
professional slr closer to the LX than the Z-1p. I don't think the MZ-S
is that camera but I do believe the MZ-S may have inherited some
characteristics from that camera: the built quality and the user
interface."
Sinc
"Richard K. Holman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "I thought Ilfochrome
Classic (not the standard ilfochrome) was rated to greater than 200
years. The basic ilfo's are rated for much less."
My memory is fading faster than a print from a cheap inkjet, so it may
be that my recollection of the data fr
5 matches
Mail list logo