Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-22 Thread pnstenquist
Thanks Mark. If you ever really get the urge to move back here, just let me know and I'll send you some dirtty snow and muddy slush pictures. That should cure you:-). Paul -- Original message -- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-22 Thread Mark Roberts
Paul Stenquist wrote: >A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a conventional pan, >rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, 1/30th second with >the DA 50-200 @ 75 mm. >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4829944&size=lg Late with a comment here but... I really love this

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-22 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks Russell. That's part of the fun of shooting pans. You never know whose in the car until you process the pics. It's always fun to discover that someone was watching and knew you were shooting them. Paul On Aug 22, 2006, at 12:36 AM, Russell Kerstetter wrote: > nice shot, Paul. I agree tha

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Russell Kerstetter
nice shot, Paul. I agree that the girls looking at the camera make the shot. russell On 8/20/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a conventional pan, > rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, 1/30th second with > the DA 50-200 @ 7

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Brendan MacRae
Big fenders and big headlights. (apologies to women everywhere) -Brendan --- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 21/8/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, > unleashed: > > >To me, any lady with less than half a century on > her clock is young:-) > > LOL > > And big fenders. > > -- > >

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Brendan MacRae
n > > > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > >> Okay, is this better? This young lady was driving > a > >> 55 Chevy with a > >> 7.5 Liter Chevy Rat Motor. Probably around 500 > >> horsepower. She melted > >> t

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Cotty
On 21/8/06, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed: >To me, any lady with less than half a century on her clock is young:-) LOL And big fenders. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks Brendan. I generally prefer those as well. But the effect is nicest at dusk or at night. The Chevy with the girls was a daytime pic. Paul On Aug 20, 2006, at 11:11 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote: > > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> My slow pans are at an 1/8th second or 1/4

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Paul Stenquist
ED]> wrote: > >> Okay, is this better? This young lady was driving a >> 55 Chevy with a >> 7.5 Liter Chevy Rat Motor. Probably around 500 >> horsepower. She melted >> the tires coming off a stoplight, hammered second >> gear and broke the >> tires lo

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Cotty
On 20/8/06, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >Bob, those girls are, like, 11 years old.. Some see what they want to see... -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche ||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com _ -- PDML Pentax

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread David Savage
Steering wheel is on the other side Bob. Dave ;-) On 8/21/06, Bob W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > they shouldn't be driving cars then! > > -- > Cheers, > Bob > > > > enough. Don't they teach lasciviousness in your high schools? > > > > Bob, those girls are, like, 11 years old.. > > > > WW --

RE: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-21 Thread Bob W
they shouldn't be driving cars then! -- Cheers, Bob > > enough. Don't they teach lasciviousness in your high schools? > > Bob, those girls are, like, 11 years old.. > > WW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Brendan MacRae" Subject: Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes > Ok, Paul. I think you may be using the word "young" > pejoratively. > You hit a certain age and they are all "young". WW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Brendan MacRae
Ok, Paul. I think you may be using the word "young" pejoratively. ;-] -Brendan --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Okay, is this better? This young lady was driving a > 55 Chevy with a > 7.5 Liter Chevy Rat Motor. Probably around 500 > horsepower. She

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Brendan MacRae
--- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My slow pans are at an 1/8th second or 1/4 second, > and I get a lot of > movement on the car. Here's an example of a slow > shutter pan: > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631900 > > On Aug 20, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks David. Yes, without the girls, it's just another car pic. Paul On Aug 20, 2006, at 10:00 PM, David Savage wrote: > I really like this one. I think the two young ladies looking out at > you make it. > > Nice car too. > > Dave > > On 8/21/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> A p

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread David Savage
I really like this one. I think the two young ladies looking out at you make it. Nice car too. Dave On 8/21/06, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a conventional pan, > rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, 1/30th second with > th

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
I think they're teenagers. Seventeen or eighteen. Hard to tell though. Perhaps we should say no more:-). Paul On Aug 20, 2006, at 6:53 PM, William Robb wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "Bob W" > Subject: RE: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes > > >&

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Bob W" Subject: RE: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes > not close enough! The babes are the shot, not the car. If the car was > the shot it could be some fat middle-aged guy like me, but in this you > needed to get dangerously close, but still in

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
Okay, is this better? This young lady was driving a 55 Chevy with a 7.5 Liter Chevy Rat Motor. Probably around 500 horsepower. She melted the tires coming off a stoplight, hammered second gear and broke the tires loose again. Not bad for a girl. I got a shot of her at the next light. http

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks Brendan. On Aug 20, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Brendan MacRae wrote: > Great shot, Paul. > > -Brendan > > --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a >> conventional pan, >> rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, >> 1/30th second with

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
Thanks P.J. Had a great time shooting cars this weekend. A few ladies as well:-). Paul On Aug 20, 2006, at 5:42 PM, P. J. Alling wrote: > Very nicely done. > > Paul Stenquist wrote: > >> A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a conventional pan, >> rather than a slow shutter version. It's

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
My slow pans are at an 1/8th second or 1/4 second, and I get a lot of movement on the car. Here's an example of a slow shutter pan: http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3631900 On Aug 20, 2006, at 5:13 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote: > What's the difference between the two pans? > > Shel > > >

RE: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Bob W
x27;t they teach lasciviousness in your high schools? -- Cheers, Bob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Brendan MacRae > Sent: 20 August 2006 22:11 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread P. J. Alling
Very nicely done. Paul Stenquist wrote: >A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a conventional pan, >rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, 1/30th second with >the DA 50-200 @ 75 mm. >http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4829944&size=lg > > > -- When you're worrie

Re: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Brendan MacRae
Great shot, Paul. -Brendan --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a > conventional pan, > rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, > 1/30th second with > the DA 50-200 @ 75 mm. > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=48299

RE: PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Shel Belinkoff
What's the difference between the two pans? Shel > [Original Message] > From: Paul Stenquist > A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a conventional pan, > rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, 1/30th second with -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://

PESO: 55 Chevy with Babes

2006-08-20 Thread Paul Stenquist
A pan from yesterday's dream cruise. This is a conventional pan, rather than a slow shutter version. It's at f9.5, 1/30th second with the DA 50-200 @ 75 mm. http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=4829944&size=lg -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listi

Re: '55 Chevy

2004-06-13 Thread Ryan Lee
Really nice Paul.. Oh and the car's nice too ;) But seriously, that looks like a really sweet ride. I missed most of the discussion on this thread, so may have missed it- how much does one of those cost all minty like that? Regards, Ryan - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EM

Re: OT: '55 Chevy.

2004-06-13 Thread Paul Stenquist
Beautiful car Paul, with the 50 years coming up in 2005, is there anything planned for owners? Malcolm Thanks Malcolm. There will probably be some special events and perhaps even a retro look new car that pays homage to the original design. I belong to a club called Tri-Five Cruisers that in

OT: '55 Chevy.

2004-06-12 Thread Malcolm Smith
Paul Stenquist wrote: > I may have shown a pic of it here, but it's coral and white. > I put a shot up on Photo Net. This was shot with the 6x7 and > the 300/4 (just to keep this OT :-) Paul > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2438913&size=lg As you know Paul, a friend of mine a few