Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-10 Thread Lon Williamson
[Original Message] From: Boris Liberman I want to use my K 24/2.8 but my poor eyesight stops me from being able to focus it properly... Boris, tell me more. You find other lenses @24 (primes or zooms) easier to focus? I've always found wides hard to focus, the wider the harder, at anythin

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-10 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Feb 9, 2006, at 10:44 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: Godfrey, I can do that, but like I explained to Shel, I cannot do that many times in a row... I'd rather be controlling outcome of AF than doing it myself. I often find it more difficult to make critical focus adjustments with a short le

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-10 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Fri, 10 Feb 2006, Boris Liberman wrote: And I have to have some focal length between 18 and 43, don't I? ;-) FA28/2.8. Great optics, no FA* premium, no 24/2 weight... Another out of the box suggestion: FA18-35 and sticky tape on 24. Kostas

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Don Williams
Hi Boris, I've have the *ist D correction set right to the end. If my eyes don't change I'll be okay. But you're quite right; it should go a bit further, perhaps by another 1.5 diopters? That might be difficult to achieve from the design point of view. My problem is now the other way round.

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! I first heard this from Graywolf a couple of years ago. I think that's what I have been doing wrong lately, too much touch-up and faff. Sure, it could be the camera or it could be the lens but I doubt it. Thanks for the reminder. Boris, 16-45? Kostas, that is sensible suggestion. For n

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! I have crappy eyes too. Good contrast when wide open is a big help. I've not had a K24/2.8 to try. The A24/2.8 is fairly easy to focus for me, but the FA20-35/4 is actually easier: it's got more contrast wide open than the A24. The FA35/2 is the easiest ... it's wide-open contrast is the

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! Get a diopter correction for your viewfinder. *istD has sufficient diopter correction. BTW, I have poor eyesight as well, and cannot use the finder in the istDS and some other cameras while wearing my glasses. But by adjusting the built-in diopter correction, I can use the camera very w

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Kostas Kavoussanakis
On Thu, 9 Feb 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: Technique is what matters. Learn to manual focus by watching the in and out of focus transitions as you turn the focusing ring, rather than trying to judge a static image with small, slow movements of the focusing ring. With a bit of practice, you ca

Re: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Godfrey DiGiorgi
On Feb 9, 2006, at 12:56 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: I want to use my K 24/2.8 but my poor eyesight stops me from being able to focus it properly... I have even harder time with Sigma 18/3.5 but that's beside this story. I have crappy eyes too. Good contrast when wide open is a big help. I've

RE: (AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Get a diopter correction for your viewfinder. BTW, I have poor eyesight as well, and cannot use the finder in the istDS and some other cameras while wearing my glasses. But by adjusting the built-in diopter correction, I can use the camera very well without my glasses. Go figure ... What's the

(AF) Alternative to K 24/2.8

2006-02-09 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! I want to use my K 24/2.8 but my poor eyesight stops me from being able to focus it properly... I have even harder time with Sigma 18/3.5 but that's beside this story. So I thought I might replace it with another 24 mm optic... Now, FA 24/2.0 is too big for my taste... From plg and from Stan'