Re: *ist D's ISO range (was: Fw: unanswered and unasked)

2003-03-06 Thread Frantisek Vlcek
One of the things I've noticed is that digital cameras handle under exposure much better than they do over exposure. I've been able to get very good prints from exposures that were three stops under exposed using most digital photo editors. and better yet using PhotoShop. Under those

*ist D's ISO range (was: Fw: unanswered and unasked)

2003-03-05 Thread Paul Franklin Stregevsky
I raised the question twice, I believe, in the days before you joined. I do a lot of shooting at ISO 800 to 1250. It would be a pity if the *ist D could not be used to shoot indoor school plays. There is no secret method for goosing the ISO speed. Whatever Pentax delivers, we'll be stuck with.

Re: *ist D's ISO range (was: Fw: unanswered and unasked)

2003-03-05 Thread Leonard Paris
circumstances, ISO 400 equates to a pretty high ISO. Have other digital shooters noticed this or is it just me? Len --- From: Paul Franklin Stregevsky [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: 'Pentax-Discuss' [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: *ist D's ISO range (was: Fw: unanswered and unasked) Date

Re: *ist D's ISO range (was: Fw: unanswered and unasked)

2003-03-05 Thread Herb Chong
:17 Subject: Re: *ist D's ISO range (was: Fw: unanswered and unasked) One of the things I've noticed is that digital cameras handle under exposure much better than they do over exposure. I've been able to get very good prints from exposures that were three stops under exposed using most