*ist D's relative file size capability

2004-09-24 Thread Jack Davis
I'm curious about all things photographic including digital. Since I own nine 35mm Pentax lenses, seems logical to check out the *ist D. While several have been playing with the phrase; *ist D..what a wonderful camera, I've also noted the many serious praises. Please help me understand what I read

Re: *ist D's relative file size capability

2004-09-24 Thread Rob Studdert
On 24 Sep 2004 at 14:33, Jack Davis wrote: I'm curious about all things photographic including digital. Since I own nine 35mm Pentax lenses, seems logical to check out the *ist D. While several have been playing with the phrase; *ist D..what a wonderful camera, I've also noted the many

Re: *ist D's relative file size capability

2004-09-24 Thread John Forbes
Rob, Any chance you could post samples of similar images recorded initially as JPG and RAW? Or at least point to a URL? I have resisted buying PS CS (have Elements) so far, and want to try and evaluate how big the difference is, and whether, for my less critical eye, it is worth paying for

Re: *ist D's relative file size capability

2004-09-24 Thread Rob Studdert
On 25 Sep 2004 at 1:34, John Forbes wrote: Rob, Any chance you could post samples of similar images recorded initially as JPG and RAW? Or at least point to a URL? I have resisted buying PS CS (have Elements) so far, and want to try and evaluate how big the difference is, and whether,

Re: *ist D's relative file size capability

2004-09-24 Thread Jack Davis
Rob, Thanks! Very helpful. I'm assigning your response to a folder for future reference. Considerate of you to take the time. Jack --- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 24 Sep 2004 at 14:33, Jack Davis wrote: I'm curious about all things photographic including digital. Since I